, 2018 03:41
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Urbex
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2018-January/018279.html
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Andy Mabbett mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> > wrote:
On 8 January 2018 at 23:39, Kevin Ken
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2018-January/018279.html
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On 8 January 2018 at 23:39, Kevin Kenny
> wrote:
>
> > Witness municipalities asking us to remove their
> > streets from the map
>
> When & where did that happen?
>
>
On 8 January 2018 at 23:39, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Witness municipalities asking us to remove their
> streets from the map
When & where did that happen?
[off-topic for the tagging list, so please feel free to point me to an
alternative venue]
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.
A lot of good food for thought, be it in favor or not in favor of mapping it.
Thanks for the feedback.
I could see room for mapping, potentially in great details even (e.g. is there
under-water exploration, cave exploration, toxic material detected, what kind
of hazards you could be exposed to,
On January 8, 2018 11:39:51 PM GMT+00:00, Kevin Kenny
wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
>
>wrote:
>
>> are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we
>map
>> it?
>>
>
>Some seem to think so. Witness municipalities asking us to remove their
>streets
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> +1 as well. As an active explorer, I wouldn't encourage mapping those.
> It has no use outside the very close and sometimes closed community, which
> has many means (fora, facebook pages) to share those locations.
>
> Also, most urban explorers
On 09-01-18 08:01, Michal Fabík wrote:
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Should it be mapped at all?
Hi,
I don't think it should be mapped. I used to take part in it years ago
and I can tell you that the environments where UrbEx can be practiced
are so highl
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:14 PM, marc marc wrote:
> if it is a specialized place for urbex training, it is interesting to
> add leisure=urban_exploration and/or urbex=yes
I'm pretty sure there's no such thing as "urbex training". Urbex is
essentially climbing over rusted chain-link fences, walking
it depends on what it is.
if it is a specialized place for urbex training, it is interesting to
add leisure=urban_exploration and/or urbex=yes.
if it is to describe that this place is usable in urbex as half the city
or is likely to host activities often illegally, I find it inappropriate
to add
On 09-Jan-18 10:41 AM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Having said that, yes, we should be mapping some dangerous areas (mine
shafts & minefields are 2 that come to mind), but as a warning to not
go there.
I know of one minefield area that is mapped the same way westerners map
speed cameras
+1 for Michal's thoughts.
Thus not mapping it explicitly. Whoever wants to find spots suitable for
Urbex should
look for ruins/abandoned etc.
Regards
Moritz
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should it be mapped at all?
Hi,
I don't think it should be mapped. I used to take part in it years ago
and I can tell you that the environments where UrbEx can be practiced
are so highly varied I can't think of any meaningful
On 09-Jan-18 08:51 AM, OSMDoudou wrote:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059.
I initially thought Urbex would be the former name of the factory
("Exploitation de craie abandonée" = "abandoned clay exploitation" in
English), but it seems it rather stan
That's the question - are we?
If we're showing a spot on the map that you can go exploring potentially
hazardous, possibly out-of-bounds areas, then are we supporting the idea, &
if so, should we be? It's one thing to say "this is an abandoned factory",
but should we then be pointing out that peop
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we map
> it?
>
Some seem to think so. Witness municipalities asking us to remove their
streets
from the map, public land managers asking us not to map certain trails, and
2018-01-08 23:12 GMT+01:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> I don't know if OSM should be seen to be possibly supporting /
> recommending / encouraging it?
>
are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we map it?
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging
On 9 January 2018 at 07:51, OSMDoudou <
19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059.
>
>From reading the Wiki article, in conjunction with the little I already
knew of the concept, it strikes me as a bo
17 matches
Mail list logo
