Hi Rich,
At 12:12 PM 04-04-2025, Salz, Rich wrote:
I spoke with Scott Bradner. He said the error was there from the
very first draft and it should probably be RFC 2026 which talks
about disclosure. So you should probably assume that this has been
overtaken by the Note Well.
Thanks for the ab
There is the following sentence in RFC 2418: "WG participants should
specifically note the requirements for disclosure of conflicts of
interest in [2].". The referenced document is RFC 2028. I could not
find any requirements in RFC 2028 or the document which replaced it.
You brought this up on t
There is the following sentence in RFC 2418: "WG participants should
specifically note the requirements for disclosure of conflicts of
interest in [2].". The referenced document is RFC 2028. I could not
find any requirements in RFC 2028 or the document which replaced it.
You brought this up on t
Dear TLS Working Group Chairs,
I sent the email below on 1 March to the three email addresses which
were listed in the datatracker. I did not receive a reply. I am
resending the email.
- email -
Thank you for the reminder about the procedures.
There is the following sentence in RFC 2418:
> On Mar 1, 2025, at 12:57 PM, Muhammad Usama Sardar
> wrote:
>
> On 01.03.25 06:27, Sean Turner wrote:
>
>> • Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or
>> technical concerns (from RFC 3683)
>
> Could the chairs please clarify about the announcement of side m
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM Muhammad Usama Sardar <
muhammad_usama.sar...@tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> On 01.03.25 06:27, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> • Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or
> technical concerns (from RFC 3683)
>
> Could the chairs please clarify about
On 01.03.25 06:27, Sean Turner wrote:
• Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or
technical concerns (from RFC 3683)
Could the chairs please clarify about the announcement of side meetings
on the mailing list in the FAQ [1]?
More specifically, like John, I t
