Henri Gomez wrote: > Bill Barker wrote: > > > I'm with Graham on this. Personally, I have very little > interest in a > > mod_ajp module, but I am interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_lb, > etc. Of > > course, since j-t-c has long doubled as j-t-sandbox, this > means that > > I'm +0 for committing your stuff there. > > Well Mladen has been quick to release this initial work and I > suspect it will be faster again to make a valid prototype. >
Sure thing :-). > Now we should know who could works on it ? > Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone to object, cause it's open source after all, and it doesn't break nothing that already exists. It will of course produce a lot of reusable code for any preferred framework, that can only be a benefit in long run. Simply speaking we will only have a jk/jk2 functionality in a full-blown optimized Apache2 module. MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
