it depends on what it is. if it is a specialized place for urbex training, it is interesting to add leisure=urban_exploration and/or urbex=yes. if it is to describe that this place is usable in urbex as half the city or is likely to host activities often illegally, I find it inappropriate to add this info in osm.
Le 08. 01. 18 à 22:51, OSMDoudou a écrit : > Hello, > > I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059. > > I initially thought Urbex would be the former name of the factory > ("Exploitation de craie abandonée" = "abandoned clay exploitation" in > English), but it seems it rather stands for "Urban Exploration": > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_exploration. > > I wanted to improve the tagging, but Im not sure what to choose. > > I thought an area for the land piece with: > * abandoned:landuse=industrial > * resource=clay > * description=Exploitation de craie abandonée > > And an area for the building on the land piece with: > * abandoned:building=industrial > > But what about the urban exploration activity ? > > I couldn't find something helpful in the Wiki and I found only two > occurrences of urbex=yes on taginfo: > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/urbex. > > Though not popular, urbex=yes could make sense but then only as an > additional tag, I suppose. > > Probably leisure would be suitable because urbex is not a physical something > but an entertaining activity conducted at the place. > > So, I thought of a node with: > * leisure=urban_exploration (or urbex ?) > * urbex=yes (to be consistent with the other two existing occurences of the > tag, but is it advisable ?) > * description=Urban Exploration > * wikipedia=en:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_exploration (because > there is not documentation of urbex on OSM Wiki, I was thinking of a link to > Wikipedia instead; because urbex puzzled me, it will likely puzzle someone > lese and a link on the tag might come handy, even if to a generic article) > * informal=yes (ultimately, it's a probably a private place and even if > exploration was doable in practice without too much trouble, it's probably > not official and I'm not inclined to tag access=permissive because it might > imply a sort of permission was given but I have no evidence of that from my > armchair). > > What would you recommend to improve the tagging ? > > Thx. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
