In Nederland the Stolpersteine project has caught on and there is a database. I have been looking at entering this into OSM, just didnt get around to it yet. It would be nice to have a single agreed-upon tagging scheme. Otherwise I will copy the dominant German scheme, because Germany is the home of the project.
Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 25 aug. 2018 om 03:11 heeft Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> het volgende > geschreven: > > W dniu 25.08.2018 o 02:49, Paul Allen pisze: > >> I did some searching pretty much at random and found >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892971695 which has memorial=stoperstein >> + memorial:type=stolperstein, which is one way of handling the problem. > > Dual tagging of a single feature is just a workaround (not a "tagging for > rendering" though, because it doesn't lie about reality) and I bet this is > done for rendering it on OSM.org (by OSM Carto). > > But since a direct reason for this change is proposed change in OSM Carto > rendering (making Stolpersteine less obtrusive, like plaque), there will be > no more a need to do this. > > I also think it could help other data consumers. > >> So it would be nice if whatever you decide doesn't break that. Have a word >> with lutz - he's a nice guy. > > Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen > historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4 > others who prefer historic=memorial + memorial=stolperstein): > > https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=712055#p712055 > > > -- > "My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Apple] > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
