Same feelings here.  I *like* the xml binding files and I'm not wild
about mixing too many presentation details in with my java code. 
(Although I suspect there would be some benefits like compiler type
checking.)


Mike Snare wrote:

>I hope not.  That would be horrible.  There's a good segment of us
>still using java 1.4 who would be significantly annoyed at that, and
>for good reason.
>
>I know that the tap developers don't tend to concern themselves with
>backward compatibility, but it seems you should try to *build* a user
>base -- not replace it wholesale.
>
>I really hope this statement is wrong.
>
>-Mike
>
>On 4/10/06, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>I just read on
>>http://www.virtuas.com/files/JavaWebFrameworkSweetSpots.pdf that T5 will
>>not have any XML configuration option any more, only annotations.
>>Is this true?
>>
>>MARK
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  
>

Reply via email to