Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi, I don't think we should relase a "stable" with a few bugs we can fix
easily, a lot of people don't read the release notes, and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time
later
anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, from different committers, so I think it would benefit us to cut a new tag.
If I am the only one that feels like this, then I will redraw my vote.
You're not the only one, I agree.
Oki, no release then. I don't care at all, and don't expect a new tag for weeks. I'm really really tired of the "wait, you tagged five minutes ago, and you forgot my all important patch" attitude.
Given all the time and energy you put into this Remy, I can completely understand.
On the flip side, the overall community would be best served by getting as solid of a point release as possible out sooner rather than later.
If the current 5.0.22 tag is the best you/we have time/energy for, then that seems better than 5.0.19.
If the plan was to release furiously every couple of weeks or something than I believe everyone's release criteria would be simply "better than the last public release".
Given that you don't expect to tag for "weeks", which I would assume means more like 4-5 than 2 (and would completely understand and concur with this decision as no one can keep up with releases happening every week or two anyway and this sponges up too much time doing release management), then there is a desire to try to get as many of the fixes in process into each public release -- rather than having to refer the masses to CVS for weeks...
-- Jess Holle
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
