Whoops, wrong link to a Google search: https://www.google.hr/?client=firefox-b-ab#q=site:https:%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Fpipermail%2Ftagging%2F+amenity%3Ddriving_school
sri, 6. srp 2016. u 10:49 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> napisao je: > If you want to see other discussions, here's a link to all discussions > about the tag amenity=driving_school > > site:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/ > amenity=driving_school > > There are two different camps, one for "duck tagging"[1] and one for > structured tagging that you are proposing. The duck tagging is winning for > now, there are 8123 amenity=driving_school elements, and only 68 > training=driving_school. So I suggest we stick to duck tagging. > > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duck_tagging > > Janko > > sri, 6. srp 2016. u 05:40 wille <wille....@gmail.com> napisao je: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm new in this discussion list, sorry if this subject was already >> discussed. >> >> I believe we don't have approved tags for non formal education >> institutions, like language schools, music and other art schools, etc. I >> saw that there are two proposals, one for amenity=music_school and other to >> amenity=language_school. On other side we have a proposal of >> amenity=training, with an additional tag training=*. >> >> How can I help to accelerate the approval of one of these tags, so our >> editor software could support and stimulate the users to map it in a proper >> way? >> >> I think amenity=training plus training=* is the better way to map it, but >> I'm not sure if training is the best word to describe those places. What do >> you think about it? >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- >> Wille >> http://wille.blog.br >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
