Yeah, I will try to construct a new test.
Thanks, Charles. 2016-06-22 15:28 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com>: > On Jun 22, 3:11pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX > > | Thanks Christos for these comments! > | In terms of the new fields exposed by sched_param, those are only for > | testing convenience, if we decide to expose those to users, we need to > | consider carefully. > > Does not matter, if we expose them or not. If the structure size changes, > it breaks the ABI... We just need to decide what to do. I don't think it > is that useful to expose them... Anyway if we change it we should decide > if we want to include the sporadic scheduler stuff so we don't have to > keep burning syscalls (or version the structure). > > | In terms of the testing method proposed by you, did you already implement > | and test > | or want me to provide the test? > > Why don't you give it a try... > > Thanks, > > christos >
