Nice that you follow the "new", unwritten rules. Sorry, but I usually only vote by using the tag and not on the wiki, still I would say, give it more time and improve the documentation as we will need it anyway (both the tag and its docu).
Cheers fly Am 01.04.2015 um 03:02 schrieb Warin: > Hi, > > I have taken this back to the Draft status/stage. > > There is not much of a change to the basic proposal amenity=reception_desk. > > There is a much more verbose explanation of things .. like what key to use. > > Summary of voting .. > > Thank you all for voting. 38 votes is I hope a good representation. > > 21 for > > 17 against. > > Of those against; > 10 state it should not be an amenity key and most of those are for it > being in the tourism key. > My failing there for not explaining that it has applications to offices, > industries and educational areas where tourism is not an appropriate key. > > 1 says it needs more time. > > > 1 says it is not necessarily a desk. > I have never come across one that was not a desk - telephone, public > address system and sign in in all housed on a desk. > > 2 (with another supportive comment from someone else) says it should > embedded in 'the indoor tagging scheme'. > The 'indoor tagging scheme'? That is going to have the same kind of > problems with the tags for toilets, telephones, shops swimming pools, > etc etc. The problem posed by this tag exists for many others and will > need to be addressed by the indoor tagging system NOT by this tag > alone. The 'indoor tagging system' looks to be in evolution ... and > will probably take some time before being generally accepted. > > How is reception desk shown to be part of another feature? By its > location in most instances. It has also been suggest that a site > relation could be used. The site relation looks to be in some state of > 'proposed'... I could not hazard a guess as to when it will progress > onwards. > (proposed) relation > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Provides_feature > > Also note the other proposal > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Cluster > > I don't see how the problem can be addressed by the simple value of the > proposed reception_desk .. particularly as it is a problem/solution for > other things too? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
