Re: [Tagging] Edit of wiki page amenity=drinking_water for man_made=water_tap

On 5/04/2015 3:37 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: The proper way to tag water tap with drinking water is to use both and amenity=drinking_water and man_made=water_tap. No. The correct way is man_made=water_tap drinking_water=yes See the wiki.. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3D

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On 5/04/2015 4:16 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: On 5/04/2015 8:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: This mailing list community veers toward nit picking and bike shedding, and tends to block rathe

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

W dniu 05.04.2015 8:16, Bryce Nesbitt napisał(a): So come up with a better word. Let's find common ground to improve the wiki's role in the project. The misunderstanding in the role of the wiki vote has been persistent, harmful, and long standing. In my opinion this is the key problem - it's

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

Hi, On 04/05/2015 08:16 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > The misunderstanding in the role of the wiki vote has been persistent, > harmful, and long standing. Yes. Together with the concept of "deprecated" by the way; and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features which for similar reasons

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

2015-04-05 7:16 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt : > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 5/04/2015 8:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: >> >> This mailing list community veers toward nit picking and bike shedding, >> and tends to block rather than guide forward change. It

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On 05.04.2015 19:01, Dan S wrote: It's such a chuffing tiny innocent suggestion, and it's thoroughly bikeshedded into the ground! As always, voices againt may sounds louder, howeverI have the feeling that changing 'approved' to 'recommended' or 'published' is doable. Yves

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Reception Desk

Nice that you follow the "new", unwritten rules. Sorry, but I usually only vote by using the tag and not on the wiki, still I would say, give it more time and improve the documentation as we will need it anyway (both the tag and its docu). Cheers fly Am 01.04.2015 um 03:02 schrieb Warin: > Hi,

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On 05/04/2015, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I really see two paths - either continue what I did, let the Wiki use > terms like "approved" but make it clear enough to everyone that the Wiki > isn't the OSM bible but just what a very small number of people think > about OSM; or try to increase the standin

[Tagging] New values for entrance=

Tl;dr: suggesting: Entrance= student, employee, visitor In Japan (and I assume other Asian schools) there is a separation between The "main entrance" and the "student entrance". As you change shoes when you go indoors, every single primary, middle, and high school has a separate large entran

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

Sounds good. Is there a similar dual entrance concept for other classes of building, or is this just a school thing? -- Many western buildings have a service entrance, but this would definitely not be for visitors. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@opens

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

Mosques often have separate entrances for men and women. On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:34 AM Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Sounds good. > > Is there a similar dual entrance concept for other classes of building, or > is this just a school thing? > > -- > Many western buildings have a service entrance, but t

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 10:50 +0900, John Willis wrote: > Tl;dr: suggesting: > Entrance= student, employee, visitor > > > In Japan (and I assume other Asian schools) there is a separation > between The "main entrance" and the "student entrance". As you change > shoes when you go indoors, every si

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > Sounds good. > > Is there a similar dual entrance concept for other classes of building, or is > this just a school thing? > besides the usual separation of visitor-customer / employee-staff / delivery-service entrances that exist at

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

why would you not just use the access tag to define who can use the entrance? Jonathan --- http://bigfatfrog67.me From: John Willis Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎6‎ ‎April‎ ‎2015 ‎02‎:‎50 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Tl;dr: suggesting: Entrance= student, e

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum wrote: > > Mosques often have separate entrances for men and women. Isn’t there a method for tagging gender and age restrictions already? entrances are often labeled by title restrictions (visitor/student/employee/delivery). so entrance=yes/visit

Re: [Tagging] New values for entrance=

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 2:54 PM, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote: > > why would you not just use the access tag to define who can use the entrance? > entrance=* aleady defines the entrance by access type (emergency, delivery, main, service), so it looks as if the entrance encodes the “title” of t