Re: [Tagging] RFC - A broad look at fountains

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 10/10/22 21:36, Davidoskky via Tagging wrote: In Australia it would be unusual to find a drinking fountain without a tap to stop the flow when a person is not drinking. I think it could be illegal such is the scarcity of water. Thus, I believe that a world wide default should be avoided in

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 1/10/22 20:25, stevea wrote: Makes sense to me, too, Greg. I don't know if it helps or hinders wider understanding, but I understand what Greg is saying here, and while his perspective is "Eastern USA" (and mine is "Western USA"), these don't seem far apart or even different at all, and t

Re: [Tagging] sport without pitch but club : ok or tagging mistake ?

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 28/6/21 07:54, Tom Pfeifer wrote: I agree with Yves, the sport=* belongs where the sport is performed, not where the trophies are displayed and not where the thirst is quenched after the match. And I disagreed. The club=sport with sport=* details what sport the club is interested in. Ma

Re: [Tagging] sport without pitch but club : ok or tagging mistake ?

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 29/6/21 16:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 29 Jun 2021, at 01:52, bkil wrote: Could you please share an example of how you would tag a soccer club with a billiards table (access=customers) on a given floor inside a building way. Other parts of the building are used b

Re: [Tagging] sport without pitch but club : ok or tagging mistake ?

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 30/6/21 05:59, bkil wrote: Could a native speaker perhaps rephrase my question so it is easier to understand? The club - map as an area (might be the whole building). Tag it for the club .. club=sport, sport=soccer, name=* etc The billiards as a node within the area of the

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-11-12 Thread Greg Troxel
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> writes: > On 1/10/22 20:25, stevea wrote: >> Makes sense to me, too, Greg. I don't know if it helps or hinders >> wider understanding, but I understand what Greg is saying here, and >> while his perspective is "Eastern USA" (and mine is "Western USA"), >> these don'

Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=site + tourism=camp_site

2022-11-12 Thread Sven Geggus
Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > So > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13012999#map=19/49.12702/10.86422 > site relation is including nearby restaurant and shop? Right! > That are not actually part of camp site? Wellm, they are not part of it geographicaly because the are located o

Re: [Tagging] RFC - A broad look at fountains

2022-11-12 Thread Davidoskky via Tagging
Is this proposal functionally any different from the water outlet proposal? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_outlet I'm alright with using a name different from fountain since a lot of people disagree on that name. By doing all this you're effectively deprecating am

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-11-12 Thread Volker Schmidt
Most of the highway objects along waterways around here (Po Valley, Northern Italy) that are not open to public motor traffic, and wide enough for dual-track vehicles, are, in my view correctly, tagged as highway=track. They are used for waterway maintenance and for agricultural purposes on the ad

[Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread Evan Carroll
I don't see anything that would satisfy a donation_centre, a place where you can donate clothes and other items for resale. Goodwill is a local chain that operates donation centers, and stores. Things donated at the donation center are distributed at nearby stores. If nothing exists, any commentar

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread Timothy Noname
I think people already use Amenity=recycling Recycling_type=container or centre And then specify whether it takes clothes and shoes etc Recycling:clothes=yes On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, 16:35 Evan Carroll, wrote: > I don't see anything that would satisfy a donation_centre, a place > where you can donat

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread António Madeira
There's office=charity and shop=charity. I think the second one corresponds to what you're looking for. Regards, António. Às 19:26 de 12/11/2022, Timothy Noname escreveu: I think people already use Amenity=recycling Recycling_type=container or centre And then specify whether it takes clothes an

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 1/10/22 21:08, Timeo Gut wrote: On 30 Sep 2022, at 23:48, grin via Tagging wrote: Take a pretty common road type in Europe, which goes on the embankment of a river, which generally paved, narrow, legally open for walking and bicycling people, often part of the national/international bi

Re: [Tagging] RFC - A broad look at fountains

2022-11-12 Thread Warin
On 13/11/22 03:00, Davidoskky via Tagging wrote: Is this proposal functionally any different from the water outlet proposal? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_outlet There is a lot more to be done for something like this. It needs to incorporate all "man made sourc

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Vào lúc 11:26 2022-11-12, Timothy Noname đã viết: I think people already use Amenity=recycling Recycling_type=container or centre And then specify whether it takes clothes and shoes etc Recycling:clothes=yes Long ago, I helped to promote this overloading of amenity=recycling in the U.S. At the

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Vào lúc 12:06 2022-11-12, António Madeira đã viết: There's office=charity and shop=charity. I think the second one corresponds to what you're looking for. Maybe, but only if there's some tag to clarify that the shop=charity only accepts items as opposed to selling them. Apparently we avoided

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread António Madeira
I don't know of any charity which buys items to then resell or distribute them, although that can happen in some obscure situation. This, of course, assuming we're talking about a charity in the first place. If indeed it's a charity, then it's possible to refine it further to specify its type of

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-11-12 Thread Greg Troxel
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> writes: > I know of a road built for coal trucks by the coal firm tagged as > 'unclassified' yet it is a 'private road' not used by cyclist nor > pedestrians. The road standard is probably above that of > 'unclassified'. It runs from a coal mine to a power plant

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

2022-11-12 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 at 10:37, António Madeira wrote: > I don't know of any charity which buys items to then resell or > distribute them, although that can happen in some obscure situation. > There's that international thing appearing again! In Australia, *every* (or at least the vast majority?)