Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2014-05-16 at 06:35 -0700, Shrdlu wrote: > Ignore it. I run two mailing lists, and neither has been affected by > this, no matter how much Sturm und Drang is out and about concerning > the change. Yes, both lists have Yahoo members. Yes, I've warned them > that if Yahoo starts bouncing messages,

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Tracy Di Marco White
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Steve VanDevender < ste...@hexadecimal.uoregon.edu> wrote: > David Lang writes: > > remember SPF records and how they were supposed to completely > > eliminate spam? and how they had similar problems with mailing lists > > and have now faded a bit, only to be r

Re: [lopsa-tech] Looking for good comparison of SAS Drives

2014-05-16 Thread john boris
Thanks for the quick replies. Some more info. I am backing up 22 SCO boxes that have 9gb total space each. I also have 6+ LINUX servers with 75gb drives. The SCO Master backups are not 9GB total but more like 4GB since the system was originally built to run on a 1GB drive. I have to stay with the

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread David Lang
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Matthew Barr wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: Have you looked into who's behind creating DMARC? AOL, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, Comcast, and others. Something to consider is that it was *also* created by Paypal & banks, which are f

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
David Lang wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014, Shrdlu wrote: On 5/16/2014 6:13 AM, David Bronder wrote: On 05/16/2014 08:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm] Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are doing is correct and that

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread David Lang
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Shrdlu wrote: On 5/16/2014 6:13 AM, David Bronder wrote: On 05/16/2014 08:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm] Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are doing is correct and that the only way to do

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Matthew Barr
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: > Have you looked into who's behind creating DMARC? AOL, Google, > Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, Comcast, and others. Something to consider is that it was *also* created by Paypal & banks, which are frequently spoofed/phished. Not to mentio

Re: [lopsa-tech] Looking for good comparison of SAS Drives

2014-05-16 Thread Doug Hughes
If you have a 24x7 work cycle, avoid the green drives. They won't last. Red drives are reasonable and there are a lot of articles out there on the web about people using the red drives in production for 24x7. They generally have a 3 year warranty. If you expect to be doing active caching or other h

Re: [lopsa-tech] Looking for good comparison of SAS Drives

2014-05-16 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:23:13PM -0400, john boris wrote: > I have to rebuild my remote Backup Server (A place for my servers to backup > to hard dirves). I currently have a LINUX system with a RAID 5 array of > 300GB SAS drives (Total 1.5TB) which has to be increased to 4TB or larger > (sorta de

Re: [lopsa-tech] Looking for good comparison of SAS Drives

2014-05-16 Thread John Stoffel
john> I have to rebuild my remote Backup Server (A place for my john> servers to backup to hard dirves). I currently have a LINUX john> system with a RAID 5 array of 300GB SAS drives (Total 1.5TB) john> which has to be increased to 4TB or larger (sorta depends on the john> cost) We are virtualizin

[lopsa-tech] Looking for good comparison of SAS Drives

2014-05-16 Thread john boris
I have to rebuild my remote Backup Server (A place for my servers to backup to hard dirves). I currently have a LINUX system with a RAID 5 array of 300GB SAS drives (Total 1.5TB) which has to be increased to 4TB or larger (sorta depends on the cost) We are virtualizing 22 of my servers which curren

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Steve VanDevender
David Lang writes: > On Fri, 16 May 2014, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: > > Have you looked into who's behind creating DMARC? AOL, Google, > > Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, Comcast, and others. > > This isn't the first anti-spam creation those companies have created. > > Just because it

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread David Lang
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm] Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are doing is correct and that the only way to do anything going forward is to munge things to work with Yahoo As I said in OP, an

Re: [lopsa-tech] Project management application for individuals?

2014-05-16 Thread Charles Polisher
Mathew Snyder wrote: > Looks like Trello has some fans. I'll give that a go in addition to the few > others mentioned as well as another I found: http://www.tinypm.com. > > Dhanasekaran Anbalagan > wrote: > > you can consider blossom. > > https://www.blossom.io/ > > > > Will Dennis wrote: > > > >>

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Shrdlu
On 5/16/2014 6:13 AM, David Bronder wrote: On 05/16/2014 08:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm] Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are doing is correct and that the only way to do anything going forward is to munge t

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread David Bronder
On 05/16/2014 08:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: >> From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm] >> >> Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are >> doing >> is correct and that the only way to do anything going forward is to munge >> things >> to work with Yahoo

Re: [lopsa-tech] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-16 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (lopser)
> From: David Lang [mailto:da...@lang.hm] > > Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are > doing > is correct and that the only way to do anything going forward is to munge > things > to work with Yahoo As I said in OP, and in fact, you quoted in your reply: Before