If I vote 'no' it is because I've listened to all the discussions and feel
that I've been left with no alternative. My decision should be respected.
Stated reasons are often taken as an opportunity to browbeat the dissenters
into taking it back.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 20:18 Brian M. Sperlongano,
wr
Hello,
I agree Andy nearly completely, but I would recommend Brecht to create
the wiki page for the tag
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:virtual_tour with maybe a link
to the proposal and information that the discussion is ongoing, and a
short comment on what you intend by the key and what
If I understand the OP correctly, the issue is people that vote "no"
without giving a reason. In which case, I would reply in-thread and ask
the no voter to state their reason, even if it is "I agree with the
position of Person X". After all, it is not particularly helpful to the
proposal author i
Hello,
On 18/11/2024 14:00, brecht devriese wrote:
> So it is normal that it cannot be found in taginfo as it has never
been used before
This actually isn't normal.
One of the reasons that OSM got to where it is today, leaving numerous
other "free map" competitors by the roadside, is that p
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:11 AM brecht devriese
wrote:
> The only reason this one person rejects the proposal is because the tag
> has never been used in OSM.
>
For the avoidance of doubt, the "no" vote was:
--> I oppose this proposal. It makes no sense to "approve" this tag - it
has never been
Hey,
Happy to provide some more context. The tag being voted is a brand new tag
that has never been used before namely virtual_tour. So it is normal that
it cannot be found in taginfo as it has never been used before.
The only reason this one person rejects the proposal is because the tag has
nev
people are allowed to be against for reasons you dislike or consider stupid
this does not make this votes invalid and there is no way to invalidate them
Nov 16, 2024, 14:39 by brecht.devries...@gmail.com:
> Hey,
>
> I ask myself the following question but do not immediately find an answer.
> W
Sometimes people really votes for simular reasons ("this tag is used only *
times"), that is against purpose of the proposal process (development and
documenting of "the best practices"), approval of widely used tags is
harmless, but give little benefits.
Actually no way for nullification votes ag
Try to address whatever reasons were given on the linked discussion
threads. Then create a new proposal by mentioning you have fixed all
said things, linking to the earlier proposal and then put it up for
another set of voting. It will converge over time, or lazy people will
start giving better rea
Hey,
I ask myself the following question but do not immediately find an answer.
With a wiki proposal during voting, can one have an "I appose" vote
invalidated if no thorough reason is given ? Such as, for example, I oppose
this proposal. It makes no sense to "approve" this tag - it has never been
10 matches
Mail list logo
