A lot of good food for thought, be it in favor or not in favor of mapping it. 
Thanks for the feedback.
I could see room for mapping, potentially in great details even (e.g. is there 
under-water exploration, cave exploration, toxic material detected, what kind 
of hazards you could be exposed to, etc.).

This is to me the criteria: tagging the feature as "abandoned" is not 
explicitly implying anything else than it's observable state. Of course, the 
information can be abused by miscreants but it still serves many legal purposes 
in the first place, whereas tagging urbex is implying an activity described as 
more often dodgy than legal by the experts themselves.

I decided to delete the node. If a legal or tolerated activity later emerges, 
it's still time to tag it then.


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to