Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back then. I wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk lbfactor and jk2 lb_factor behave the same. That assumption is now dead. If you reply to my email with the series of questions about this I will be happy to do the docs. --Angus
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 12:07 PM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just > backwards from JK) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Angus Mezick > > > > So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2 > > lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING > > to do with load balancing. > > They definetly don't seem to do the same thing. > > I gave you detailed explanation how the lb algorithm in JK2 > works replying > to your post on the Tomcat Users list on March 1st. > So once again it's not percentage but rather relation between > lb workers. > Remember that when lb gets reset on 255, so it's just a simple math. > > > Perhaps we could document that better or do the math by ourself. > > > MT. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
