On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 3:24 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, at 10:46, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > I think the current working group consensus for the policy of the > > recommended column is reflected in the following statement: > > > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" in the "Recommended" column requires IETF > > Standards Action [RFC8126 > > <https://betaapp.fastmail.com/mail/IETF.tls/compose?u=47c94097#RFC8126>]. > > > Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D" value requires IESG > > Approval." > > This is my position, so don't change it :) John wants to mark a ton of > things with "D". I think that a good number of the things he asks for > should be marked "D", but I wouldn't want an expert to be put in that > position. "Y" and "D" are both effective statements because they come with > the "authority" of the IETF (for what that is worth). To require any lesser > process than consensus would undermine the value of the label. > In case there was any doubt, I was also agreeing with Joseph Salowey further up in the thread. Martin's elaboration here is fine by me, but Joseph did well to write the literal consensus text. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
