Hi Christos,
This is Charles Cui from Tsinghua University, China. I am pretty
interested in
the ideas listed in GSOC 2016 page on NetBSD, especially the idea "Get the
open source POSIX test suite working on NetBSD". For my PhD program in
Tsinghua University, I focus on operat
Hi Christos,
Thanks for your reply! Requiring kernel modifications is even
interesting to me.
I also have some experiences in improving kernel mechanisms like spin locks
and scheduling subsystem( in Linux and BSD system). It would be very
existing to see my code is merged into the main source
Thanks Christos for the input, I will follow your advices.
2016-03-02 7:50 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9tzcrg4c4wwbd7fkjjmpjg7cqzwtrrcxudi6ural8y...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hi Christos,
> >
Thanks Christos, I will follow your advices.
2016-03-02 7:50 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9tzcrg4c4wwbd7fkjjmpjg7cqzwtrrcxudi6ural8y...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hi Christos,
> >
> &g
-03-02 13:14 GMT-08:00 Charles Cui :
> Thanks Christos for the input, I will follow your advices.
>
> 2016-03-02 7:50 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> In article <
>> ca+sxe9tzcrg4c4wwbd7fkjjmpjg7cqzwtrrcxudi6ural8y...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Charles Cui wrote:
Hi Christos,
Thanks for sharing the patch and the advise for the project!
I will study your patch carefully and use it to test the system.
Thanks, Christos.
2016-03-06 17:02 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article sozuyu_1rzuu9lyjhmeff2qmwrm9e05d-...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Ch
generate file format problem and
let the tests generate results?
Thanks , Charles.
2016-03-07 10:31 GMT-08:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi Christos,
>
>Thanks for sharing the patch and the advise for the project!
> I will study your patch carefully and use it to test the system.
>
>
&g
Sure, I will focus on easy ones, and will notify you once I have updates.
2016-03-09 12:21 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Mar 9, 11:02am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Google summer code 2016 project ideas
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |it
Hi Christos,
it turns out I forget to issue make clean before making the project.
Now I can see a lot of PASS in the log. But there are still some compiling
errors,
Should we focus on this first?
Thanks, Charles.
2016-03-09 9:57 GMT-08:00 Charles Cui :
> I am using netbsd 6.0, I w
I am using netbsd 6.0, I will looked at the log to see why.
Thanks,Charles
2016-03-09 5:53 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Mar 8, 9:53pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Google summer code 2016 project ideas
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |
building script, but my initial thought is to build
the cross compiler first,
if the cross compiler tool set contains gmake on netbsd, can I just build
posix test suite by replacing the default make(the binary can
then execute on netbsd)?
Thanks, Charles.
2016-03-09 13:21 GMT-08:00 Charles Cui
existing system (like linux) and
tailor to fit netbsd?
Thanks, Charles
2016-03-10 9:48 GMT-08:00 Charles Cui :
> Thanks for your input, I will give up this method.
>
>
> Charles.
>
> 2016-03-09 20:08 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
>>
>> On Mar 9, 7:16pm, charles.cui1...
Got it, thanks.
2016-03-12 21:31 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Mar 12, 8:28pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Google summer code 2016 project ideas
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |My current focus is to classify the errors when building posix
Hi Christos,
I have uploaded my proposal, you guys should be able to see it now.
Please feel free to comment it.
Thanks, Charles
2016-03-14 15:37 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Got it, thanks.
>
> 2016-03-12 21:31 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas :
>> On Mar 12, 8:28pm, charles.cu
here is the link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUd2LRm9vj-NgwLzKGcdOZ9Cd1YGpSmdBF0KLp_8Eek/edit?usp=sharing
2016-03-17 20:48 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi Christos,
>
>I have uploaded my proposal, you guys should be able to see it now.
> Please feel free to comment it.
Hi Christos and NetBSD community,
Thanks for selecting me for GSOC this year. It 's my honor to join NetBSD
community and contribute my code! I will try my best to complete the task.
In terms of work needs to be done in the current stage
(community communications), I think I can start to prep
Thanks Martin for your reply!
2016-04-24 13:13 GMT-07:00 Martin Husemann :
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:00:12PM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:
>> Another thing is my mentor
>> for this project, mentors listed in the website are crispytoast and
>> martin, while I contacted
code, jump to the declaration or
usages because netbsd
has a huge code base. I am looking for a way to work efficiently with
netbsd, your
best practices would be helpful.
Thanks, Charles
2016-04-25 9:39 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Thanks guys, I will follow the link to complete the task as soon as
thanks guys for all your advices! Those are really helpful.
I will try to find a way that works for me best. Will consult and
discuss with you guys when having new problems.
Thanks Charles.
2016-04-28 8:31 GMT-07:00 Joerg Sonnenberger :
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:11:28PM -0700, Charles
ndprotoent'
PerlSock_endprotoent();
^
reentr.h:920:30: warning: implicit declaration of function
'endservent_r' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
# define endservent()
(endservent_r(&PL_reentrant_buffer->_servent_data) == 0 ? 1 : 0)
^
Hi Christos and Martin,
I have set up my environments for development.
I guess the next step is to start to be familiar with the code
base of the POSIX test benchmarks and related kernel subsystems
in NetBSD. I think a lot of problems will be found during this phase.
Does this plan sound good
Hi guys,
I spend some time on researching the project and have some results.
Based on the results, I can split the project into multiple parts and expect
to complete the project in divide-and-concur way.
I found a lot of building errors in the posix benchmark are because of
compiler settings.
ng me know nxr.netbsd.org, I
already used it.
2016-05-06 5:46 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 5, 10:14pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Hi guys,
> |
> |I spend some time on researching the project and have so
R_="${this}" "$@" ${target}; }; _makedirtarget distrib/sets
installsets INSTALLDIR=/ INSTALLSETS=
*** Error code 1
Stop.
nbmake: stopped in /usr/src
ERROR: Failed to make installworld to /
*** BUILD ABORTED ***
2016-05-08 7:24 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 7, 8:5
still not updated! I am wondering which step system header files
are copied to
the system path?
2016-05-08 9:48 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 8, 9:37am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Following is the error when
Some updates.
After installing userland, the header files are updated. I made the mistake in
the last email because of timezone issues, but I am still wondering
why I cannot
install userland after rebooting into the new kernel.
2016-05-08 9:56 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Yes, I build tools loca
ui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Yes, I build tools locally first.
> | Before reading this file, I switched to the old kernel
> | and install userland and kernel simultaneously(no reboot).
> | And the system told me it installed suc
: /usr/obj/tooldir.NetBSD-7.99.29-i386/bin/nbpax: not found
2016-05-08 12:08 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 8, 11:47am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Yes, I followed the instructions.
> | I verified whether a file h
Thanks guys for all your advices! I will try the methods proposed by
you guys and let you know once I have new results.
Right now, my way (install kernel and userland together) works (It
takes kernel and libc updates and generate expected results.) This is
the updated list (much shorter than befor
Sure, I can do it.
To make it clear, besides this list, you want another list that failed
the test because of it is not used in a standard way or compiler
settings?
2016-05-09 7:27 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article
> ,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>>Thanks guys for all your advi
Got it, I can start to collecting it and post you the information once I have.
Thanks, Charles
2016-05-09 10:07 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 9, 10:03am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Sure, I can do it.
&g
that cause this issue?
This is not quite related to my projects, but definitely is good to
let the community know.
*** FINAL System shutdown message from root@ ***
System going down IMMEDIATELY
power button pressed
2016-05-09 11:20 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Got it, I can start to collectin
Oh, yes, this sounds really reasonable to me.
I will try to disable ACPI, thanks!
2016-05-11 7:59 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article
> ,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>>some updates of building kernel.
>>I spend some time these days to investigate the kernel compiling
&
1 10:15 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Oh, yes, this sounds really reasonable to me.
> I will try to disable ACPI, thanks!
>
>
> 2016-05-11 7:59 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> > In article do49+oh_qc7dx4o+uewd...@mail.gmail.com>,
> > Charles Cui wrote:
> >>some u
tp://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/sys/sys/signal.h#151>#*endif* /*
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED || XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500 || _NETBSD_SOURCE */
2016-05-12 9:57 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 12, 9:22am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC proje
700, Charles Cui wrote:
> > Hi Christos,
> >
> >I got the new list post below. Note that the second list is build with
> > -D_NETBSD_SOURCE -lpthread -lrt -lm
>
> If you have a proper NetBSD build environment (native or cross compilation)
> then -D_NETBSD_SOURCE
flag is not necessary for us, then problem is solved.
2016-05-13 6:43 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 12, 9:50pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Well, your saying of _NETBSD_SOURCE is defined by default see
Hi Guys,
I have attached a patch which is used to expose SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX to
user land. This will remove a lot of errors related with those macros in
posix test benchmark (http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/). Comments are
welcomed. Besides this mail list, I believe it would be useful to al
E defined to compile.
>
> christos
>
> On May 14, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Charles Cui
> wrote:
>
> let's call this small program as test.c.
>
> There is no problem when executing the command gcc test.c,
>
> However, when executing as gcc test.c -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2
16, at 00:20, Martin Husemann wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:48:23PM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I have attached a patch which is used to expose SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
> to
> >> user land. This will remove a lot of e
Hi guys,
I spent some time on pthread libraries in netbsd which is a big part in
my project, and have some questions to ask.
Taking pthread_barrierattr_getpshared, pthread_barrierattr_setpshared
as an example. These functions are used to getting and setting barrierattr
data structure. netbsd
Thanks Martin and Soda!
How about other functions? Does it make sense to follow POSIX standard
to implement the missing functions in netbsd?
2016-05-18 19:00 GMT-07:00 SODA Noriyuki :
> > On Thu, 19 May 2016 01:13:09 +0200,
> Martin Husemann said:
>
> > int pthread_barrierattr_setpshar
Thanks Christos, Martin and SODA for these advices and documents!
I will start to get familiar with freebsd designs and try to contribute as
much
as possible to netbsd community.
2016-05-19 10:36 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 18, 3:40pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wr
turns _POSIX_TIMER_MAX in
sysconf system call, where can I find the logic to enforce this number when
user land allocates more times than this value?
Let me know if there are any concerns.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-05-26 7:30 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 19, 5:03pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com
l send you guys the patch of the porting work shortly.
2016-05-26 15:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 26, 2:08pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: pthread library related
>
> 1. SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX should not be exposed (the kernel does not support
Please see my comments inline.
2016-05-26 14:35 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 26, 2:08pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: pthread library related
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |I am studying the pthread libraries in netbsd, and have
Thanks for these information!
I will implement these missing features asap.
2016-05-29 6:46 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 28, 11:28pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: timers related
>
> | HI guys,
> |
> | I have 3 timers related macro
logic for _SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX.
I have tested 3 of these patches using posix benchmark suite, and they
worked.
I will add formal unit tests and man pages later.
Please provide comments if you have.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-05-26 15:27 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Yes, I can do 2 and 5, and fix 3.
>
Hi Kamil,
_SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX is not the same with SEM_VALUE_MAX.
The first one is used to limit the number of sems for a process, while
the second is used to set the initial value for a semaphore.
2016-05-26 16:25 GMT-07:00 Kamil Rytarowski :
>
>
> On 27.05.2016 00:02, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
No, using atomic_inc / atomic_dec for p_nsem is wrong!
Let's think about the multithreading case. Let's use 2 threads A and B in
the same process as an example. Assume p_nsem is not reaching the limit,
but only one slot is left.
A and B will each read the p_nsem separately. There will be probabi
overhead.
2016-05-30 13:30 GMT-07:00 Martin Husemann :
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:25:34PM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:
> > there is one remaining slot. And each of them will increase p_nsem by one
> > using atomic_inc, the results are we have 1 slot overused, but the error
> is
good to know atomic_inc_uint_nv is implemented using cas.
I will update the patch and send you guys later (being careful about the
format)
Thanks Charles
2016-05-30 13:46 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 30, 1:43pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: p
Hi guys,
I have attached patches based on comments from Christos.
The new patch used atomic_inc_uint_nv to limit the number of
sems used by each process. I have tested these patches.
They worked.
2016-05-30 14:19 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> good to know atomic_inc_uint_nv is implemented us
If there are no comments for these two patches.
I will move forward for other parts.
Sounds good?
2016-06-01 19:28 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi guys,
>
>I have attached patches based on comments from Christos.
> The new patch used atomic_inc_uint_nv to limit the number of
&g
HI guys,
I have 3 timers related macro to be added, which are _SC_CPUTIME,
_SC_THREAD_CPUTIME and _SC_DELAYTIMER_MAX.
the first and second are set to be 200112L in freebsd. I am wondering
what's the meaning of those macros? and what are the cases to use these
macros? I am thinking of where to
Yes, sure. I will finish it as soon as possible.
And will let you know if I encounter new problems.
Thanks, Charles
2016-06-03 16:59 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 3, 4:37pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Thanks Zafer
GMT-07:00 Zafer Aydoğan :
> You can find the FreeBSD sources at:
>
> http://src.illumos.org/source/
> or
> https://grok.dragonflybsd.org/
> or
> http://bxr.su/
>
> 2016-05-30 4:28 GMT+02:00 Charles Cui :
> > Thanks for these information!
> > I wil
Sure, I will keep an eye on them.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-05 10:18 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 5, 9:53am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |I have completed the man pages for bsd_signal,
17:05 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 3, 5:01pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Yes, sure. I will finish it as soon as possible.
> | And will let you know if I encounter new problems.
>
> Yes, and for all the other p
Thanks!
2016-06-05 14:00 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 5, 1:14pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |One quick question about this commit.
> |
> https://github.com/IIJ-
Hi Christos,
One quick question about this commit.
https://github.com/IIJ-NetBSD/netbsd-src/commit/ef38d5736b7367bff9aba260f532e5b24728b224
why do we need this line twice?
+./usr/share/man/cat3/bsd_signal.0 comp-c-catman .cat
2016-06-05 12:21 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Sure, I will keep
Cool! that's a really good idea, I will see whether SIGIO can replace
SIGPOLL totally.
Thanks for the advice!
Charles.
2016-06-07 19:44 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 7, 7:33pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: PTHREAD_STACK_MIN support
>
&
Hi Christos,
I have PTHREAD_STACK_MIN supported and attached
patch for your review. My next step is to focus on the remaining
part of signal (SIGPOLL, _SC_REALTIME_SIGNALS and _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX).
Seems we need much more significant changes in this part.
Thanks, Charles
0003-add-PTHREAD_STAC
Hi guys,
I am trying to add the support of SIGQUEUE_MAX, which is the maximal
number of real time signals to the target process. There are several ways
to
send a signal to a process like, kill, raise, etc. I am wondering whether
all real
time signals should be only sent via sigqueue? (in which
Please see my comments inline.
2016-06-10 16:29 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 10, 2:37pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks, Christos, I will read FreeBSD related code carefully.
>
> In the meantime also:
>
.
After adding the unit tests, I will continue the work of real time signals.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-10 16:29 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 10, 2:37pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks, Christos, I will read Fre
2016-06-14 14:14 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 14, 1:29pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | 1. add unit tests for ad's work to make sure it works well.
> | 2. may add some changes according to your comments
I got it. Thanks Christos.
2016-06-14 15:43 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 14, 2:25pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | One thing I guess you can commit is pthread_condattr_getclock and it's
> | man pages.
>
Hi Christos,
Please find my comments below.
2016-06-14 9:50 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9s4by1klxgxuwwgdv+0_z-balpbg2woeg18tfyg1yw...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >
> >Let me know if there are problems. In the next several days
Thanks, I will complete my test cases as soon as possible.
2016-06-14 16:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 14, 3:50pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | I got it. Thanks Christos.
>
> And here it is:
>
> http://
Yeah, that makes sense. I will see how to construct such a unit test(or
call it benchmark)
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-17 10:44 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 16, 9:28pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
arles Cui :
> Thanks, I will complete my test cases as soon as possible.
>
> 2016-06-14 16:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> On Jun 14, 3:50pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>>
>> | I got it. Thanks C
com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | I have write a draft of the benchmark, but have not verified successfully
> | on the patched system.
> | The idea is to
> | 1. create a mutexattr data structure and set pthread priority protect
> | protocol.
:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 17, 10:45am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Yeah, that makes sense. I will see how to construct such a unit test(or
> | call it benchmark)
>
> How's that coming along? Also can you plea
provide the test?
Thanks Charles.
2016-06-22 14:53 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 22, 1:23pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Any comments on the tests?
>
> Yes, I am not finished yet testing and looking. Here are some
Any comments on the tests?
2016-06-21 14:36 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi Christos,
>
> Some updates on the tests of priority protect.
> You need to apply my new patch here,
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/PRIOPROTECT_AND_GETCLOCK/0005-extend-sc
1:23pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Any comments on the tests?
>
> Yes, I am not finished yet testing and looking. Here are some preliminary
> ones:
>
> 1. You've added more fields to sched_params. This should no
Hi Christos,
This test generates a deadlock. t1 holds resource m1 and waits for m2,
t2 holds resource m2 and waits for m1.
Is this the result that you want to generate?
2016-06-24 6:05 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article 7dw...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cu
Yeah, I will try to construct a new test.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-22 15:28 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 22, 3:11pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks Christos for these comments!
> | In terms of the new fi
/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/PRIOPROTECT_AND_GETCLOCK/0007-unit-test-for-scheduling-proof-of-priority-ceiling.patch
Thanks, Charles
2016-06-27 12:45 GMT+08:00 Charles Cui :
> I will think about how to do it.
>
>
> Thanks Charles
>
> 2016-06-25 6:32 GMT-07:00 Christos Zo
ink that
> realtime signal support is a bit too much for GSoC, what part of mmap are
> you suggesting to do?
>
> thanks!
>
> christos
>
> On Jul 3, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Charles Cui wrote:
>
> thanks! What's the next part do you want me to focus? signal, mmap,
> S
Well, in this case, what I suggest is that I try both things at the same
time and
see which part is more easily for me to make a breakthrough. Sounds good?
I will let you guys know my progress.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-04 23:24 GMT+08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 4, 4:34pm, mar...@duskware.de
man pages for sched_protect
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/commit/50450adf1a890965440d6e1bf9c6f113a247867e
Thanks Charles
2016-07-05 7:30 GMT+08:00 Charles Cui :
> Well, in this case, what I suggest is that I try both things at the same
> time and
> see which part is mo
Thanks for your feedbacks, I will try to fix these problems as soon as
possible.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-14 8:20 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 14, 5:09pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |actual
real time signal number, the earlier to be consumed.)
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-15 21:15 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Thanks for your feedbacks, I will try to fix these problems as soon as
> possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Charles.
>
> 2016-07-14 8:20 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 17, 2:02am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> | I considered the questions that you asked.
> |
Hi guys,
I spent some time investigating the sigqueue code path, which is used by
realtime signals,
but I am confused about some logics,
please provide comments if you have specific knowledge about this part.
I followed the call chain path of sigqueue, and pretty confident about how
a signal is
Please see my comments below.
2016-07-20 7:47 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article jbuco6x1ct4+7fjwq...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
> >
> >2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-
Thanks Robert for your understanding.
In conclusion, you think the signals are consumed
at the time of context switch. I will keep this information
in mind and see how all functions are connected.
Thanks Charles
2016-07-20 9:15 GMT-07:00 Robert Elz :
> Date:Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:28:13
2016-07-21 10:16 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9uj7lg40xyt0g1v-cznxwkrnk79t0xcd4d2-qdlrma...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>
> >I did not quite understand it.
> >
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/R
Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 21, 10:33am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Got it, I will fix it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> | OK, I can write a program as you designed. Right now I have netbsd and
> | Linux environments, and
> | can verify t
-07-17 7:11 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
>
> 2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> On Jul 17, 2:02am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>>
>> | Hi Ch
2016-07-23 3:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9u+2snfnc7yov3c_b52dtcbek-9ie25+kwzosh7fnz...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hi Christos,
> >Here is a improved patch based on your code review,
> >
>
.
Let me know if there are any problems.
2016-07-23 12:15 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
>
> 2016-07-23 3:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> In article <
>> ca+sxe9u+2snfnc7yov3c_b52dtcbek-9ie25+kwzosh7fnz...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Charles Cui wrote:
>> >-=-=-
I have attached the new version.
But it seems both Linux and and netbsd will process signal with large signo
number first.
2016-07-23 23:44 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 23, 8:03pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
&
Sure, I can implement the sigorder function and will get back to you soon.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-24 20:52 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 24, 3:00pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | I have attached the new version.
> | Bu
25, 8:13pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | I have attached the test_signal v2 version, which fills the signal
> | reorder function. After we fix the bug that you found,
> | we can use this program to test.
>
> Great; I think that
I have attached the test_signal v2 version, which fills the signal
reorder function. After we fix the bug that you found,
we can use this program to test.
2016-07-25 16:03 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> I have see how to debug this. Hopefully my understanding for signal
> delivery is enou
Hi Christos,
This patch fixed the bug you found
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0006-bug-fix-for-real-time-signals.patch
2016-07-25 21:33 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> yeah, it seems correct,
> my solution use another array, so space complicity
-27 3:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 26, 8:15pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> | This patch fixed the bug you found
> |
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
