Hi Jerry,
...or we identify use cases we want to handle (and thereby take a
conscious decision to "de-scope" other use cases), and ensure that our
model is fit for (our) purpose. Then map the "official" data model onto
the "internal" model. This mapping will probably be a one-way mapping,
i.e.
> Am 29.05.2015 um 18:08 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> Is it safe to remove this suggestion template then?
+1, hifi is a more detailed tag for some kind of shops and not a synonym for
electronics
There is even space for more detailed subtagging like these freak shops for
audiophiles (golden pl
On 30/05/2015 8:19 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 29.05.2015 um 18:08 schrieb Daniel Koć :
Is it safe to remove this suggestion template then?
+1, hifi is a more detailed tag for some kind of shops and not a synonym for
electronics
There is even space for more detailed subtagging like th
We try to make some conclusions regarding rendering fountains on default
map:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/705
The discussion is rendering centered, but we need some tagging hints to
resolve it properly.
The main issue is that some fountains are in fact big (nam
The "abandoned" or "disused" tags are for a structure that is not currently
being used for anything. If the structure is currently being used for a
different purpose, it is not abandoned or disused. Nonetheless, you can
often tell what its original purpose was from the shape. You can often tell
> Am 29.05.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> Sure, I know it. But it would mean that building=church is rather just a
> building form, not the "amenity" in any way, as suggested. Then if we also
> make building=industrial + man_made=works, it's kind of logical, because
> building=indus
> Am 30.05.2015 um 00:11 schrieb John Willis :
>
> Maybe you are just supposed to use building=church and shop=poodles for a
> church that was converted into a poodle shop - but i imagine that would be
> only if it was really really obvious that it was a church, not just by its
> shape, but
> On May 31, 2015, at 2:20 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> hat's the kind of tags we can use to describe this situation, if it doesn't
> help, maybe you have to be even more specific with the value?
Im saying that unless the building is of particular significance, interest,
and/or obv
On 30 May 2015 at 02:01, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/05/2015 9:40 AM, pmailkeey . wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29 May 2015 at 13:06, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
>> W dniu 29.05.2015 13:47, pmailkeey . napisał(a):
>>
>>> On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34,
On 30 May 2015 at 06:33, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If museums are not an amenity but building? Are all mappable 'museums'
>> buildings? I don't know.
>
>
> No, you're right, there are museums in parks. see e.g.[1] located he
On 30 May 2015 at 18:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 30.05.2015 um 00:11 schrieb John Willis :
> >
> > Maybe you are just supposed to use building=church and shop=poodles for
> a church that was converted into a poodle shop - but i imagine that would
> be only if it was really reall
On 30/05/2015 10:02 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
We try to make some conclusions regarding rendering fountains on
default map:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/705
The discussion is rendering centered, but we need some tagging hints
to resolve it properly.
The main issue
W dniu 31.05.2015 1:33, Warin napisał(a):
Big?
Height over, say, 5 metres? Use the height= tag.
Width/length over, say, 10 metres? Use the appropriate tag.
{There is no diameter tag? Could be usefull for pipelines and
fountains and silos and etc..}
I mean big like the whole area:
https://git
13 matches
Mail list logo
