Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

tions you should be able to see the process gone about to supervise something. Go backwards to unsupervise it. HTH - Original Message - From: Mike Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: toaster@shupp.org Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:55:10 2008 Subject: Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.

Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

UN-supervise it? > > > > Regards, > > > > Tren > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Mike Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: shupp-toaster mailing list > > Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:09:23 2008 > > Subject: [toaster] clamav:

Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

Original Message - > From: Mike Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: shupp-toaster mailing list > Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:09:23 2008 > Subject: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ??? > > Please, advise. > > What is required to upgrade my toasters (many !!!) from

Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

ell. Regards, Tren - Original Message - From: Mike Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: toaster@shupp.org Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:48:44 2008 Subject: Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ??? We are running Debian exclusively. Recently, I discovered deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-vola

Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

From: Mike Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: shupp-toaster mailing list > > Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:09:23 2008 > > Subject: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ??? > > > > Please, advise. > > > > What is required to upgrade my toasters (many

Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

Tren > > - Original Message - > From: Mike Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: shupp-toaster mailing list > Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:09:23 2008 > Subject: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ??? > > Please, advise. > > What is required to upgrade my toasters (ma

Re: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

ter mailing list Sent: Tue Sep 09 19:09:23 2008 Subject: [toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ??? Please, advise. What is required to upgrade my toasters (many !!!) from clamav 0.90.2, which is the latest in Bill's Linux Qmail Toaster v. 0.9.2, to clamav "WARNING: Local version: 0.

[toaster] clamav: 0.90.2 ==> 0.94 ???

Please, advise. What is required to upgrade my toasters (many !!!) from clamav 0.90.2, which is the latest in Bill's Linux Qmail Toaster v. 0.9.2, to clamav "WARNING: Local version: 0.90.2 Recommended version: 0.94" ??? According to here: we _require_

[toaster] ClamAV 0.92.1

Hi, Has anyone successfully upgrade the toaster with ClamAV 0.92.1 yet? Does it need to be patched with clamav-0.90.2.patch or it can do without it? thanks

[toaster] clamav

Hi, Has anyone successfully run shupp toaster with clamav 0.92.1? Regards

[toaster] ClamAV 0.90.2 and PDF-Support

Hello! I just upgraded to clamav 0.90.2. Did anyone test PDF support? What is the threat? What are your opinions about it? Claas - clamd daemon 0.90.2 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686) Log file size limited to 1048576 bytes. Reading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav Loaded 109606

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.90.1 ???

Michael D Schleif wrote: > We want to upgrade our clamav. We have found patches for 0.90.0: > > > > We cannot find: clamav-0.90.0. > > Are the above referenced patches ALSO OK for clamav-0.90.1 ??? > > What do you think? Don't

[toaster] clamav-0.90.1 ???

We want to upgrade our clamav. We have found patches for 0.90.0: We cannot find: clamav-0.90.0. Are the above referenced patches ALSO OK for clamav-0.90.1 ??? What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237

Re: [toaster] ClamAV 0.90 & SimScan 1.3.1

Guido: loot at: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.simscan/2827 regards, *Ingo Claro F.* Gerente de Operaciones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+56-2) 43 00 155 NetRed S.A. Certificado ISO 9001:2000 Guido Quiram escrib

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Bill Shupp wrote: >> I do have this side-effect also. I added LogTime to the file, and >> first of the lines has the time, but the >> second one does not. > > I'm seeing this as well. I suspect the shared/output.c patch might be > responsible, I'll look more closely when I have time. It appea

Re: [toaster] ClamAV 0.90 & SimScan 1.3.1

Hi, just upgraded to SimScan v1.3.1 as well, and mails are coming in, however, I see error messages in the logs: - simscan: connect error 2 - remote rcpt <> : temporary DNS problem [might not be related] For the installation I basically followed Bill's instructions. Any thoughts? Thanks, Guid

Re: [toaster] ClamAV 0.90 & SimScan 1.3.1

Hello! > Has anyone done a new install with the new ClamAV V0.90 and SimScan > V1.3.1? I have. > SimScan configure is looking for a daily.cvd and current ClamAV > doesn't have one. Tried creating an empty file but simscanmk -g is too > smart for that. > Suggestions? Comments? Use: --enable-rec

[toaster] ClamAV 0.90 & SimScan 1.3.1

Has anyone done a new install with the new ClamAV V0.90 and SimScan V1.3.1? SimScan configure is looking for a daily.cvd and current ClamAV doesn't have one. Tried creating an empty file but simscanmk -g is too smart for that. Suggestions? Comments? Bill Rowe

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Sam Laffere wrote: > I am still running as clamav. I did not need to make any changes here This is correct. There is no need to run as simscan in the default setup. >> Second, there is a strange side-effect in /var/log/clamd/current. Each >> line of clamd is being logged twice. >> >> > I do

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Bill, Thanks for the updated files. I just upgraded my installation, and wanted to post what I found. Claas Langbehn wrote: First of all, I needed to run clamd as user simscan, as adding clamav to the group simscan did not help. I think it is because setuidgid drops additional groups. Now it

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Good Morning! > simscan: connect error 2 I found out, what causes this. There is a P0F function that is not documented, yet. You can deactivate it by adding NOP0FCHECK="1" to your /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp and run qmailctl cdb afterwards. For example: :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Hello, one more strange thing: Even though the infected emails are detected, simscan throws up an error before. simscan: connect error 2 simscan:[4367]:VIRUS:0.0688s:Eicar-Test-Signature:81.169.123.251::[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does anyone know what "connect error 2" is about? - Claas

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Hello Bill, I just tried the three patches and I want to give you some feedback: First of all, I needed to run clamd as user simscan, as adding clamav to the group simscan did not help. I think it is because setuidgid drops additional groups. Now it works. See my /var/qmail/supervise/clamd/run:

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

At 18.10 18/02/2007, you wrote: I had to go back at 0.88.x as CPU usage becomes extremely high and clamd hangs. Anyone has the same problem? I use FreeBSD. Clamav docs say on FreeBSD and Solaris 0.90 has serious problems. Tonino Tonino At 19.39 14/02/2007, you wrote: I've posted patche

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

I had to go back at 0.88.x as CPU usage becomes extremely high and clamd hangs. Anyone has the same problem? Tonino At 19.39 14/02/2007, you wrote: I've posted patches for for clamav 0.90 for use with the standard toaster install: http://shupp.org/patches/clamav-0.90-conf.patch http://shupp.

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: One thing to keep in mind, if you are not using the :attach in simcontrol, do NOT enable rip mime in simscan as that will cause clamdscan to basically scan the message and the attachment twice. Clamav does a very good job of scanning encode

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Tom Collins wrote: On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Bill Shupp wrote: I've installed these patches on my system, and they are working as expected. Bill, Have you (or anyone for that matter) seen any performance improvements from the new version? I noticed this line from the Release Notes: "T

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Tom Collins wrote: > On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Bill Shupp wrote: >> I've installed these patches on my >> system, and they are working as expected. > > Bill, > > Have you (or anyone for that matter) seen any performance improvements > from the new version? I noticed this line from the Releas

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Bill Shupp wrote: I've installed these patches on my system, and they are working as expected. Bill, Have you (or anyone for that matter) seen any performance improvements from the new version? I noticed this line from the Release Notes: "The email decoding

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Ahmet YAZICI wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi Bill, >> >> When I did upgraded to Clamav to 0.90 my toaster box . >> I cant received any mail. >> >> /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current says: >> ERROR: Parse error at line 39: Option LogClean requires boolean argument. >> >> /var/log/clamd/current say

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bill, When I did upgraded to Clamav to 0.90 my toaster box . I cant received any mail. /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current says: ERROR: Parse error at line 39: Option LogClean requires boolean argument. /var/log/clamd/current says: ERROR: Parse error at line 39: Option Log

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

Hi Bill, When I did upgraded to Clamav to 0.90 my toaster box . I cant received any mail. /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current says: ERROR: Parse error at line 39: Option LogClean requires boolean argument. /var/log/clamd/current says: ERROR: Parse error at line 39: Option LogClean requires boolean arg

[toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

I've posted patches for for clamav 0.90 for use with the standard toaster install: http://shupp.org/patches/clamav-0.90-conf.patch http://shupp.org/patches/clamav-0.90-freshclamconf.patch http://shupp.org/patches/clamav-0.90-stderr.patch Thanks to Dave Watson and Stephan Seitz, both of whom submi

Re: [toaster] ClamAV Error

According to ClamAV - the latest version is 0.88.2 so that might be the problem. I should have looked before I posted. Yeah I did stop it before installing. It even reports as the right version and the file dates on all the installed files (the library, etc) are all current. Thanks; Mic

Re: [toaster] ClamAV Error

On Saturday 06 May 2006 19:49, Michael R. Bagnall wrote: Did you stop clam while you installed it? How about freshclam too? > This morning I did an update on my Clam AV from the toaster site and > I am getting this error in my log when I reload: > > @4000445c8c52170420c4 +++ Started at Sat Ma

[toaster] ClamAV Error

This morning I did an update on my Clam AV from the toaster site and I am getting this error in my log when I reload: @4000445c8c52170420c4 +++ Started at Sat May 6 06:45:12 2006 @4000445c8c5217042c7c clamd daemon 0.88.1 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686) @4000445c8c52170434

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.2

On Wednesday 03 May 2006 14:00, Sim wrote: > # patch -p0 <../tar/clamav-0.88.1-conf.patch > patching file etc/clamd.conf > > # patch -p0 <../tar/clamav-0.88.1-freshclamconf.patch > patching file etc/freshclam.conf > > # patch -p0 <../tar/clamav-0.88.1-stderr.patch > patching file ./clamd/clamd.

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.2

# patch -p0 <../tar/clamav-0.88.1-conf.patch patching file etc/clamd.conf # patch -p0 <../tar/clamav-0.88.1-freshclamconf.patch patching file etc/freshclam.conf # patch -p0 <../tar/clamav-0.88.1-stderr.patch patching file ./clamd/clamd.c patching file ./shared/output.c patching file ./shared

[toaster] clamav-0.88.2

The patches for 0.88.1 appear to be working for clamav-0.88.2, but with some offsets. Here is the output: patching file ./clamd/clamd.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 138 (offset 1 line). patching file ./shared/output.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 121 (offset 6 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 158 (offset 6 lines).

Re: [toaster] Clamav- Simscan - Test Antivirus #15 Error

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:35:52 +0300 Adi Pircalabu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.rantoloblog.it/download/Email-TEST.zip > > Here you have a uuencoded EICAR. The infected part must be detected. > Please contact Clamav and/or Simscan developers. Here's what I've got after some testing: h

Re: [toaster] Clamav- Simscan - Test Antivirus #15 Error

(Cc-ed to the toaster list since there could be other subscribers interested) On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:07:18 +0200 Gabriele Furlotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the link : > > http://www.rantoloblog.it/download/Email-TEST.zip Here you have a uuencoded EICAR. The infected part must be det

Re: [toaster] Clamav- Simscan - Test Antivirus

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:12:36 +0200 Gabriele Furlotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've recently installed qmailtoaster 0.8.7 complete with clamav and > simscan but it failed on test #15-#22-#23 on > http://www.webmail.us/testvirus. #22 and #23 mails do not contain virii, so an antivirus should

[toaster] Clamav- Simscan - Test Antivirus

I've recently installed qmailtoaster 0.8.7 complete with clamav and simscan but it failed on test #15-#22-#23 on http://www.webmail.us/testvirus. Any idea about . . . thanks to everybody. ( Sorry for my bad english ) Gabriele [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rantoloblog.it/

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1

On Friday 07 Apr 2006 11:30, Nikki Locke wrote: > I guess it's about time I contributed something :-) > > The problem with the patch seems to be that they have renamed the FILE > handle for the log file from logg_fd to logg_fs. I have "patched the > patch", and it seems to work. > > Mailing this pa

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1

I guess it's about time I contributed something :-) The problem with the patch seems to be that they have renamed the FILE handle for the log file from logg_fd to logg_fs. I have "patched the patch", and it seems to work. Mailing this patch in plain text may wrap some of the lines (line 7 almos

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1

On 05/04/2006 Bob Hutchinson wrote: One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) I'm running the toaster with clamav from Debian volatile (0.88) with no patches and everything seems fine - can someone tell me what the patches do? I dont run with custom error messages setup on qmail either as I

Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1

Bob Hutchinson wrote: > clamav-0.88.1 came out today. > > One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) > > patching file ./clamd/clamd.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 138 (offset 1 line). > patching file ./shared/output.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 115. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 158 (offset 6 lines). > 1 out of 2 hu

[toaster] clamav-0.88.1

clamav-0.88.1 came out today. One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) patching file ./clamd/clamd.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 138 (offset 1 line). patching file ./shared/output.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 115. Hunk #2 succeeded at 158 (offset 6 lines). 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./sha

[toaster] Clamav patches

The toaster patches clamav with 3 patches - are they necessary? I ask because I run the toaster without simscan at the moment (I do scanning separately with maildrop + clamav). I'd like to move to a simscan installation, but my clamav comes from the debian volatile package and I'd rather keep i

[toaster] ClamAV version not up to date

Dear toaster members, The clamav db are regularly updated but in the mail header still display the old update pattern so I run /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g to update it and it works normally I don't need to run this as often, something wrong with my toaster installation, something I mist, I sea

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

On Saturday 04 Feb 2006 16:42, Tom Collins wrote: > On Feb 3, 2006, at 10:58 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: > > **Unmatched Entries** > >Received signal: wake up: 478 Time(s) > >WARNING: Current functionality level = 6, recommended = 7: 142 > > Time(s) > >WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTD

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

On Feb 3, 2006, at 10:58 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: **Unmatched Entries** Received signal: wake up: 478 Time(s) WARNING: Current functionality level = 6, recommended = 7: 142 Time(s) WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!: 420 Time(s) DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/faq.html

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

On Saturday 04 Feb 2006 06:58, Bill Rowe wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:53:42 -0700, Bill Rowe wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:52:44 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote: > >> Tom Collins wrote: > >>> On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: > Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clam

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:53:42 -0700, Bill Rowe wrote: > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:52:44 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote: > >> Tom Collins wrote: >> >>> On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clamav V0.87. Upgraded to V0.88 just recently.

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:52:44 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote: > Tom Collins wrote: > >> On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: >>> Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clamav >>> V0.87. >>> Upgraded to V0.88 just recently. Everything seems ok BUT the >>> update >>> email I get each d

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

Tom Collins wrote: > On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: >> Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clamav V0.87. >> Upgraded to V0.88 just recently. Everything seems ok BUT the update >> email I get each day claims that I'm running a mixture of V0.87 & >> V0.88. I've checke

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Bill Rowe wrote: Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clamav V0.87. Upgraded to V0.88 just recently. Everything seems ok BUT the update email I get each day claims that I'm running a mixture of V0.87 & V0.88. I've checked everywhere that I can think o

Re: [toaster] Clamav upgrade

Bill Rowe wrote: Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clamav V0.87. Upgraded to V0.88 just recently. Everything seems ok BUT the update email I get each day claims that I'm running a mixture of V0.87 & V0.88. I've checked everywhere that I can think of but solution eludes me.

[toaster] Clamav upgrade

Did a Toaster install about 6 weeks ago and included Clamav V0.87. Upgraded to V0.88 just recently. Everything seems ok BUT the update email I get each day claims that I'm running a mixture of V0.87 & V0.88. I've checked everywhere that I can think of but solution eludes me. Obviously I should ha

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.86.2

Bob Hutchinson wrote: On Monday 25 Jul 2005 13:52, Christopher Grello wrote: Quoting Bob Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Just to confirm that the 0.85 patches work with clamav 0.86.2, released this morning -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com - What patches

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.86.2

On Monday 25 Jul 2005 13:52, Christopher Grello wrote: > Quoting Bob Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Just to confirm that the 0.85 patches work with clamav 0.86.2, released > > this morning > > > > > > -- > > - > > Bob Hutchinson > > Midwales dot com > > - > > Wh

[toaster] clamav 0.86.2

Just to confirm that the 0.85 patches work with clamav 0.86.2, released this morning -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -

Re: [toaster] clamav, spamassassin update

On Friday 08 Jul 2005 09:02, Neofema s.r.o. - tech wrote: > Thanks it helped. > > But for example clamav should know that its internal database have been > updated, isn't it?! > > In normal way I'd simply restart clamd but how to do it through that > supervise? > is there any script that restart a

Re: [toaster] clamav, spamassassin update

clamav noticed itself if you run freshclam to update the database. take a look in the qmailctl script, there you see the way the services where started and stoped. btw. it's better to stop the clamd before run a make install of a new version. Neofema s.r.o. - tech schrieb: Thanks it help

Re: [toaster] clamav, spamassassin update

Thanks it helped. But for example clamav should know that its internal database have been updated, isn't it?! In normal way I'd simply restart clamd but how to do it through that supervise? is there any script that restart all services run through supervise? Thanks, Roman rene marticke n

Re: [toaster] clamav, spamassassin update

Neofema s.r.o. - tech schrieb: Hi, I successfully installed toaster on Gentoo (x64 and also AMD64) - I will post differences later so that it can be added to toaster ;-) But I have one maybe silly question. I updated spamassassin to 3.0.4 but there's still X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssas

[toaster] clamav, spamassassin update

Hi, I successfully installed toaster on Gentoo (x64 and also AMD64) - I will post differences later so that it can be added to toaster ;-) But I have one maybe silly question. I updated spamassassin to 3.0.4 but there's still X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2-gr1 (2004-11-16) on dom

[toaster] clamav-0.86

The toaster patches for clamav-0.85.1 work fine with clamav-0.86, which came out yesterday -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -

Re: [toaster] clamav problem

On Friday 27 May 2005 19:43, Tom Collins wrote: > On May 27, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Bob Hutchinson wrote: > > clamdscan: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to > > map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory > > Increase the softlimit in the run file for qmail-smptd. bin

Re: [toaster] clamav problem

On May 27, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Bob Hutchinson wrote: clamdscan: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory Increase the softlimit in the run file for qmail-smptd. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmail

[toaster] clamav problem

Hi all, This is about an install of clamav on Debian testing and set up to run with qmail, according to the toaster. I have done this install a couple of times with no problems at all, working with simscan, but this install is giving problems. This line appears in the qmail smtpd log: clamdscan

[toaster] clamav

I received the following error when running clamav on my toaster Any ideas on how to solve this?   2005-03-21 10:11:27.954654500 LibClamAV Error: cl_loaddbdir(): Can't open directory /var/lib/clamav2005-03-21 10:11:27.954879500 ERROR: Unable to open file or directory Regards, Michael DiMa