yes, exactly, that's what I do.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Faiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:09 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Best practice? Cleaning up instance data in pages and
> compone nts for the cache?
>
>
> Ah yes, that's for data re
If you only need to have transaction opened during page rendering then
you should put your logic into separate hivemind service with threaded
model.
Such service must start transaction at initialization and close it in
the end of thread
( after page rendering ). Look more in hivemind docs.
---
What you use?
windows xp
windows 2000
windows 98
windows 95
or other
---
Best regards
m2f
Sent from www.TapestryForums.com
Read this topic online here: <>
http://www.tapestryforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=14694#14694
m2f
Ah yes, that's for data represented by an abstract getter and setter,
right?
I'm discovering that there's a hybrid solution to this - rely on
those abstract proxies whenever possible, dont use class members,
store state in an ASO. :)
Cheers,
Nick
On 11/04/2006, at 3:52 PM, Schulte Marcus
afaik all properties are reset to their initial value (defaults to null)
when the page is returned to the pool ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Faiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:43 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Best practice? Cleaning up instance da
Hi,
Is there an easyt practice for ensuring that instance data in pages
and components is cleaned up, before the object is cached for future
needs?
My current idea is to implement the detach() method in each page and
have the components implement PageDetachListener.
Is there a more conv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote:
> I would rather keep the XML files around to *override* the annotations,
> not because I can't use Java 5.0.
Amen! [with a caveat that it should be _easy_ (whatever 'easy' is) to
override] We'll have to see how this pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip S. Adamsen wrote:
> Oops, source-tree should of been class-tree.
>
> It's 3:47 AM and I'm out of coffee... : P
Was Java appropriately named, or what? Always a reference to coffee in
developer threads. ;-)
>
> Filip S. Adamsen skrev:
>> I just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Snare wrote:
> I hope not. That would be horrible. There's a good segment of us
> still using java 1.4 who would be significantly annoyed at that, and
> for good reason.
Yes, and some of that "us" you reference includes me. :-)
>
> I know that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I did build the docs - and yes I'm still waiting on commit access.
But for those who want to know 'off-site', here's the snippet of the
changelog that's going to be in the site (wish I could format it better,
but...) :
# fix Fixed TemplateParser
Hello,
I am currently evaluating Tapestry 4 and am having issues with the select drop
downs. Is there an option to allow the selected option to be set to an
object's property directly ?? From what I can see, it seems to be set to a
boolean array. I have also tried the Property Selection compo
I would rather keep the XML files around to *override* the annotations,
not because I can't use Java 5.0.
As for the use of JDK 5.0, well... this is a release that's a ... year
from now? And we'll have to maintain backwards compatibility with Java
1.1 or 1.2 or whatever at a time when - I thin
The two cents:
I think annotations are great and convenient, this is not intended as any kind
of annotations flame war. I think XML is easier for tool support, amongst
other things. We are going to have more annotations support in the future with
the Cognition Modeler, but otherwise XML provid
Are you extending a page class (shot in the dark)?
> On 10. Apr 2006 - 11:45:52, Mark wrote:
> | What happens if you take the @Persist annotation out?
> | Just to see if the error goes away. Maybe that would be a pointer
> then...
>
> The exception remains exactly as it was before...
>
> -
Oops, source-tree should of been class-tree.
It's 3:47 AM and I'm out of coffee... : P
Filip S. Adamsen skrev:
I just moved some of my application's assets into my source-tree.
Unfortunately, it appears that externalized assets aren't working
properly, at least as far as I can see.
-
What version is this against?
On 4/10/06, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just moved some of my application's assets into my source-tree.
> Unfortunately, it appears that externalized assets aren't working
> properly, at least as far as I can see.
>
> This is the URL I get when I
I hope everyone understands that T5 is still a long ways away from coming
out. The T4.1 series has barely started to form a new API, let alone even an
alpha release.
There will be many many iterative releases of the 4.1 series while all of
that new functionality is figured out, and the old functio
I just moved some of my application's assets into my source-tree.
Unfortunately, it appears that externalized assets aren't working
properly, at least as far as I can see.
This is the URL I get when I include some.file in my component (the two
files are in the same directory in the source tree
ok ok I guess I'd better have my say.
I'm going to build *something* for T4, if for no other reason that I
have made many promises in the past and I'm not one to renege.
I'm afraid that that *something* will be less than what people are
hoping for. The devil is in the details and I *am* crushed a
Sounds like a bug to me..
What happens if you add this to the bottom of your html page?
dojo.require("dojo.widget");
On 4/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Been trying for some time know to get an AjaxForm working.
> All my tests end up with something like...
>
> D
There was a general vote on abandoning support for JDK < 1.5 when the
ideas for T5 were originally floated.. but I'm not sure that ditching
the xml was included in that discussion.
I'm ok with losing the xml because I have already put in a suggestion
not to lose the xml! :-)
I was thinking we "lo
Please keep the XML configs around as optional. I really really dislike
long annotations. And I do like existing XML configs. With Eclipse/IDEA
XML auto-fill, they totally do not get in the way.
Please keep them around...
-Alex
Bryan Lewis wrote:
Same feelings here. I *like* the xml bindi
Same feelings here. I *like* the xml binding files and I'm not wild
about mixing too many presentation details in with my java code.
(Although I suspect there would be some benefits like compiler type
checking.)
Mike Snare wrote:
>I hope not. That would be horrible. There's a good segment of
I'm not sure how old this PDF is (the cover page says "sponsored by JSS
SYmposium March 2006") , but it looks like Howard himself said this...
Count me +1 against that idea...
Here is the summary:
---quote---
Tapestry 5 will be significantly advanced over Tapestry 4 or anything
else; planned f
As I understand, the rewind cycle updates properties and if there is
an active transaction these changes could be persisted without my
knowing? or am I wrong?
What I want is to make the transaction only span the part of the
rendering that has to do with reading, so that no properties will be
persi
I hope not. That would be horrible. There's a good segment of us
still using java 1.4 who would be significantly annoyed at that, and
for good reason.
I know that the tap developers don't tend to concern themselves with
backward compatibility, but it seems you should try to *build* a user
base -
Hi all,
Been trying for some time know to get an AjaxForm working.
All my tests end up with something like...
DEBUG: AjaxForm submission using form submit.
DEBUG: ERROR: On line 483 of document
http://localhost/testapp/app?digest=b28ed13c10dc1486db25d6aa85688eec&path=%2Fnet%2Fsf%2Ftacos%2Fajax%2F
Like Mark says - it may make sense for Spindle to actually do that... I
wouldn't neccesarilly call it a "fear". It would probably be for the
benefit of having a much earlier T5 Spindle.
If Geoff is pressed for time anyway, it may make more sense to start
getting a T5 spindle out the door, rath
And to make things worse... has Geoff has stated he is still using T3 at
work, so his efforts are on that direction... one has to pay the bills.
Really hope that Marks fears don't come true and that Spindle doesn't skip
T4!
Come on Geoff we're all holding our breaths out here! Keep it up! ;-)
On
Use Tapestry's Creator class (in org.apache.tapestry.test)
to instanciate pages and components to be tested.
Creator allows passing mock instances of a component's
properties.
>From Rob Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a listener like this:
>
> @InjectService(�FooService�)
> public abstra
I have a listener like this:
@InjectService(“FooService”)
public abstract FooService getFooService();
public void doSomething()
{
FooService fs = getFooService();
fs.doBar();
}
Can I inject a mock FooService into the component for testing purposes without
having to change hivemo
I just read on
http://www.virtuas.com/files/JavaWebFrameworkSweetSpots.pdf that T5 will
not have any XML configuration option any more, only annotations.
Is this true?
MARK
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Yeah I think Brian built the docs already, but I figured I'd let him do the
honors since he should theoretically have commit access any day now.
On 4/10/06, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any luck on getting a 3.0.4 change log?
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> On 4/4/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTEC
Any luck on getting a 3.0.4 change log?
Thanks,
Ryan
On 4/4/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm currently working on getting the 3.0.4 site built which will have
> the changelog. I'll post again as soon as I have something that
I'm not very familiar with Spring MVC but most Spring Web tools seem to
provide rather low level tools for other frameworks instead of Tapestry
which is a complete component based solution. I don't believe it is possible
to make a comparison between, but I would suggest you to have a look at both
t
Hi guys,
does anybody know of a detailed comparison of Tapestry 4 vs. Spring MVC?
I only found some short comparisons that were all related to T3,
claiming T3 was very difficult to impossible to unit test - which others
say is not true...
Then I found this:
http://www.virtuas.com/files/JavaW
Ooops That was a very nasty typo. Appologies to the forum. Here
comes the correct text of my post:
Anybody knows how to pass in a regExp containing [ and ] into Tapestry's
pattern validator? I haven't found it out and created my own validator
that accepts (for example) {a-zA-Z} and transfo
Anybody knows how to pass in a regExp containing [ and ] into Tapestry's
pattern validator? I haven't found it out and created my own validator
that accepts (for example) {a-zA-Z} and transforms that internally to
[a-zA-Z].
Is there a way to do something like shit: value="validators=pattern=[
With my solution, the request would span the rewinding + page rendering...
Why don't you want the transaction to span the rewinding?
I'll post on the wiki my solution.
Henri.
On 4/10/06, Ted Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Henri.
>
> I got a solution that provides the session (in a sessi
Geoff is working on it when he has available cycles. And as we all know free
time is hard to come by. Currently, he is on some kind of death march at his
paying job so it will be a bit before he can get back to Spindle.
He has stated on the Spindle Development list that supporting 4.x is very
Hi Henri.
I got a solution that provides the session (in a session-per-view
manner). I also have transaction-handling (using interceptors).
Problem now is that there must be a transaction open while rendering
the page, for being able to lazy-load collections, etc.
I do not want the transaction to
I wouldn't suggest to hack into the page rendering... This lead into most of
my poor code in Tapestry 3 that I'm trying to cleanup...
What I did in Tapestry 4 is a WebRequestFilter that creates a Spring
Hibernate session (I translated the Spring "OpenSessionInView" servlet
filter). If you are using
Can't remember where I found this..
public abstract class MyExternalPage extends BasePage implements IExternalPage {
public void activateExternalPage(Object[] params, IRequestCycle cycle) {
Object param1 = cycle.getRequestContext().getParameter("param1"));
doOtherStuff(cycle);
On 10. Apr 2006 - 11:45:52, Mark wrote:
| What happens if you take the @Persist annotation out?
| Just to see if the error goes away. Maybe that would be a pointer then...
The exception remains exactly as it was before...
-
To un
Hi all!
I need an active transaction when the page is rendered, in order to
load/read lazy collections.
One way to do it would be to start a transaction in beginRender etc.
Another way that I think is better would be to intercept the method in
the Engine that renders the page.
Now the problem is t
The best way to ensure it gets in the head is probably to use the delegate
parameter of the Shell component. It's something I didn't discover until
recently, but is very powerful in terms of defining dynamic extension
points.
On 4/10/06, Chris Chiappone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying t
My bulletinboard module is composed of pages instead of components ...
Is there any way to make a "library" with pages ?
Sam Gendler wrote:
I don't have a definitive answer for you. However, the JSCookMenu
component (available from tassel) allows you to supply new themse and
assets without mod
There would certainly need to be some filtering.
As to the issue of objects in pages, it's really a matter of logic in
pages, since the objects aren't really stored in the pages anyway.
Shouldn't be an issue.
There are many issues that would need to be addressed, but it should be do-able.
On 4/
What happens if you take the @Persist annotation out?
Just to see if the error goes away. Maybe that would be a pointer then...
MARK
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Mark,
thanks for the pointer, I will look at it in detail later on.
My main problem is that I am sure most thing can be done, but there is
no documentation out there about how to do it. Especially for T4, I have
not found anything that explains how the infrastructure works internally.
So I
I am trying to add the following javascript in the head of my Border page as
follows:
djConfig = { isDebug: false,
baseRelativePath: "js/dojo",
preventBackButtonFix: false,
parseWidgets: false
};
The problem that i'm having is that the
Mike,
Not sure if it would have to be done in a way that you can specify which
pages to inject stuff into. Maybe based on the Page interface-/
implementation classname.
Otherwise you end up with all kinds of objects in page classes that do
not want them. Although, I am not sure if this would b
Hi,
One option I see is for you to use a parameter to call the bulletin board.
E.g, in each other tapestry application you could make an external link to
the bulletin board and pass header and footer as parameters (and eventually
encode them so users don't see them). Then you could have that heade
For future reference: Solved my problem by simply contributing my
enhancement worker with before="tapestry.enhance.inject-specification"
instead of before="tapestry.enhance.abstract-property"!
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Mark Lehmacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: tapestry-user@jakart
Not ideal, for sure. I think part B of my proposal is much better --
an application.page file that has normal page-file semantics to
inject/add whatever is needed across all pages:
application.page file:
Then any page that wanted the FooService could just do:
public abstract MyPage exten
Basically you should be able to do all the stuff you can do with annotations
programmatically using EnhancementWorkers. You should have a look at the
org.apache.tapestry.enhance package and the implementation of the
annotations (which use enhancement workers).
I am stuck with JDK1.4 myself and had
I don't have a definitive answer for you. However, the JSCookMenu
component (available from tassel) allows you to supply new themse and
assets without modifying the original component. If you look at the
code to JSCookMenu, you may well see something that will help you
solve this. Alternatively,
> @Tap Team:
> How difficult would it be to add the ability to either:
> A) declare services/aso's as 'global' (or some better label), such
> that every page gets it injected?
But bear in mind that anything that would be injected 'blind' by the
framework would not be visible within the public i
Again, I would suggest that if you feel it's important to know that
the mail was actually sent then the user likely will too. Return a
flag or object from the service and use it to conditionally render
text to the response. Test for that.
-Mike
On 4/10/06, Dan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Yeah, this is way we write our pages. The pages are very lightweight and
normally just call services. The services are separately unit tested.
The problem is being able to test if the page actually calls the
service.
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 11:30 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> That's kind of the idea
On 10. Apr 2006 - 11:37:09, Mike Snare wrote:
| Hmm.. Maybe a problem with the doctor class? Is it possible that the
| doctor class doesn't really compile?
No, I'm using it all over the place. If the class didn't compile
actually the whole application wouldn't be usable at all ;)
| What about A
Hmm.. Maybe a problem with the doctor class? Is it possible that the
doctor class doesn't really compile?
What about ActivatePage? Does it have any reference to a doctor
property that could (grabbing at straws here) cause some sort of
collision?
-Mike
On 4/10/06, Andreas Bulling <[EMAIL PROTEC
You can't possibly write a test to ensure that every single line of
every single method gets called without writing log statements and
parsing the log.
Test your page, test your service. You can return some flag from the
service method (perhaps a boolean) to indicate whether or not the
service wa
On 10. Apr 2006 - 11:23:48, James Carman wrote:
| That's what I typically do. I've seen that error message before, but it
| usually meant that something else was wrong. Are there any warning/error
| messages above that anywhere? I can't remember exactly what the problem
| was, but it wasn't intu
That's kind of the idea behind T4 and the HiveMind integration. Pages
should just collect information from the user and pass that information to
services to actually do the work (and then present results back to the user
of course). That way, your pages are more lightweight and view-oriented
only
On 10. Apr 2006 - 11:22:24, Mike Snare wrote:
| You showed that for the EditPatient page, but not in the ShowPatient
| page where the exception is occurring. Does some part (probably in
| ShowPatient.page) of the page attempt to access a 'doctor' property?
| If so, prove to yourself that getDocto
So, make your page call a service which does all the work. Then, you can
easily test a service object outside the container using mock objects.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11:26 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: RE: [OT] test c
I would love to use a mock object for this, but I'm not sure of a way to
instantiate a page class in order to test it. We use mock objects
extensively elsewhere but I don't know how to set up a tapestry page to
test it.
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 11:19 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> I would use MockObjec
But that's not the point. If you are using Test Driven Development, how
do you write a test to make sure that line 2 even exists?
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 11:19 -0400, Mike Snare wrote:
> If the message gets displayed, and you know it's because the code
> 'displayMessage()' on line N displayed it, it
That's what I typically do. I've seen that error message before, but it
usually meant that something else was wrong. Are there any warning/error
messages above that anywhere? I can't remember exactly what the problem
was, but it wasn't intuitive to me at the time either if I remember
correctly.
Sorry, I can't find anything wrong - but I'm just getting started with
Tapestry myself...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You showed that for the EditPatient page, but not in the ShowPatient
page where the exception is occurring. Does some part (probably in
ShowPatient.page) of the page attempt to access a 'doctor' property?
If so, prove to yourself that getDoctor should exist in either
ShowPatient or the enhanced s
Yeah, generally, I looked through the API and it looks like many, many
objects and methods that give access to internal things are deprecated.
The documentation says "Use injection instead", but I am using Java 1.4.
And one important thing to consider: annotations will be coded into the
class fi
I would use MockObjects for this and the second line would be something
like:
emailService.sendEmail( params );
Then, you give it a mock emailService and make sure it calls it.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11:16 AM
To: Tapestr
If the message gets displayed, and you know it's because the code
'displayMessage()' on line N displayed it, it's probably a safe bet
that the code on line N+1 executed...
-Mike
On 4/10/06, Dan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No no. Okay lets say I have some code in the page that does this:
>
Hi James ;)
I have the following in my page class:
@Persist
public abstract Person getDoctor();
public abstract void setDoctor(Person person);
That should be enough, shouldn't it?
Kind regards,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
No no. Okay lets say I have some code in the page that does this:
displayMessage();
sendEmail();
How do you write a unit test that makes sure that the page actually
calls the second line? You could take it out and still have the tests
pass.
I found a lightweight email server at
http://www.ericda
Is the "doctor" property a persistent property? Did you declare it?
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Bulling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andreas Bulling
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 10:59 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Another question concerning the For component
Just to
Just to add the stack trace also to this thread - perhaps someone
can help me with it ;-)
org.apache.hivemind.ApplicationRuntimeException
Error at context:/WEB-INF/pages/ShowPatient.page, line 6,
column 21: Method 'public abstract de.plattform.domain.Person
de.plattform.pages.ShowPatient.getDoctor
I have a central repository (PageConstants.java) for page names. I
need to inject a page into another. The problem is that It doesn't
seem to work to inject the actual name of the page.
Let's say I have a page named Foo. I would therefore have the
following in PageConstants.java:
public stati
You don't typically unit test a mail server. That's a
deployment/configuration issue. If you're using JavaMail or Jakarta Commons
Email to send your emails, you can be pretty sure that the emails will go
out if your mail server is available and configured properly.
-Original Message-
Fro
Well, my page is going to display a message to the user letting them
know but that doesn't ACTUALLY mean that the email was sent or the
service was called. The way I have to do it right now is by having the
email sent to me and checking my email manually. I would love to have it
all automated thoug
Well, wouldn't you want to indicate to the user that the send was
successful or not? If so, you could just look for that. I know you
said that the submission doesn't affect the page but don't you want to
let the user know it worked?
-Mike
On 4/10/06, Dan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay,
On 10. Apr 2006 - 10:29:20, Mike Snare wrote:
| Clearly, some object used as an expression prefix on line 106 of
| ShowAdminPanel is null. Put a breakpoint there and see what it is.
Now it works - thanks! :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e
Okay, I have a page that, when submitted, sends an email. Now the page
uses a service via interface that actually does the emailing and that
service is tested separately. But how can I write a test that makes sure
that my page actually calls that service and that the email gets sent
since that does
Clearly, some object used as an expression prefix on line 106 of
ShowAdminPanel is null. Put a breakpoint there and see what it is.
-Mike
On 4/10/06, Andreas Bulling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10. Apr 2006 - 10:15:16, Mike Snare wrote:
> | Whenever you are asking for help with an exception,
On 10. Apr 2006 - 10:15:16, Mike Snare wrote:
| Whenever you are asking for help with an exception, it helps to
| automatically post the exception with stack trace (there are often
| more than one, post all of them).
|
| All you have said is that you are getting an
| ApplicationRuntimeException.
Whenever you are asking for help with an exception, it helps to
automatically post the exception with stack trace (there are often
more than one, post all of them).
All you have said is that you are getting an
ApplicationRuntimeException. Without more info, that's next to
meaningless.
-Mike
On
On 10. Apr 2006 - 15:52:29, Andreas Bulling wrote:
| I debugged the application step by step and the error
| seems to occur in the DirectService service() method
| when ResponseRenderer->renderResponse() gets called.
I did some more steps and it seems as if the error
occurs during page/component r
Please... Does one of the gurus have the (short) time to
try to help me with my problem? As I wrote I'm able to
create the DirectLinks using Java but when I click
on the link I get an ApplicationRuntimeException.
I debugged the application step by step and the error
seems to occur in the DirectSer
Hi,
I've developped a bulletinboard module in Tapestry that i would share in
several Tapestry application.
By sharing, i mean the bulltinboard is a rubric in each application so
it's the same but the header and the footer are different in each
application.
Is there a simple approach to do thi
As I recall, one of tap's stated goals is to become a framework
without a need for developers to extend any base class (i.e. BasePage,
BaseComponent). If that *is* a goal, it seems like this is not just
wanted, but needed.
-Mike
Then there's the whole composition vs. inheritance issue...
(http:/
I asked this same question about half a year ago. Most answers refer to
either annotations or using a smart subclassing of a given base class.
But what if you are still using Java 1.4 and hence not able to use
annotations and are neither willing to implement a subclassing solution,
because imho
the pt_BR locale... If this is a tapetry error and don't mine i can do that
;-) ...
On 4/10/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you be more specific about which locale this was for? Possibly firing
> a
> jira issue?
>
> On 4/10/06, Angelo Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
I must say that this notion of inserting common ASOs and services into
all pages has come up several times on this list in just the last
month I've been subscribing.
@Tap Team:
How difficult would it be to add the ability to either:
A) declare services/aso's as 'global' (or some better label),
Can you be more specific about which locale this was for? Possibly firing a
jira issue?
On 4/10/06, Angelo Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm update the tapestry 4.0 for 4.0.1and the validation don't change the
> placeholders, with the message "bla bla bla {0}". don't change to NAme,
Hi,
I'm update the tapestry 4.0 for 4.0.1and the validation don't change the
placeholders, with the message "bla bla bla {0}". don't change to NAme,
adress , etcc...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, Spindle is still under development. Per a message from Geoff on the
7th:
No I'm not dead and the project isn't either. Just stuck in a bit of a
death march at work until after the 15th.
Cheers,
Geoff
Korbinian Bachl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does any
Hello.
I wrote a cascade select component - it consists of two PropertySelections and
adjusts values list of the second when selection in first changes. This
component uses AjaxDirectLink to refresh second list.
My problem is that I can't attach FieldLabel to this component because
1. It does
Tyi, Spindle for T4 is in a deep coma, dying a very slow death! ;-)
F
On 4/10/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know if spindle for T4 is still under development ? - the
> spindle blog says "on vacancy from 24th on..." and the mailing list also
> has
> no big
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
