cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core mbeans-descriptors.xml

billbarker2004/07/26 23:51:15 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core mbeans-descriptors.xml Log: Update the StandardContext MBean to match StandardContext. -- Adding antiResourceLocking attribute -- Remove the dynamic resource methods that

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Hi, > I think we do have agreement on droping IIS/iPlanet. Does this mean that in the future there won't be a way to integrate tomcat to IIS ? We have some customers that require use of IIS as frontend (for either political reasons or they want to use integrated windows authentica

Gaston Lanteigne/CA/TA.NA is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 07/16/2004 and will not return until 08/09/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Mladen Turk wrote: Well, the way I see (think that Henri has the similar ideas) is to have the ajp protocol lib, usable to communicate to TC from any container, not only http server, and mod_ajp as a layer on top of it _only_ for Apache 2.0 branch _and_only_ if the proxy_ajp doesn't get back propa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30340] New: - substract() disfunctional in CharChunk and ByteChunk classes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

why are we so focused on dynamic this dynamic that, there is nothing about mod_proxy that is dynamic, and instead of delaying the stability and release of a working mod_proxy with a load balancer, make it work, make it work well, then add fancy features. mod_jk2 became way to cluttered this exact w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30332] - Field charsetSet reset problem in class org.apache.coyote.Response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12056] - Startup scripts test for invalid permissions.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh

markt 2004/07/26 15:01:19 Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh Log: Fix bug 12056. Test for execute rather than read permissions since execute is what we need. Add missing JDK not JRE warning. - Ported from TC4 Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +5 -4 jakart

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30332] New: - Field charsetSet reset problem in class org.apache.coyote.Response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30331] New: - META-INF/context.xml creates conf/.../foo.xml as a directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh

markt 2004/07/26 14:29:42 Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh Log: Fix bug 12056. Test for execute rather than read permissions since execute is what we need. Add missing JDK not JRE warning. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +5 -4 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30291] - Wrong smap in expressions and scriptlets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30289] - Wrong SMAP mappings with body dependent tags

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

kinman 2004/07/26 13:50:36 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Log: - Fix 30291: Smap for a tag should not include its body. - Fix 30289: Incorrect Smap for multiple line java expression. Revision ChangesPath 1.236 +8 -5 jakar

RE: Mod_ajp initial

Costin Manolache wrote: > > AFICR you said that you will have something to share, and > I'd love to see > > some other, perhaps better ideas. > > No, I'm trying stuff on java side. > OK. > And just like with code - I don't think we are missing > propositions or > ideas. What is missing is

Re: Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

Costin Manolache wrote: 1. - add a new worker to a pool ( for example - expect big load, you buy more hardware, etc ). - gracefully remove a worker ( for upgrade for example ) - the implication is that sticky sessions will still go, no new sessions. - change parameters of a worker ( like balanc

Jeg er på ferie

I will be out of the office starting 23.07.2004 and will not return until 16.08.2004. Jeg sjekker mail innimellom. Er det ting rundt drift send mail til [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ha en fortsatt fin dag. Mvh Richard D. Nilsen Orkla Media SSIT

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: We have noted that mod_proxy + mod_proxy_http are slow compared with mod_jk. I think that the next step should be to try to find "why" instead writting a new modules. May be a quick hacked mod_proxy_ajp to replace mod_proxy_http is the first step.

PATCH: mod_jk get_cookie jvmroute fix

Attached is a patch that fixes the get_cookie in jk_lb_worker.c taken from the CVS today. The current implementation will fail if there are two JSESSIONID cookies at different domain levels. My patch below checks a JSESSIONID value for a known jvmroute before it returns a session cookie. The l

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/conf server-minimal.xml

remm2004/07/26 12:35:00 Modified:catalina/src/conf server-minimal.xml Log: - Update server minimal as well. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +3 -12 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/conf/server-minimal.xml Index: server-minimal.xml

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.commo

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2004/07/26 10:04:04 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Fix version #. What ever the next version is that is released from here, it is not going to be called 5.0.x. I did refer to that with the "5.5" revision number, because the API isn't

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initia

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets unusable, it will make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and mod_jk2 are... Dead. Nobody will get hanged for that. I don't think the goal is to accumulate more

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30325] - [PATCH] $CATALINA_HOME set unconditionally in bin/catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30325] - $CATALINA_HOME set unconditionally in bin/catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

- Original Message - From: "Rainer Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:48 AM Subject: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools > Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool > at the moment? > Yes. If at some point

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

I'll volunteer for the admin webapp stuff. I enjoy deleting stuff from there ;-). - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native conn

RE: Mod_ajp initial

Costin Manolache wrote: > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets > unusable, it will > > make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and > mod_jk2 are... Dead. > > Nobody will get hanged for that. > > > I don't think the goal is to acc

Re: Mod_ajp initial

jean-frederic clere wrote: We have noted that mod_proxy + mod_proxy_http are slow compared with mod_jk. I think that the next step should be to try to find "why" instead writting a new modules. May be a quick hacked mod_proxy_ajp to replace mod_proxy_http is the first step. Note that I am a bit

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

I committed a few things: - The new deployer is getting there. Missing is the support for the manager webapp, but this won't be too hard to write. - I redid partially the naming. Now the NamingResource object is the main object, and Context is not polluted. My list is: - Update manager webapp, a

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30325] New: - $CATALINA_HOME set unconditionally in bin/catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Both difference and similarity :-). Eclipse ( osgi actually ) has a similar flat loader implementation, but with finer control over what is exported/imported and pretty strong versioning. In addition osgi

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someon

Re: Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

First, by "dynamic updates" I mean changes to apache2 config that don't require a restart. For example, .htaccess files provide such a thing ( for a different area ). What updates ? There are several forms: 1. - add a new worker to a pool ( for example - expect big load, you buy more hardware,

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adapto

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

billbarker2004/07/26 10:04:04 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Fix version #. What ever the next version is that is released from here, it is not going to be called 5.0.x. Revision ChangesPath 1.78 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changel

RE: Mod_ajp initial

Graham Leggett wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets > unusable, it will > > make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and > mod_jk2 are... Dead. > > Nobody will get hanged for that. > > Some code is always better than no code -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30314] - Review new HostConfig and add something

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30314] - Review new HostConfig and add something

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30279] - allowLinking attribute value is not preserved or ignored after context is reloaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30314] - Review new HostConfig and add something

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Mladen Turk wrote: If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets unusable, it will make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and mod_jk2 are... Dead. Nobody will get hanged for that. Some code is always better than no code - at best, the code will be good enough to fit the need

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

Re: Please take me off the list.

> > Hi, > > Why am I included on this list? > > Please remove me from the list. > > Thanks. > > colin > > > - To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

Hi all, I am starting a new thread for this, as it seems to be an important killer-app feature for any httpd v2.0 integration. People have said the config should be dynamically configurable - which part of the config should be dynamically configurable? In other words, would any of these senario

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30279] - allowLinking attribute value is not preserved or ignored after context is reloaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java

remm2004/07/26 08:54:39 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java Log: - When using the antiLocking flag, attempt to remove as much of the temp files when stopping. - As it was the case before, remove the work dir when u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30274] - Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader WebappClassLoader.java WebappLoader.java

remm2004/07/26 08:52:17 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader WebappClassLoader.java WebappLoader.java Log: - Update to use a flag for the anti JAR locking code. It isn't as foolproof as the other one, since you can't just delete a WAR or

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

yoavs 2004/07/26 08:39:13 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory BeanFactory.java webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Addressed Bugzilla 29831. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29826] - Installation always exits with an error code.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

Can someone please unsubscribe me from this list? I have sent about 20 email to unsubscribe and I'm still recieving them. THanks Mike Currie Senior Web Developer New Century Mortgage Direct 949 743 7037 Mobile 949 279 4358 Fax 866 281 0360 > This electronic message transmission contains inform

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29831] - Support for boolean property in bean factory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

yoavs 2004/07/26 08:34:32 Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.bat webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Addressed Bugzilla 29826. Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/setclasspath.bat Index: setclasspath.bat

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone to object, cause it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30324] - ERROR [JkCoyoteHandler] Error in action code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30324] New: - ERROR [JkCoyoteHandler] Error in action code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Mod_ajp initial

Costin Manolache wrote: > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but > > everyone is welcome. > > The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. > > AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. > > But frankly I see no reason

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30322] - Jsp's source directory in task Jasper2 for ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone to object, cause it's open source after all,

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Graham Leggett wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Peace on ASF :) Indeed :) well mod_ajp will probably goes a bit farther than mod_proxy + proxy_ajp since mod_proxy will allways relay static configuration, ie map some knowns URL to knowns Tomcat. Why would mod_proxy always rely on a static configuration

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but for every Coyote JK pool

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30322] New: - Jsp's source directory in task Jasper2 for ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Henri Gomez wrote: Peace on ASF :) Indeed :) well mod_ajp will probably goes a bit farther than mod_proxy + proxy_ajp since mod_proxy will allways relay static configuration, ie map some knowns URL to knowns Tomcat. Why would mod_proxy always rely on a static configuration? Don't forget that a lo

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: I think very few people are actually using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. You've got to back your assertion with some kind of numbers, otherwise it's FUD. As do you. The assertion was based on comments on this mailing list, but we've already established

Re: jk 1.2.6 release - need more binaries

Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, For jk 1.2.6 the following binaries are allready available : Windows (ISAPI/JK for AP 1.3.31/JK for AP2 2.0.50) Linux (JK for Fedora Core 2 Apache 2.0.50, for Suse 8.0 Apache 2.0.50 PPC, for Suse 9.1 Apache 2.0) Solaris (JK for Apache 1.3.31 EAPI/STANDARD) iSeries (A

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Remy Maucherat wrote: I think very few people are actually using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. You've got to back your assertion with some kind of numbers, otherwise it's FUD. As do you. The assertion was based on comments on this mailing list, but we've already established that there is a need f

default charset for text/*

Hello, In our web-app that runs with Tomcat 4.1.29 we set the content-type to "text/xml" in a servlet that serves an XML file. The XML encoding normally is UTF-8. We observed that special characters show up wrong in the browser. Packet sniffing revealed that Tomcat changed the content-type to "

RE: [Launcher] release 1.0

Hi, This seems fine. I'm a little surprised Tomcat has been using Launcher all this time without a formal Launcher released ever made, but hey, life is full of surprises right? ;) Let me know if you need help from our side. (Saying that with my Tomcat hat on). Yoav Shapira Millennium Research In

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java

remm2004/07/26 03:56:55 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup HostConfig.java ContextConfig.java ExpandWar.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java Log: - Add logic for a

jk 1.2.6 release - need more binaries

Hi to all, For jk 1.2.6 the following binaries are allready available : Windows (ISAPI/JK for AP 1.3.31/JK for AP2 2.0.50) Linux (JK for Fedora Core 2 Apache 2.0.50, for Suse 8.0 Apache 2.0.50 PPC, for Suse 9.1 Apache 2.0) Solaris (JK for Apache 1.3.31 EAPI/STANDARD) iSeries (AS/400 V5R2 and UP)

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: The framework itself could be designed in a way which would end up hurting performance. It did happen in Tomcat in the past, and I don't know about mod_proxy since I haven't looked at it, but it could happen. All the framework does is determine that a

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but for every Coyote JK pool configured in server.

TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but for every Coyote JK pool configured in server.xml. For the secon

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Remy Maucherat wrote: The framework itself could be designed in a way which would end up hurting performance. It did happen in Tomcat in the past, and I don't know about mod_proxy since I haven't looked at it, but it could happen. All the framework does is determine that a proxy handler is respon

RE: Mod_ajp initial

Henri Gomez wrote: > Bill Barker wrote: > > > I'm with Graham on this. Personally, I have very little > interest in a > > mod_ajp module, but I am interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_lb, > etc. Of > > course, since j-t-c has long doubled as j-t-sandbox, this > means that > > I'm +0 for commi

[PATCH] proxy lb support - step 1

Hi all, There has been some serious discussion for building load balancing support for mod_proxy. Here is the first in series of patches that will enable this. The patch adds lb support in scoreboard, so that statuses for each lb worker can be calculated for each child process. It uses optional f

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Bill Barker wrote: I'm with Graham on this. Personally, I have very little interest in a mod_ajp module, but I am interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_lb, etc. Of course, since j-t-c has long doubled as j-t-sandbox, this means that I'm +0 for committing your stuff there. Well Mladen has been quick to r

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Remy Maucherat wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Until I'm shown a mod_proxy (with HTTP) with performance close to mod_jk, my opinion is that we can't use it. As I've pointed out already, mod_proxy is a framework. The performance numbers quoted tested mod_proxy_http, not mod_pro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30291] - Wrong smap in expressions and scriptlets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mod_ajp initial

Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Until I'm shown a mod_proxy (with HTTP) with performance close to mod_jk, my opinion is that we can't use it. As I've pointed out already, mod_proxy is a framework. The performance numbers quoted tested mod_proxy_http, not mod_proxy, which doesn't do

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Context.java

remm2004/07/26 01:09:21 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup HostConfig.java ContextRuleSet.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java catalina/src/share/org/ap

RE: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 success

Please take me off this mail list. Many Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 July 2004 10:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 success To whom it may satisfy... This is an automate