-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote: > I would rather keep the XML files around to *override* the annotations, > not because I can't use Java 5.0. Amen! [with a caveat that it should be _easy_ (whatever 'easy' is) to override] We'll have to see how this plays out.
> > As for the use of JDK 5.0, well... this is a release that's a ... year > from now? And we'll have to maintain backwards compatibility with Java > 1.1 or 1.2 or whatever at a time when - I think - most people are > actually thinking of moving forward. Now this debate has already > happenned... right? In moving from 4.X to 5.X it is possible to require 1.5 (guess it's *possible* anytime, but a major revision jump would be the logical place). And as you said - 5.0 is no where near even alpha so there's time for the 4.X thread to mature before we need to 'debate' much. > > I'm +1 to require JDK 5.0 but -1 to remove the XMLs but I guess we'll > have a lot of time to discuss that. > Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEOzRvaCoPKRow/gARAiBnAJwPOCaU748TLqCzGnvIKicPC9RGsgCgsQPx XDI6TJfGsoR95sd9xlSjnT8= =v0Nk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
