Got it, thanks.
2016-03-12 21:31 GMT-08:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com>: > On Mar 12, 8:28pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: Google summer code 2016 project ideas > > | Hi Christos, > | > | My current focus is to classify the errors when building posix test > | suite on netbsd. > | Basically, there is > | 1. easy to fix error, likes formatting, lack of necessary headers, etc. > | 2. errors that can convert to netbsd implementation. Some systems (ex linux) > | actually define the same function name with netbsd, but they may have > | different parameters. > | 3. netbsd miss the implementation of some features. > | > | Problem 1 and 2 can be solved by some kind of converting and minor fixes. > | For problem 3, which needs the implementation in kernel, or libraries, > | can we use the implementation of existing system (like linux) and > | tailor to fit netbsd? > > That sounds like a good classification and in your plan you should > allocate some time (first perhaps) to cleanup 1 and 2. For 3 you > are better off looking at FreeBSD instead because the code is a lot > more similar. > > Best, > > christos
