Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28323] - HttpServletRequest.getPathInfo() returns null in context of a Filter class

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28323] - HttpServletRequest.getPathInfo() returns null in context of a Filter class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28325] New: - Servlet Received Partial Data

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28325] New: - Servlet Received Partial Data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: Re: Your letter

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

Re: Your letter

Please have a look at the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28323] New: - HttpServletRequest.getPathInfo() returns null in context of a Filter class

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28323] New: - HttpServletRequest.getPathInfo() returns null in context of a Filter class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: Gary Butler/CHARBROIL/WCB is out of the office.

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

Gary Butler/CHARBROIL/WCB is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 04/08/2004 and will not return until 04/12/2004. I am out of the office. I will respond when I return. Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28107] - Enhance Tomcat's Ant tasks for easy build.xml configuration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Fwd: PHP/JSR223]

Hi Remy, Remy Maucherat wrote: The high level summary is nice, but more detail is needed for this discussion. What does it mean exactly ? The RI for the JSR is with PHP ? Does the code work already ? Is it OSS ? ;) All excellent questions. I think the answer at the moment is that it's somewhat

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java

remm2004/04/09 14:47:04 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java Log: - If there's a non fatal exception (with validation), no exception will be rethrown by the digester. This will make the webapp startup fail if t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28321] - Tomcat JK2 Connector Memory Leak

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28321] - Tomcat JK2 Connector Memory Leak

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28321] New: - Tomcat JK2 Connector Memory Leak

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28013] - Service install does not set IMAGE_PATH correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28263] - Tomcat 5 installer Windows detects JRE instead of JDK

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27582] - tomcatw.exe and Jdk14 loging

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28013] - Service install does not set IMAGE_PATH correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28107] - Enhance Tomcat's Ant tasks for easy build.xml configuration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 NWGNUmakefile

fuankg 2004/04/09 13:00:18 Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 NWGNUmakefile jk/native/apache-2.0 NWGNUmakefile Log: fix problem with differences between Apache2 build systems of 2.0.x and 2.1.x Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +1 -7 jakarta-tomcat-conn

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Peter Rossbach wrote: Hello Remy, the fix is also usefull at linux and all other systems following with current autodeploy host not working a) copy a webapp at host appBase (webapps dir) b) remove this new deployed application with manager app c) copy the same webapp again at host appB

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Hello Remy, the fix is also usefull at linux and all other systems following with current autodeploy host not working a) copy a webapp at host appBase (webapps dir) b) remove this new deployed application with manager app c) copy the same webapp again at host appBase. Peter PS: Your w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28147] - JasperException for jsp files that are symbolic links

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Amy Roh wrote: Which bug? Sorry, I'm lost. After the i18n patch was committed, there was a leftover _en bundle which missed all the new strings. The fix was obviously trivial (remove the older bundle). Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

> Amy Roh wrote: > > I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out. > > Thanks. The last String related bug was worse though ;) Which bug? Sorry, I'm lost. > > Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

RE: [5.0.22] Release vote

Hi, No problem -- thank YOU for fixing it ;) And a good weekend to all, Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: Amy Roh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 1:39 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: [5.0.22] Release vote > >I'm

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Amy Roh wrote: I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out. Thanks. The last String related bug was worse though ;) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

I'm voting 0 on this, because of one bug I found: - Logging into Admin webapp, clicking on Connector (8080) brings up an error page: javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Missing message for key "connector.useBodyEncodingForURI" I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out. Amy ---

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources.properties

amyroh 2004/04/09 10:35:33 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources.properties Log: Add missing keys - connector.useBodyEncodingForURI allowTrace. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Jess Holle wrote: Given all the time and energy you put into this Remy, I can completely understand. On the flip side, the overall community would be best served by getting as solid of a point release as possible out sooner rather than later. If the current 5.0.22 tag is the best you/we have ti

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Remy Maucherat wrote: Jess Holle wrote: I'm not a committer, but... Given the number of "did you get _ important fix xyz _?" mails, it seems to make sense to re-tag. It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to have a public release with this latest flurry of fixes (

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Remy Maucherat wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I don't think we should relase a "stable" with a few bugs we can fix easily, a lot of people don't read the release notes, and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time later anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, f

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I don't think we should relase a "stable" with a few bugs we can fix easily, a lot of people don't read the release notes, and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time later anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, from different committers

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Jess Holle wrote: I'm not a committer, but... Given the number of "did you get _ important fix xyz _?" mails, it seems to make sense to re-tag. It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to have a public release with this latest flurry of fixes (i.e. so maybe the publi

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Peter Rossbach wrote: Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No I vote -1 Autodeploy with HostConfig not working correct with Windows. see my bug report with a fix. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28262 Windows is a very broken platform, and I don't quite care about this issue

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now). Anoth

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19049] - Nested Exceptions result in confusing error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java

markt 2004/04/09 09:42:29 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag: tomcat_4_branch PageContextImpl.java Log: - Fix bug19049. Clarify error message when nesting exceptions. - Patch provided by Joseph Shraibman. - Ported from TC5. Rev

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java

markt 2004/04/09 09:40:13 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag: tomcat_4_branch PageContextImpl.java Log: Fixing indents prior to actually changing the code. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java

markt 2004/04/09 09:35:12 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java Log: - Fix bug19049. Clarify error message when nesting exceptions. - Patch provided by Joseph Shraibman. Revision ChangesPath 1.59 +2 -1

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java

markt 2004/04/09 09:31:29 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java Log: Fixing indents prior to actually changing the code. Revision ChangesPath 1.58 +6 -7 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/ap

RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just backwards from JK)

> -Original Message- > From: Angus Mezick > > Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back > then. I wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk > lbfactor and jk2 lb_factor behave the same. That assumption > is now dead. If you reply to my email with the

RE: JK2 LB_FACTOR problem

Back to that march 1 post. > 1. lb_value += lb_factor Ok, I see this I think. But this happens after step 2. > 2. the highest lb_value gets server; Am I reading this code wrong, or is it the LOWEST value that is getting the server /** Get one worker that is ready */ for( level=0;

RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just backwards from JK)

Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back then. I wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk lbfactor and jk2 lb_factor behave the same. That assumption is now dead. If you reply to my email with the series of questions about this I will be happy to do the docs. --An

RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just backwards from JK)

> -Original Message- > From: Angus Mezick > > So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2 > lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING > to do with load balancing. > They definetly don't seem to do the same thing. I gave you detailed explanation how the l

Need help creating a JK2 Docs Patch

I am trying to figure out this JK2 load balancing code and fix the docs. I need some help verifying some of the coding decisions that have been made. Ok, as I dig deeper into the code, I discover the following: Both worker:AJP13 and channel.socket can have both the level and lb_factor parameters T

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28072] - The TomCat can't be started.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just backwards from JK)

So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2 lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING to do with load balancing. They definetly don't seem to do the same thing. --Angus > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 0

RE: [5.0.22] Release vote

Hi, I don't think we should relase a "stable" with a few bugs we can fix >easily, >a lot of people don't read the release notes, >and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time later >anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, from different >committers, so I think it

RE: [5.0.22] Release vote

> > Release 5.0.22 as Stable: > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > [x] Prefer not to :) > -0 I don't think we should relase a "stable" with a few bugs we can fix easily, a lot of people don't read the release notes, and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time later anyway. There were seve

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No I vote -1 Autodeploy with HostConfig not working correct with Windows. see my bug report with a fix. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28262 Regards Peter Remy Maucherat schrieb: Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No I've tested the n

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

I'm not a committer, but... Given the number of "did you get _ important fix xyz _?" mails, it seems to make sense to re-tag. It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to have a public release with this latest flurry of fixes (i.e. so maybe the public release is consi

Re: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just backwards from JK)

Angus Mezick wrote: I forgot to mention that I am using the following software: Apache: apache_2.0.47-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi JK2: mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll AND the 2.0.4 mod_jk.so from the jakarta site. Tomcat: 4.1.27 -Original Message- From: Angus Mezick Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 9:44 AM To

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now). Another "risky" change i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28313] New: - Invalid redirect after successful FORM-based authentication

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [5.0.22] Release vote

Hi, > >Release 5.0.22 as Stable: >[ ] Yes >[ ] No > I'm voting 0 on this, because of one bug I found: - Logging into Admin webapp, clicking on Connector (8080) brings up an error page: javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Missing message for key "connector.useBodyEncodingForURI" org.apache.struts.ta

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [X ] Yes [ ] No I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now). Another "risky" chang

RE: [5.0.22] Release vote

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat > > There was a bug in the service.bat (now fixed in the CVS) caused by > > missing quotations. > > Can you repack only those tree? > > No. > Ok then, It will manifest only when Tomcat installed in path having spaces, but only for manual ins

Re: [5.0.22] Release vote

Mladen Turk wrote There was a bug in the service.bat (now fixed in the CVS) caused by missing quotations. I've also updated the prunsvc so that manager gets shut down on uninstall, and -Xss now uses KB instead Bytes, so you don't need to round that yourself on the 1024 byte boundary. Can you repack

RE: [5.0.22] Release vote

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:00 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [5.0.22] Release vote > Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [x] Yes [ ] No > I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me There w

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat5w.exe tomcat5.exe

mturk 2004/04/09 05:21:00 Modified:procrun/bin tomcat5w.exe tomcat5.exe Log: Latest binary builds Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +127 -133 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat5w.exe <> 1.2 +94 -96jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bi

Re:(ID-number: 274972) [5.0.22] Release vote

Dear Tomcat Developers List, The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software Support Desk with the Title of "[5.0.22] Release vote" has been given the following ID-number: 274972 Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply to this e-mail. Please use the below URL i

[5.0.22] Release vote

Release 5.0.22 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now). Another "risky" change is the upgrade to Xerces

Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 04/09/2004 and will not return until 04/13/2004. I would be pleased to respond to your email upon my return. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EM

Re:(ID-number: 274879) Hi, it's me

Dear Tomcat Developers List, The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software Support Desk with the Title of "Hi, it's me" has been given the following ID-number: 274879 Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply to this e-mail. Please use the below URL if you wish

Hi, it's me

Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Autoreply: Re:(ID-number: 274864) cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

Re:(ID-number: 274864) cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java

Dear Tomcat Developers List, The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software Support Desk with the Title of "cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java" has been given the following ID-number: 274864 Please do not change the Subject line if you

Autoreply: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java

hgomez 2004/04/09 01:22:30 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java Log: Set the RMI port to the one provided in parameter. If not, MX4J will use the default one, 1099, and JRMP adaptor won't be able to access service Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +2 -0

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] - Unable to specify an output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] - Unable to specify an output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] - Unable to specify an output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] - Unable to specify an output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] - Unable to specify output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] - Unable to specify output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] New: - Unable to specify output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28305] New: - Unable to specify output file for redirection of stdout/stderr in catalina.sh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Autoreply: Re:(ID-number: 274839) Autoreply: Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

Re:(ID-number: 274839) Autoreply: Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

Dear Tomcat Developers List, The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software Support Desk with the Title of "Autoreply: Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office." has been given the following ID-number: 274839 Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply to this

Autoreply: Re:(ID-number: 274838) Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

Re:(ID-number: 274838) Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

Dear Tomcat Developers List, The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software Support Desk with the Title of "Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office." has been given the following ID-number: 274838 Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply to this e-mail. Plea

Autoreply: Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

Hello, Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp We apology for the inconvenience. Best Regards, -- The DirectXtras Team - DirectXtras - Xtr

Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 04/09/2004 and will not return until 04/13/2004. I would be pleased to respond to your email upon my return. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EM