Am 15.08.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
sent from a phone
On 15. Aug 2018, at 07:43, Johannes Singler
wrote:
I'm just saying there is no absolutely blatant one-to-one
correlation addr:street<->highway
I would say there is, and in the other cases, addr:street is not the
righ
In Nederland the Stolpersteine project has caught on and there is a database. I
have been looking at entering this into OSM, just didnt get around to it yet.
It would be nice to have a single agreed-upon tagging scheme. Otherwise I will
copy the dominant German scheme, because Germany is the hom
Got it.
+5k nodes imported without brand key
Il 25 ago 2018 12:16 AM, "Graeme Fitzpatrick" ha
scritto:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 18:29, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 24. Aug 2018, at 09:57, Cascafico Giovanni
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > IMHO all records tagged brand="Pompe Bianche" don't
Bah, 8 votes on such a specialized feature is a nice score ;-).
Maybe you could have advertised on hot@ to gain more traction.
Yves ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 25/08/18 10:17, Dave Swarthout wrote:
I've been trying to decide tagging for slow-vehicle turnouts
consisting of a lane added to the right side (in the U.S.) of the road
so that slow moving vehicles can pull aside to allow following
vehicles to pass. The best I can come up with is the tag
h
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> W dniu 25.08.2018 o 02:49, Paul Allen pisze:
>
> I did some searching pretty much at random and found
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892971695 which has
> memorial=stoperstein + memorial:type=stolperstein, which is one way of
> handling
Kevin wrote:
> lanes:forward=* and lanes:backward=* is the best that I've found so
>far to describe truck climbing lanes and similar features. They don't
>appear in your image to be grade-separated, so they don't need to be
>separate ways - one way for each section of the road, with appropriate
>la
On 25/08/2018 01:17, Dave Swarthout wrote:
I've been trying to decide tagging for slow-vehicle turnouts
consisting of a lane added to the right side (in the U.S.) of the road
so that slow moving vehicles can pull aside to allow following
vehicles to pass. The best I can come up with is the tag
lanes:forward and lanes:backward is definitely correct here. No need to
make a whole new tag for it, and I really don't see how it's too tedious to
map this way (plus adding something like hgv:lanes:forward=no|designated
for the situation).
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 11:12 AM Dave Swarthout
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 09:13, Peter Elderson wrote:
> In Nederland the Stolpersteine project has caught on and there is a database.
Is that online, please?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tag
I am not sure. Once I get around to it I am sure I can find out by contacting
the right people. I think they are also registered as gravestones by the
funeral branche.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 25 aug. 2018 om 18:05 heeft Andy Mabbett het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 09:1
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2018, at 15:46, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> [lutz]
>> Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen
>> historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4
>> others who prefer historic=memorial + memorial=stolperstei
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> there is no definition for the plaque tag and I am not able to deduct a
> system by looking at the values:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/plaque#values
>
>
> Most used value is “metal” which would fit for a stolperstein
Done some more reading. Stolpersteine are not just metal plaques on some brick,
they are actually stones placed in the pavement. A Stolperstein is an object in
its own right. I think memorial=Stolperstein is fitting. With capital and all.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 25 aug. 2018 om 19:05 heeft Mart
ay. In
> Australia, they're overtaking lanes & can easily be a kilometre long, so
> only having a node doesn't work very well.
>
> Probably a new tag under the highway structure heading (ie bridge, tunnel
> etc) would be the best way?
>
> Thanks
>
> Gr
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 19:27, Cascafico Giovanni
wrote:
> Got it.
>
> +5k nodes imported without brand key
>
Great! :-)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Le 24. 08. 18 à 18:47, egil a écrit :
> I much prefer boundary=administrative + border_type=region over
> boundary=region and place=region.
some regions aren't a administrative stuff.
ex with mountain area http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7465762
or a valley https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 05:32, St Niklaas wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
> Have a look at this solution, made just to allow other / faster traffic to
> pass a slow agricultural vehicle, more specific it is a rule that goes for
> all slow moving traffic not reaching a speed of 25 km/hr.
>
> https://www.open
18 matches
Mail list logo
