Like Mark says - it may make sense for Spindle to actually do that... I
wouldn't neccesarilly call it a "fear". It would probably be for the
benefit of having a much earlier T5 Spindle.
If Geoff is pressed for time anyway, it may make more sense to start
getting a T5 spindle out the door, rather than spending time on T4,
which will be "discontinued" by the time he finishes. At that point we
will have the same delay for Spindle for T5
MARK
And to make things worse... has Geoff has stated he is still using T3 at
work, so his efforts are on that direction... one has to pay the bills.
Really hope that Marks fears don't come true and that Spindle doesn't skip
T4!
Come on Geoff we're all holding our breaths out here! Keep it up! ;-)
On 4/10/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geoff is working on it when he has available cycles. And as we all know
free time is hard to come by. Currently, he is on some kind of death march
at his paying job so it will be a bit before he can get back to Spindle.
He has stated on the Spindle Development list that supporting 4.x is very
different than supporting 3.x. And now that 5.0 is being written that
will not be backward compatible with 4.x or 3.x, it makes me wonder if 4.xis
worth the effort? I don't know if he can get it done before
5.x starts becoming the next golden child.
Personally, I am staying on 3.x until the dust settles.
regards,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Francis Amanfo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 4/10/2006 6:01 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: spindle
Tyi, Spindle for T4 is in a deep coma, dying a very slow death! ;-)
F
On 4/10/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know if spindle for T4 is still under development ? - the
spindle blog says "on vacancy from 24th on..." and the mailing list also
has
no big signs about it....
Regards,
Korbinian
--
Pedro Viegas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
