If you want to see other discussions, here's a link to all discussions
about the tag amenity=driving_school
site:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/
amenity=driving_school
There are two different camps, one for "duck tagging"[1] and one for
structured tagging that you are proposing
Whoops, wrong link to a Google search:
https://www.google.hr/?client=firefox-b-ab#q=site:https:%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Fpipermail%2Ftagging%2F+amenity%3Ddriving_school
sri, 6. srp 2016. u 10:49 Janko Mihelić napisao je:
> If you want to see other discussions, here's a link to all discuss
Hi all,
I'm wondering about tagging for subway_entrances. I've seen "steps=yes" on
some.
In my view, it would make sense the label subway_entrances e.g. as follows:
wheelchair=yes
steps=yes
conveying=yes
indicating that the entrance ("conceptually" offers these features). Do you
agree?
Also se
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 14:23, Bjoern Hassler
> ha scritto:
>
> In my view, it would make sense the label subway_entrances e.g. as follows:
>
> wheelchair=yes
> steps=yes
> conveying=yes
>
> indicating that the entrance ("conceptually" offers these features). Do
Hi Martin,
thanks for the response. Sure, the features can be mapped separately.
However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are accessible? If
the lift is mapped separately, it won't be mapped as a subway_entrance (as
there should only be one subway_entrance per physical entrance)?
It
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:05, Bjoern Hassler
> ha scritto:
>
>
> However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are accessible? If the
> lift is mapped separately, it won't be mapped as a subway_entrance (as there
> should only be one subway_entrance per
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:23 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:05, Bjoern Hassler l.com> ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are
> > accessible? If the lift is mapped separately, it won't b
> However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are accessible? If
> the lift is mapped separately, it won't be mapped as a subway_entrance (as
> there should only be one subway_entrance per physical entrance)?
>
>
>
> I don't follow you here. If the lift leads to the subway, why couldn't I
Certainly wheelchair=yes/no in conjunction with railway=subway_entrance is
used a lot in central London:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/hap
Bjoern
On 6 July 2016 at 15:33, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:23 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> >
> > sent from a phone
> >
> > Il g
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:33, Philip Barnes
> ha scritto:
>
> A subway entrance normally leads into a ticket hall where there are
> machines to buy tickets, the barriers and then the lift and/or stairs
> are beyond those.
what is normal for you can be completely
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:34 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> >
> > Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:33, Philip Barnes > t.me.uk> ha scritto:
> >
> > A subway entrance normally leads into a ticket hall where there are
> > machines to buy tickets, the barriers and th
Hello,
I suggest two additions to the public transport scheme:
1. a "placename" (or "place") tag for stop_position, platform and
stop_area. I notice that most public transport companies have a somewhat
separate idea of a place name and a stop name. For example: "New York,
Grand Central Termin
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
>
> 1. a "placename" (or "place") tag for stop_position, platform and stop_area.
> I notice that most public transport companies have a somewhat separate idea
> of a place name and a stop name.
This sounds like the destination names on road si
On 07-07-16 01:28, John Willis wrote:
On Jul 7, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
1. a "placename" (or "place") tag for stop_position, platform and stop_area. I
notice that most public transport companies have a somewhat separate idea of a place name and a
stop name.
This sounds like
Hi,
On 07/07/2016 08:04 AM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> It's the place the stop is _in_.
We usually resolve such issues by looking at the surrounding
administrative area polygons. You will see that, for example, we have
long since stopped tagging a village with
"is_in=CountyA,StateB,CountryC" because th
We don't do it for street names... There is a High Street in every town
and we seem to survive...
You could use geolocation or your own geometry to find the place
enclosing (or nearest to) the stop
You could use the is_in tag to provide this information (not sure about
the status of this tag)
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> For example:
> - in most of rural Belgium, " " is used (as in
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/59518#map=17/51.23869/4.57898&layers=T)
There was some kind of vote on the Belgian mailing list a few years
ago to chose between just "" or "
On 2016-07-07 08:15, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/07/2016 08:04 AM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
>
>> It's the place the stop is _in_.
>
> We usually resolve such issues by looking at the surrounding
> administrative area polygons. You will see that, for example, we have
> long since stopped tag
18 matches
Mail list logo
