On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:52:29 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/9/15 Elizabeth Dodd :
>
> > I would have put 'craft' under industrial, and then used 'trade' but
> > craft is too far processed to consider a complete alternative.
>
>
> this might be a cultural difference, but IMHO craft is
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:53 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2010/9/15 Nathan Edgars II :
>> I've used it, and it's a natural extension of highway=stop. Maybe the
>> highway tag is overloaded; you can't tag a node that's both
>> traffic_signals and motorway_junction or crossing. But give_way isn'
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:57 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> It does seem, however, that it would seem to make more sense to either have
> separate nodes for each of the possible directions, or have some other way of
> signifying which direction or directions the stop sign applies to.
http://wiki
It does seem, however, that it would seem to make more sense to either have
separate nodes for each of the possible directions, or have some other way of
signifying which direction or directions the stop sign applies to. Frequently,
only some of the traffic directions at an intersection are req
On 16 September 2010 06:52, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> this might be a cultural difference, but IMHO craft is the mere
> opposite of industrial
It's somewhere between hobby and industrial...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://l
2010/9/15 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> Recently I stumbled upon a tag sneaked into the wiki without (AFAIK)
>> any discussion or announcement on this list.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way
>
> I've used it, and
2010/9/15 Elizabeth Dodd :
> I would have put 'craft' under industrial, and then used 'trade' but
> craft is too far processed to consider a complete alternative.
this might be a cultural difference, but IMHO craft is the mere
opposite of industrial
cheers,
Martin
_
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Recently I stumbled upon a tag sneaked into the wiki without (AFAIK)
> any discussion or announcement on this list.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way
I've used it, and it's a natural extension of highway=sto
(copied to the talk-us list)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Antony Pegg wrote:
> ok I can't figure this out and its driving me crazy!
>
> please look at this map:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.024&lon=-76.242&zoom=9&layers=M
>
>
> In the middle of it you will see "West Lampeter"
>
> if
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:59:49 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> If people would ask here before simply sneaking in tags, there would
> probably be less mess in the wiki and our tagging structure.
Certainly.
I haven't tagged highway=give_way but I have definitely put in new shop
categories withou
ok I can't figure this out and its driving me crazy!
please look at this map:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.024&lon=-76.242&zoom=9&layers=M
In the middle of it you will see "West Lampeter"
if you zoom in to ZL 10, you will see "Lancaster" finally show up as a
label.
If you zoom back out
Am 15. September 2010 19:53 schrieb Matthias Meißer :
> Hi Martin,
>
> you spot exactly the point. There are a few tags in different tagging pages
> that have one of this: no discussion, not wellknown, unvoted
the problem is, that until they fit into our common logics they are
quite welcome to me
On 16 September 2010 04:36, Richard Welty wrote:
>> railway=service... I haven't checked but I wouldn't be surprised if
>> railway=depot already exists...
>>
> a quick check suggests depot is not currently showing in the wiki
> for tagging.
I wasn't talking about the wiki, I'm suggesting people m
On 9/15/10 1:38 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 16 September 2010 00:16, Richard Welty wrote:
i agree, there are other kinds of depot besides these transportation
related ones (military depots, for example.) while right this instant
i'm mostly interested in the transportation ones, there's no reason
2010/9/16 Matthias Meißer :
> I have no clue how to improve the situation, there were no real good ideas
> in how to improve/reanimate the proposal process
No, there were no ideas that everyone would be happy with.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@opens
Hi Martin,
you spot exactly the point. There are a few tags in different tagging
pages that have one of this: no discussion, not wellknown, unvoted
I started a topic back in August with the aim to clean the wiki:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-August/003518.html
but ther
On 16 September 2010 00:16, Richard Welty wrote:
> i agree, there are other kinds of depot besides these transportation
> related ones (military depots, for example.) while right this instant
> i'm mostly interested in the transportation ones, there's no reason
> to exclude the broader usage, whic
2010/9/15 Pieren :
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> There are
>> no indications on how to use this (on a node part of the highway or
>> beside it). Why is this a highway-tag?
>>
>
> Consistent with the very similar tag highway=stop which is fine for me (but
> r
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> There are
> no indications on how to use this (on a node part of the highway or
> beside it). Why is this a highway-tag?
>
>
Consistent with the very similar tag highway=stop which is fine for me (but
raises the same questions).
Piere
On 9/15/10 9:50 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Depot should IMHO not be a highway-tag (I'd
prefer to keep highway related to streets, paths and similar).
i agree, there are other kinds of depot besides these transportation
related ones (military depots, for example.) while right this instant
Recently I stumbled upon a tag sneaked into the wiki without (AFAIK)
any discussion or announcement on this list.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way
Actually we do have a proposal process and if the creator would have
used it, there probably wouldn't be such a bad descripti
2010/9/15 John F. Eldredge :
> A garage is highway-related, but it isn't a way. As far as I know, all of
> the other usages of the highway tag are a road, path, track, motorway, or
> some other type of way.
I agree (the only exception I am aware of is highway=bus_stop on nodes
(actually lookin
A garage is highway-related, but it isn't a way. As far as I know, all of the
other usages of the highway tag are a road, path, track, motorway, or some
other type of way.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages
From :mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Date
Pieren wrote:
> > Most examples listed by Richard seemed to be highway related...
> >
> >
> >
> but parking is also highway related...
> Why not
> "amenity=depot" ?
Proposed depot are close to parking (access private and special
purpose), so it seems a good idea to stay close to parking tag for
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:58 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> Most examples listed by Richard seemed to be highway related...
>
>
>
but parking is also highway related...
Why not
"amenity=depot" ?
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
On 15 September 2010 19:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> yes for the subtags, but why "highway"?
Most examples listed by Richard seemed to be highway related...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
2010/9/15 John Smith :
> On 15 September 2010 08:48, Richard Welty wrote:
>> so depot really sounds ok.
>
> So...
>
> highway=depot
> depot=bus|communication|road_works|
yes for the subtags, but why "highway"?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing l
2010/9/15 Katie Filbert :
>> these are the obvious ones, although there are also
>> garages devoted to commercial vehicle fleets.
>>
>> anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> I would tag them as amenity=parking + access=private + operator=New York
> State Department of Transortation (or whatever ap
28 matches
Mail list logo
