On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > W dniu 25.08.2018 o 02:49, Paul Allen pisze: > > I did some searching pretty much at random and found > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892971695 which has > memorial=stoperstein + memorial:type=stolperstein, which is one way of > handling the problem. > > > Dual tagging of a single feature is just a workaround (not a "tagging for > rendering" though, because it doesn't lie about reality) and I bet this is > done for rendering it on OSM.org (by OSM Carto). >
Sometimes a workaround is the best you can achieve. Possibly with a fixme noting that it should be cleaned up when (if) there is common agreement amongs mappers and renderers. If we're lucky, though, an agreement might be reached quickly. [lutz] > Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen > historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4 > others who prefer historic=memorial + memorial=stolperstein): > Since lutz is the main driving force behind heritage=* and historic=* and related tagging, his opinion is informed. Looks like a reasonable way of tagging it to me. I like the idea of plaque=* for adding fine detail because a mapper encountering a plaque may be unaware that the type of plaque (stolperstein, blue plaque...) has its own category. Others may disagree. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
