A lot of good food for thought, be it in favor or not in favor of mapping it. Thanks for the feedback.
I could see room for mapping, potentially in great details even (e.g. is there under-water exploration, cave exploration, toxic material detected, what kind of hazards you could be exposed to, etc.). This is to me the criteria: tagging the feature as "abandoned" is not explicitly implying anything else than it's observable state. Of course, the information can be abused by miscreants but it still serves many legal purposes in the first place, whereas tagging urbex is implying an activity described as more often dodgy than legal by the experts themselves. I decided to delete the node. If a legal or tolerated activity later emerges, it's still time to tag it then. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging