Re: [Tagging] Landuse=forestRY?

Edit ... what I meant to say ... and some additions... On 27/12/2015 3:13 PM, Warin wrote: On 27/12/2015 12:19 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: I think you are overreaching a bit on this. For one thing, not all forests are for wood production - rubber tree plantations for example are for extracting s

Re: [Tagging] Landuse=forestRY?

On 27/12/2015 12:19 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: I think you are overreaching a bit on this. For one thing, not all forests are for wood production - rubber tree plantations for example are for extracting sap from trees. Had not thought of that. Some trees produce nuts, others fruit .. they would

Re: [Tagging] Landuse=forestRY?

I think you are overreaching a bit on this. For one thing, not all forests are for wood production - rubber tree plantations for example are for extracting sap from trees. Natural=wood seems perfectly correct to me for stands of trees in a more or less "natural" state whereas landcover=trees impli

Re: [Tagging] Landuse=forestRY?

On 27/12/2015 00:43, Warin wrote: Hi, The present multiple applications landuse=forest has me thinking that a new tag of landuse=forestry maybe best to focus this new tag onto a specific forest use - that of wood production. For info, I have used that (once!): http://www.openstreetmap.o

[Tagging] Landuse=forestRY?

Hi, The present multiple applications landuse=forest has me thinking that a new tag of landuse=forestry maybe best to focus this new tag onto a specific forest use - that of wood production. In the longer term the tag landuse=forest can eventually be depreciated .. people can migrate the o

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

> On Dec 26, 2015, at 9:30 PM, Matthijs Melissen > wrote: > > For indoor aquatics centres, I can imagine the leisure=aquatics_centre > would normally be placed on the building. This comes back to the landuse=civic (civic_admin /civic_services) discussion. Obviously the private facilities a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

On 25 December 2015 at 22:38, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > What about parkings for customers? Given that it is typical associated > amenity it may be a good idea to also list it after "small cafe or > bar". I had a look at the data, but for comparable facilities such as water parks, sport centres a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Discourage amenity=swimming pool

On 26 December 2015 at 13:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I would write "discouraged" rather than "DISCOURAGED". I can change it in the main text, but I'd prefer to leave it like that in the description, so it's more clear to users of Taginfo that the tag should not be used. -- Matthijd

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Discourage amenity=swimming pool

On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:13:49 +0100 Matthijs Melissen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a proposal page to explicitly mark the tag > amenity=swimming_pool as deprecated in the wiki: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Discourage_amenity%3Dswimming_pool > > The proposal is

Re: [Tagging] HOA-required names

On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-26 at 17:45 +0900, John Willis wrote: > > > > > On Dec 26, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Shawn K. Quinn > wrote: > > > > > > basically just someone's driveway > > > > It may not be an official name, as in an official city public road.

Re: [Tagging] HOA-required names

Paul Johnson wrote on 2015/12/26 08:48: Are names of private roads required by HOA's noteworthy enough to put into OSM? I remember passing this once in Fountain, CO and just happened upon it again in the headlines, and made me wonder since it is something that is a well known area landmark.

Re: [Tagging] HOA-required names

On Sat, 2015-12-26 at 17:45 +0900, John Willis wrote: > > > On Dec 26, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > > > basically just someone's driveway > > It may not be an official name, as in an official city public road. > > But it is a named road. Even service roads can have names, and t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

> On Dec 26, 2015, at 8:40 AM, tomoya muramoto wrote: > > I made a drawing Looks great! Thanks for good diagram. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] HOA-required names

> On Dec 26, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > basically just someone's driveway It may not be an official name, as in an official city public road. But it is a named road. Even service roads can have names, and the private residential roads in a large housing complex are easy to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

tomoya muramoto wrote on 2015/12/26 00:40: Hi, I made a drawing comparison of aquatics_centre/sports_centre/water_park tagging. Is this correct? That would be my understanding as well. However we might need to explore if an aquatics_centre is a specific kind of a sports_centre, thus we could

Re: [Tagging] HOA-required names

The thing is, a sign with a name could be helpful even if it's not official. Also, in Alaska especially, these names have a habit of becoming official after they've been in use for a few years. I dunno - it's your call.

Re: [Tagging] HOA-required names

On Sat, 2015-12-26 at 01:48 -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > Are names of private roads required by HOA's noteworthy enough to put > into OSM? I remember passing this once in Fountain, CO and just > happened upon it again in the headlines, and made me wonder since it > is something that is a well know