Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 3:24 PM Martin Thomson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, at 10:46, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > I think the current working group consensus for the policy of the > > recommended column is reflected in the following statement: > > > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" in the "Recomme

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

mson Date: Monday, 30 January 2023 at 00:25 To: tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, at 10:46, Joseph Salowey wrote: > I think the current working group consensus for the policy of the > recommended column is reflected in the followi

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, at 10:46, Joseph Salowey wrote: > I think the current working group consensus for the policy of the > recommended column is reflected in the following statement: > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" in the "Recommended" column requires IETF > Standards Action [RFC8126 >

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

This is right. I don’t think it needs to be more difficult. thanks, Rob On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 15:47 Joseph Salowey wrote: > I think the current working group consensus for the policy of the > recommended column is reflected in the following statement: > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" in the

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

I think the current working group consensus for the policy of the recommended column is reflected in the following statement: Setting a value to "Y" or "D" in the "Recommended" column requires IETF Standards Action [RFC8126 <#RFC8126>]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D" value requires I

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

It is not hard to see that e.g., NULL encryption violates the properties. Sure. And for years we thought MD5 met the properties, until it didn’t. And now, RSA meets the properties, until it doesn’t. The alternative is that someone afterwards need to write a standards track draft and progress

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 06:25:39PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > > > This draft looks good. > > > > One nit, omitted "TLS" before SignatureAlgorithm in two places in > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.ht

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 06:25:39PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > This draft looks good. > > One nit, omitted "TLS" before SignatureAlgorithm in two places in > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.html#section-15-3 Would it be appropriate to clarify the status of Ed25519 in

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Salz, Rich Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 6:17 PM To: John Mattsson ; TLS@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt As one of the designated experts, I would rather not make that judgement call.

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

aphic algorithm or a mechanism that might cause interoperability problems in deployment.” as “D” Discouraged. Cheers, John From: TLS on behalf of John Mattsson Date: Thursday, 12 January 2023 at 07:09 To: tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt Hi

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

ight cause interoperability problems in deployment.” as “D” Discouraged. Cheers, John From: TLS on behalf of John Mattsson Date: Thursday, 12 January 2023 at 07:09 To: tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt Hi, I really like the updates to the Recommended column.

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

quot; Seems to be different from the general rule above. - "IESG Approval is REQUIRED for a Y->N transition." Also Y->D I assume Cheers, John From: TLS on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org Date: Monday, 24 October 2022 at 18:32 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: tls@ietf.org Sub

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

This draft looks good. One nit, omitted "TLS" before SignatureAlgorithm in two places in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.html#section-15-3 ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF. Title : IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS Authors : Joe Salowey Sean Turner