Any comments on the tests? 2016-06-21 14:36 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui <charles.cui1...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Christos, > > Some updates on the tests of priority protect. > You need to apply my new patch here, > https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/PRIOPROTECT_AND_GETCLOCK/0005-extend-sched_param.patch > > and run the test, > > https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/PRIOPROTECT_AND_GETCLOCK/0006-unit-tests-for-priority-protect.patch > You can see thread who is blocked on mutex has higher protect priority, > which is considered by kernel when scheduling. > > Thanks, Charles > > 2016-06-20 18:58 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com>: > >> On Jun 20, 1:07pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote: >> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX >> >> | I have write a draft of the benchmark, but have not verified >> successfully >> | on the patched system. >> | The idea is to >> | 1. create a mutexattr data structure and set pthread priority protect >> | protocol. >> | 2. set the real time scheduling policy. >> | 3. use the mutexattr to init a mutex. >> | 4. create 2 threads to contend for the mutex >> | 5. verify that the thread who is waiting for the mutex is executed on a >> | higher priority(ceiling priority of mutex) >> | I will notify you the new results once I have made progress. >> | >> | I will send you the summary and plan in a separate email later. >> >> Sounds like a good plan, thanks! >> >> christos >> > >
