On 1/8/01 9:31 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, we should have a cleanroom re-implementation of this important API.
> If the current codebase in Apache doesn't meet this criteria, this problem
> should be addressed ASAP.
The implementation in the current Xerces tree is a fine clean room impl of
this. However do we really want to have more than one impl? Especially since
these classes go directly into JDK 1.4? I would hate to see a code
versioning problem around this from a technical standpoint.
> For the life of me, I can see no reason why the JAXP JSR community wishes
> to remain a PITA in this matter. It should follow the lead of the servlet
> JSR. What's particularly puzzling about this to me is that the enlightened
> individual that took that JSR fully open source leads the JAXP JSR...
I don't get to call all the shots all the time.
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
