Laurel Fan wrote:
>
> Excerpts from linuxchix: 24-Feb-100 Re: [techtalk] Mandrake 7.0.. by
> Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I am running wu-ftpd-2.6.0-3mdk.i586
>
> Have you set up the ftp user and the ftp account?
> (check by doing:
>
> grep ftp /etc/passwd
>
> ls /home/ftp
>
> ftp://ftp.cert.o
Try login:anonymous password:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTH,
Harry Hoffman
Product Systems Specialist
Restaurants Unlimited Inc.
206.634.3082 x. 270
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Phil Savoie wrote:
> J B wrote:
> >
> > Login to to anon with "anonymous" and no password...it will let you in and
> > download...did
conf file is /etc/ftpaccess (did anyone post that yet? i've been
slacking)
man ftpaccess should fill you in, but make sure 'anonymous' appears in the
'class' line.
it's ok in mdk6.1, although there was a file missing for telnet :P , which
could be a factor for your ftp prob, too.
--mandi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Try login:anonymous password:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> HTH,
Sorry Buds, This didn't do it either. Weird...
>
> Harry Hoffman
> Product Systems Specialist
> Restaurants Unlimited Inc.
> 206.634.3082 x. 270
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Phil Savoie wrote:
>
> > J B wrote:
>
Sorry Robert!
That's what happens when my plum-sized bran
tries to read/write two emails at once!
Walt
-~
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects.
Will Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Telnet works fine so is not an issue. I have included anonymous in the
class line in ftpaccess and now have a different error instead of just
"login failed", I now get:
[root@dell1 /home]# ftp phil
Connected to phil.
220 phil.pszone1 FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 4 19:41:20 GMT
2000)
> Sorry Robert!
>
> That's what happens when my plum-sized bran
> tries to read/write two emails at once!
Thank you very much. No harm done, but it is a shock
to be called by someone else's name.
--
stop http://www.mainmatter.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.o
mwahahaha... now for the newbie questions...
what is it used for?
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Hi All!
I partitioned my HD using Partition Magic, and it goofed up my linux
partition,... I managed to get it up and running,.. by re-inserting the
Linux install disk and "upgrading". I have a new problem now though. When
I login into the KDE, I get desktop icons, but no "taskbar" (I don't kno
lady crowe wrote:
>
> mwahahaha... now for the newbie questions...
> what is it used for?
> __
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Well, i just used it this m
> Well, i just used it this morning to generate a PDF file (Portable
> Document Format) which is read by adobe acrobat reader.
>
> Not on linux :/ but sun. (Waiting for ADSL before I attempt that
> monstrous download)
Unfortunately, there are a lot of things you can't do with the linux
version
Storm,
>From your home directory, do an ls -la and it will show you all of the
files in that directory, including the one running Xwindows.
For example, look for the .fvwmrc file. Open it in a text editor and do a
search for the word task. You'll see that there is a choice there to
activate ei
The taskbar is called kpanel. It should reside in the same place as the
kde bin's. If you can open kfm you can click "File/Run" and type in
kpanel to launch it. If it is not coming up automatically, you may need
to type in "usekde" at the command line or remove the .kde directory in
your home dir.
Nancy Corbett wrote:
>
> Storm,
> >From your home directory, do an ls -la and it will show you all of the
> files in that directory, including the one running Xwindows.
>
> For example, look for the .fvwmrc file. Open it in a text editor and do a
> search for the word task. You'll see that the
#if Storm
> [...] When I login into the KDE, I get desktop icons, but no "taskbar" [...]
Ok, what you call the taskbar is probably called 'kpanel', which is
the big panel thing with the 'K' button, the desktop switching buttons,
and usually the task switching thing (the taskbar :) on top of it.
#if [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> this is wrong.
> [...]
> try changing your .xinitrc (the file that _really_ configures X-windows
> startup) to read something like:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> kfm &
> kpanel &
> exec kwm
Heh, good try but this isn't right either :)
All .xinitrc should contain is 'exec startk
#if Shad Young
> The taskbar is called kpanel. It should reside in the same place as the
> kde bin's. If you can open kfm you can click "File/Run" and type in
> kpanel to launch it. If it is not coming up automatically, you may need
> to type in "usekde" at the command line or remove the .kde dire
Rik Hemsley wrote:
>
> #if [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > this is wrong.
> > [...]
> > try changing your .xinitrc (the file that _really_ configures X-windows
> > startup) to read something like:
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> >
> > kfm &
> > kpanel &
> > exec kwm
>
> Heh, good try but this isn't right either :)
#if [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > All .xinitrc should contain is 'exec startkde'
>
> eeerp? for what version[s]?
>
> this works fine on my system (seemingly), but then, i think i'm running
> an old (ie, 1.1something) release.
>
> or could this potentially be causing problems i have yet to notice?
Rik Hemsley wrote:
>
> #if [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > this is wrong.
> > [...]
> > try changing your .xinitrc (the file that _really_ configures X-windows
> > startup) to read something like:
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> >
> > kfm &
> > kpanel &
> > exec kwm
>
> Heh, good try but this isn't right either :)
Hello,
I am trying to mount msdos on linux. I edited the fstab file to mount msdos.
Would anybody please let me know if the "noauto" should be "auto" or
something else? Also should the last set of numbers be 0 0 or 1 1?
Thanks
~Sri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:29:41 -0500, Caitlyn Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I think I need to point out that Adobe is one of the companies
>funding the lobbying in favor of UCITA. I don't often agree with
>RMS, but he is 100% correct when he calls UCITA the greatest threat
>to Free / Open Sour
Nicole Zimmerman wrote:
> > Well, i just used it this morning to generate a PDF file (Portable
> > Document Format) which is read by adobe acrobat reader.
> >
> > Not on linux :/ but sun. (Waiting for ADSL before I attempt that
> > monstrous download)
>
> Unfortunately, there are a lot of thin
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:13:23PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to mount msdos on linux. I edited the fstab file to mount msdos.
> Would anybody please let me know if the "noauto" should be "auto" or
> something else? Also should the last set of numbers be 0 0 or 1 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am trying to mount msdos on linux. I edited the fstab file to mount msdos.
> Would anybody please let me know if the "noauto" should be "auto" or
> something else? Also should the last set of numbers be 0 0 or 1 1?
> Thanks
>
> ~Sri
>
>
>
> Would anybody please let me know if the "noauto" should be "auto" or
> something else?
It should not be noauto (i.e. leave it out) if the media is always there, like
a Windows disk partition, and you want it mounted at boot time. If it's
something like a floppy, "noauto" would be reasonable
Where can we find specifics on this UCITA (or what are some specifics)?
Maybe I'm just a lamer, but I've never heard a word about it. I guess I
don't keep up with the layer-isms (no offense) :o)
... and, I suppose, why is it a "threat" (or a non-threat as the opinion
may be) to the GPL/OSS/free s
Laurel Fan wrote:
> Excerpts from linuxchix: 24-Feb-100 Re: [techtalk] Mandrake 7.0.. by
> Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I am running wu-ftpd-2.6.0-3mdk.i586
>
> Have you set up the ftp user and the ftp account?
> (check by doing:
>
> grep ftp /etc/passwd
>
> ls /home/ftp
>
> ftp://ftp.cert.org/p
"lady crowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mwahahaha... now for the newbie questions...
> what is it used for?
It seems to work really well for longer documents, and I like
the word processing aspect of it more than Emacs, when marking
up text -- it's much closer to WYSIWYG, I guess.
--
stop
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:18:32 -0600, Robert Kiesling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm not sure I agree with the FSF's opinion on UCITA. I thought the
>GPL was just another instance of a shrink-wrap license.
Pretty much. If UCITA passes, the GPL will probably be easier to
enforce because the law
Hi, everyone,
This probably need to migrate to issues, but...
I think I need to point out that Adobe is one of the companies funding the
lobbying in favor of UCITA. I don't often agree with RMS, but he is 100%
correct when he calls UCITA the greatest threat to Free / Open Source
software today.
Caitlyn Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I need to point out that Adobe is one of the companies funding the
> lobbying in favor of UCITA. I don't often agree with RMS, but he is 100%
> correct when he calls UCITA the greatest threat to Free / Open Source
> software today. So... I w
32 matches
Mail list logo
