Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos repo moved: new server host

2025-07-01 Thread David Haslam
Hi Karl, There must be an explanation that neither of us know of (to date). Sent you a screenshot via Messenger. Could it be the fast search index was already created somewhere else? David Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 17:00, Karl Kleinpas

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos repo moved: new server host

2025-07-01 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
David Haslam wrote: > installed Persian Bible module FarFLB from the Xiphos repo toPocketSword- complete with the associated fast search index, and it all worked OK. That's a neat trick, because there is no fast search index for FarFLB in the repo. I don't know what you did, but Xiphos repo

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos repo moved: new server host

2025-07-01 Thread David Haslam
Thanks Karl, After a refresh, I successfully installed Persian Bible module FarFLB from the Xiphos repo toPocketSword- complete with the associated fast search index, and it all worked OK. NB. In general, for modules installed from the CrossWire & eBible.org repos, the associated search indice

Re: [sword-devel] [xiphos-users] Xiphos 4.3.1

2025-03-17 Thread garrisondaily
Thanks for all the work you all are putting into this, looking forward to updating! Sent from Proton Mail Android Original Message On 2025-03-17 8:56 a.m., Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > A fatal module manager bug was found for 1st-time users. > 4.3.0 release is retracted, 4.3.1 is

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.3.1

2025-03-17 Thread David Haslam
Installed! 😎 Best regards, David Sent with [Proton Mail](https://pr.tn/ref/SWXT9A5YZ67G) secure email. On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 12:56 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > A fatal module manager bug was found for 1st-time users. > 4.3.0 release is retracted, 4.3.1 is already in place.__

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.3.0

2025-03-16 Thread David Haslam
Thanks Karl & team, Successfully installed Xiphos (x64) in my Windows 11 laptop. Confirmed that installing a module to replace an earlier module no longer crashes Xiphos. Bravo!!! 😎 Best regards, David Sent with [Proton Mail](https://pr.tn/ref/SWXT9A5YZ67G) secure email. On Sunday, March 16

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos / SWORD / F34

2021-07-29 Thread Greg Hellings
Hurray! Glad to know it worked out. --Greg On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:53 AM Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > This morning I received my bright and shiny new SWORD and Xiphos updates > from the F34 repos. Thank you! > On 7/19/21 5:50 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > > Thanks! > > I've issued the rebuild com

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos / SWORD / F34

2021-07-29 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
This morning I received my bright and shiny new SWORD and Xiphos updates from the F34 repos.  Thank you! On 7/19/21 5:50 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > Thanks! > > I've issued the rebuild commands for both Xiphos and BibleTime in > Fedora and they've completed in F34. They should make their way into >

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos / SWORD / F34

2021-07-19 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Thank you so much, Greg!  I appreciate your maintenance of our fedora packages, among other things!  I hope normal life isn't too rude after an amazing honeymoon holiday! Troy On 7/19/21 5:50 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > Thanks! > > I've issued the rebuild commands for both Xiphos and BibleTime in

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos / SWORD / F34

2021-07-19 Thread Greg Hellings
Thanks! I've issued the rebuild commands for both Xiphos and BibleTime in Fedora and they've completed in F34. They should make their way into the updates-testing repositories in the next 24ish hours. After that they'll promote to the updates repo about 7 days later automatically (It can be faster

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos / SWORD / F34

2021-07-14 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Congratulations and enjoy your honeymoon! On July 14, 2021 7:13:19 PM GMT+02:00, Greg Hellings wrote: >Yes, this is captured in a Bugzilla that was automatically filed last >week >by Fedora automation. I goofed up when I packaged the Sword 1.9.0RCs >during >the Fedora 34 beta cycle (I misnamed t

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos / SWORD / F34

2021-07-14 Thread Greg Hellings
Yes, this is captured in a Bugzilla that was automatically filed last week by Fedora automation. I goofed up when I packaged the Sword 1.9.0RCs during the Fedora 34 beta cycle (I misnamed the RPM package so dnf sorted the RC as higher version than 1.9.0). I finally fixed that about a month ago, but

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos vs BibleTime

2021-02-12 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 2/12/21 5:09 PM, Don Elbourne wrote: > Forgive my ignorance, but what is the difference between Xiphos and > BibleTime? They represent different workflows around how one reads/studies the Bible. Neither is necessarily better than the other, but long ago I tried them both and found that Xiphos

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos repository down?

2020-05-11 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 5/10/20 11:27 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > DNS entries have been mangled, so inaccessible. Now fixed. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos repository down?

2020-05-10 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 5/10/20 10:41 AM, Tobias Klein wrote: > Xiphos repository seems to be down Not down.  DNS entries have been mangled, so inaccessible.  I'll contact Simon. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.2.1

2020-05-07 Thread Israel Dahl
On 5/7/20 4:23 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Israel Dahl wrote: >> Do you maintain the AUR build scripts for Arch? > I maintain the AUR builds for xiphos (and xiphos-git). 4.2.1 was > released there already. > Excellent!  Thanks, I will try later on Manjaro! >> And a

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.2.1

2020-05-07 Thread Caleb Maclennan
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Israel Dahl wrote: > Do you maintain the AUR build scripts for Arch? I maintain the AUR builds for xiphos (and xiphos-git). 4.2.1 was released there already. > And also do you think this will be able to get into Debian? I can't really speak to Debian. I think for

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.2.1

2020-05-07 Thread Israel Dahl
Do you maintain the AUR build scripts for Arch? And also do you think this will be able to get into Debian? Thanks for your work! On 5/7/20 10:24 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos/releases/tag/4.2.1 > > After a long dry spell, Xiphos is back with a new release. This

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.2.1

2020-05-07 Thread David Haslam
Thanks Karl. Well done everyone involved. Is there any guidance for Windows users who had previously installed the x86 edition of version 4.1.0 but would like to install the x64 edition as the update to version 4.2.1 ? Will running the install work smoothly in this situation or should I first

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos in Ubuntu

2020-05-04 Thread Fr Cyrille
Hi David, He's not speaking about the xiphos repo, but xiphos in the ubuntu official repo. Ubuntu 20.04 used the debian testing and xiphos was removed from testing because of an obsolete dependancy. Le 04/05/2020 à 20:59, David Haslam a écrit : > If it were down momentarily, it’s already back up.

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos in Ubuntu

2020-05-04 Thread David Haslam
If it were down momentarily, it’s already back up. David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 19:57, David Haslam wrote: > Why do you think it were removed rather than just being temporarily down ? > > It was OK yesterday. > > I expect Karl will have it back up in a jiffy. > > As

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos in Ubuntu

2020-05-04 Thread David Haslam
Why do you think it were removed rather than just being temporarily down ? It was OK yesterday. I expect Karl will have it back up in a jiffy. Aside: Some VPN services don’t allow FTP access to the Xiphos org repo, but that’s not today’s issue. AFAIK, you were asking only about the repo. Davi

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos in Ubuntu

2020-05-04 Thread Fr Cyrille
Le 04/05/2020 à 20:50, Israel Dahl a écrit : > Hi, > > Why was Xiphos removed from the repositories? Because we released to late... For now you can use my ppa for focal: https://launchpad.net/~lafricain79/+archive/ubuntu/lafricaintest Keep in touch with us, they probably offer the new release in

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos crashes with my sword locale

2019-11-05 Thread Cyrille
Le 05/11/2019 à 11:01, Karl Kleinpaste a écrit : > On 11/5/19 10:31 AM, Cyrille wrote: >> #6  0x71f9fca2 in __strcpy_chk (dest=0x57492190 "", >> src=0x566bed50 "ထွက်မြောက်ရာကျမ်း 1:1", destlen=50) >>     at strcpy_chk.c:30 > Bug found. A fix will happen for next release. That won'

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos crashes with my sword locale

2019-11-05 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 11/5/19 10:31 AM, Cyrille wrote: #6 0x71f9fca2 in __strcpy_chk (dest=0x57492190 "", src=0x566bed50 "ထွက်မြောက်ရာကျမ်း 1:1", destlen=50)     at strcpy_chk.c:30 Bug found. A fix will happen for next release. That won't be today or next week, but ... I'm thinking Christmas or th

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos crashes with my sword locale

2019-11-05 Thread Cyrille
Le 05/11/2019 à 10:22, Karl Kleinpaste a écrit : > On 11/5/19 10:20 AM, Cyrille wrote: >> But I don't know what means gdb. Let me know how to do. > http://ftp.xiphos.org/sword/debugging/backtrace Thread 1 "xiphos" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos crashes with my sword locale

2019-11-05 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 11/5/19 10:20 AM, Cyrille wrote: But I don't know what means gdb. Let me know how to do. http://ftp.xiphos.org/sword/debugging/backtrace ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel In

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos crashes with my sword locale

2019-11-05 Thread Cyrille
Le 05/11/2019 à 10:18, Karl Kleinpaste a écrit : > On 11/5/19 9:09 AM, Cyrille wrote: >> |*** buffer overflow detected ***: xiphos terminated| > It would help if you could run it under gdb to get a backtrace for > what function/line is the choke point. I'm ready to do everything! But I don't know

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos crashes with my sword locale

2019-11-05 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 11/5/19 9:09 AM, Cyrille wrote: |*** buffer overflow detected ***: xiphos terminated| It would help if you could run it under gdb to get a backtrace for what function/line is the choke point. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org h

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-14 Thread Michael Johnson
Thank you for the clarification! Now if we could just get a more recent Sword engine into distribution on Ubuntu, that would be nice... On 06/13/2018 12:56 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 06/13/2018 06:49 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >> Xiphos' MinimumVersion support was added Aug 2017, released in

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-14 Thread Michael Johnson
Thank you, Michael. Sorry I didn't act on your prior email. I get way too much email to properly deal with it all. Anyway, since front end developers are so slow to upgrade their sword engine use, I downgraded my module generation to specify a minimum sword version of 1.7.0. The downside of this

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 06/13/2018 06:49 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Xiphos' MinimumVersion support was added Aug 2017, released in 4.0.7, > Sep 2017. BTW, this explains the variability of success from testing: Xiphos 4.1.0 1.8.1 Windows 10 PASS Xiphos 4.0.7 1.7.3

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 06/13/2018 06:38 PM, Michael H wrote: > Xiphos and Bibletime are properly testing the module minimum > requirements against the sword engine Xiphos' MinimumVersion support was added Aug 2017, released in 4.0.7, Sep 2017. ___ sword-devel mailing list: s

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Michael H
Kahunapule, I sent you an email about this about 9 months ago: The issue might be that all of the modules on ebible.org have a minimum requirement for sword 1.7.4 in place, regardless of actual module content vs. sword engine capabilities. (I did not validate ALL, but I have tested ~20 or so modu

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Gary Holmlund
    I will add this case: Bibletime         2.11.1         1.8.1         Ubuntu 18.04         PASS Bibletime         2.11.1         1.7.3         Ubuntu 18.04         Fails The pattern seems to be Sword 1.81 pass, Sword 1.7.3 fail. Based on how BibleTim

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Michael Johnson
Thank you, Pierre. The two installmgr commands you suggested worked on Ubuntu 18.04. Xiphos still failed. On 06/13/2018 08:47 AM, pierre amadio wrote: > Hi there ! > > I do not have a Ubuntu 18.04 ready to try out, but you should be able to > check wether the problem is within the sword library

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread pierre amadio
Hi there ! I do not have a Ubuntu 18.04 ready to try out, but you should be able to check wether the problem is within the sword library itself by trying to perform the same task with installmgr. installmgr -r eBible.org installmgr -ri eBible.org fraLSG1910eb If this did not work, double check i

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Michael Johnson
I'm looking for a pattern in what works and what doesn't. Here is the test: install a Bible unique to eBible.org. Front end version Sword version OS Result Xiphos 4.1.0 1.8.1 Windows 10 PASS Xiphos 4.0.7 1.7.3

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-13 Thread Robert Hunt
Seems I can't get either http nor ftp eBible repository on Xiphos 4.07 on Ubuntu Bionic. Robert. On 13/06/18 15:36, Michael Johnson wrote: Yes, I refreshed the standard list of sources and manually refreshed eBible.org. I got a blank list. On 06/12/2018 05:14 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: Did y

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-12 Thread David Haslam
It's still working for me with Xiphos 4.1.0 for Windows. David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 04:36, Michael Johnson wrote: > Yes, I refreshed the standard list of sources and manually refreshed > eBible.org. I got a blank list. On 06/12/2018 05:14 PM, Greg Hellings wrote

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-12 Thread Michael Johnson
Yes, I refreshed the standard list of sources and manually refreshed eBible.org. I got a blank list. On 06/12/2018 05:14 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > Did you go through the normal path of refreshing the standard list of sources? > > --Greg > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:03 PM Kahunapule Michael Joh

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-12 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 06/12/2018 11:01 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: > Is there anything I can do about it, or is this something that needs to be > fixed in Xiphos? I just refreshed eBible in Xiphos without incident. It appears in 2 configurations in my Installmgr.conf; both work for me: FTPSource=eBible.o

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos not seeing eBible.org repository?

2018-06-12 Thread Greg Hellings
Did you go through the normal path of refreshing the standard list of sources? --Greg On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:03 PM Kahunapule Michael Johnson < kahunap...@ebible.org> wrote: > I just set up a new Linux (Ubuntu Bionic Beaver) system for someone, > including an install of Xiphos. When trying t

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.1.0

2018-04-19 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 04/18/2018 10:34 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > #829, below, is not windows only. it occurs on LInux, too, In, at least, > the epel build for RHEL/Centos. > So I did a local build and the problem remains. Not if you built out of the 4.1.0 tarball, or have updated with git pull. The relevant commits are

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.1.0

2018-04-18 Thread Fred Smith
#829, below, is not windows only. it occurs on LInux, too, In, at least, the epel build for RHEL/Centos. So I did a local build and the problem remains. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:55:49PM -0400, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >A bit late from original plan, but here it is. >4.1.x is expected to be

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-10-14 Thread David Haslam
Not long afterwards, I added an issue in the Xiphos github repo. https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos/issues/826 David -- Sent from: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/ ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.o

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-27 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Y'know, there are mailing lists for Xiphos. They're even hosted here on crosswire.org these days. On 09/27/2017 12:32 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Is there anything critical in that list of errors? Nope. Tell it to the GTK folks who can't manufacture sensible, self-consistent GTK themes; those aren't

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-27 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote: >It's been a minute (4.0.4) since I shipped an EPEL build. But I just >put one together for EPEL7. Please, please, please test it once it hits >the updates-testing repo at the next compose (ideally that should be >tomorr

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-27 Thread David Haslam
Clarification - further evidence. I was able to install a new module from eBible.org Xiphos closed ONLY when I selected a module under Updates and attempted to install that. After the crash, the Xiphos MM no longer listed the same module under Updates even after a further refresh. Moreover, ther

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-27 Thread David Haslam
Just tried installing a module from the eBible.org repository. Repository refresh worked fine. Xiphos 4.0.7 (Win32) just closed (crashed?) during attempt to install module. No progress bar movements prior to the crash. The behaviour is repeatable. Installing one from CrossWire Main worked OK. Is

Re: [sword-devel] [xiphos-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-27 Thread Daniel Glassey
FYI "Unit 193" already got it into Debian unstable. https://packages.debian.org/sid/xiphos The Ubuntu ppa https://launchpad.net/~pkgcrosswire/+archive/ubuntu/ppa is way out of date, so if anyone wants to help get the package there they would be welcome. And someone may get it into Debian backports

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-26 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote: >It's been a minute (4.0.4) since I shipped an EPEL build. But I just >put one together for EPEL7. Please, please, please test it once it hits >the updates-testing repo at the next compose (ideally that should be >tomorr

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-25 Thread Greg Hellings
It's been a minute (4.0.4) since I shipped an EPEL build. But I just put one together for EPEL7. Please, please, please test it once it hits the updates-testing repo at the next compose (ideally that should be tomorrow, but it could be anytime in the next few days) and let me know if I've horribly

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-25 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:03:26PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote: >Builds for Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 27 (currently in alpha) and Fedora 26 >are currently underway. They'll filter into their respective repos over >the next 0 to 7 days, depending on the QE cycle for your particular >rele

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-25 Thread Greg Hellings
Builds for Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 27 (currently in alpha) and Fedora 26 are currently underway. They'll filter into their respective repos over the next 0 to 7 days, depending on the QE cycle for your particular release. --Greg On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:20 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Installed th

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.7

2017-09-25 Thread David Haslam
Installed the x64 edition in Windows 7 this morning. Not had time to use it yet. Updated the Xiphos page in the SWORD developers' wiki. David -- Sent from: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/ ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.or

Re: [sword-devel] xiphos repo down for the day

2017-09-08 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 09/08/2017 07:13 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: > You could host it on Amazon S3 as HTTP/HTTPS only for pennies a month Or I could recycle another old box for $0. The now-failed hardware lasted 12 years. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.or

Re: [sword-devel] xiphos repo down for the day

2017-09-08 Thread Greg Hellings
You could host it on Amazon S3 as HTTP/HTTPS only for pennies a month On Sep 8, 2017 05:58, "Karl Kleinpaste" wrote: > FYI the host personifying ftp.xiphos.org failed last night. > I should have a solution in place this evening. > > ___ > sword-devel m

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.6

2017-08-11 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 08/11/2017 09:43 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Are there any special instructions for installing the x64 edition, for a > Windows user that had previously installed the x32 edition? It's some sort of stupid glitch in the NSIS file that I've never figured out. It insists on going to the wrong direc

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.6

2017-08-11 Thread David Haslam
Thanks, Karl. In the Windows edition, for Xiphos 4.0.6 Help About, the copyright date range still ends with 2016. You may wish to fix this. (It was still like this in 4.0.5 - though I forgot to report it when I first noticed.) btw. I might help users if the Help About also indicated whether the

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.6

2017-08-11 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
BTW... I had a couple reports of Xiphos under Win10 crashing in the previous release, both 32- and 64-bit builds. I am unable to reproduce this. I have Win10 on my desk at work and on my woman's laptop, and Win7 in a VBox VM, and have no trouble with Xiphos on any of these. If you see such a fai

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.5

2017-04-24 Thread David Haslam
It's indirect, in that the Xiphos help options include a link to the Manual, and the Manual has links to the gnomesword-users list. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Xiphos-4-0-5-tp4657084p4657097.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at N

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.5

2017-04-24 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 04/24/2017 05:26 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Is that still being used since you moved to GitHub? I can't find gnomesword-users anywhere in my Xiphos tree. Tell me where you see it. > The Manual is seven years old, and there's not been any update forthcoming > from the "Xiphos Team" since No,

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.5

2017-04-24 Thread David Haslam
This is just a friendly observation, not a complaint. A "first-time user" might be confused by the fact that the *Xiphos Help* is so old that it still points users to get online help from gnomesword-us...@lists.sourceforge.net Is that still being used since you moved to GitHub? The Manual is s

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.5

2017-04-24 Thread David Haslam
Hi Karl, The splash screen still sports "Copyright © 2000-2016 Xiphos Development Team" Suggest update it to read "Copyright © 2000-2017 Xiphos Development Team" Blessings, David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Xiphos-4-0-5-tp4657084p4657090.html Sent

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.5

2017-04-24 Thread David Haslam
Hi Karl, New release recorded in https://crosswire.org/wiki/Frontends:Xiphos#Release_history What's the reason to /recommend/ the *x32 edition* for users who (like me) have Windows 7 x64 ? Have you had any useful feedback from users of the x64 edition? Does not the recommendation itself foresta

Re: [sword-devel] [xiphos-devel] Xiphos 4.0.5

2017-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
Versions of Xiphos have been built into the standard repositories for Rawhide, Fedora 26 (current alpha - will be available in 3 days in updates), and Fedora 25 (current stable - will be available in 7 days in updates). --Greg On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > An act of

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos development and mailing list changes

2016-01-25 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2016-01-25, 15:22 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > The code base will be auto-imported from SF; at the moment, > the repo at https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos is empty and > will stay that way until I collect a bunch of new GitHub names > so that the import can "credit" past commits properly.

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos development and mailing list changes

2016-01-25 Thread David Haslam
I hope all goes well for the move, Karl. I'm sure it's the right thing to do, even if as one aging volunteer, I'm not yet up to speed. At least I do already have a registered account on GitHub. https://github.com/DavidHaslam Nothing there to see yet - that would interest coders. btw. The profile

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos http server down

2016-01-15 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Yeah, tell it to Comcast, who have been ditching service in this area on and off for 3 days. I hope it'll be back again in a couple hours. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instr

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-12-16 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-12-16, 20:22 GMT, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Hi guys. How were the modules installed? Where are they installed? > Are the data files readable by the user running these commands? 1) Checked for all material installed in $HOME and removed it (including ~/.sword). 2) $ installmgr -init

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-12-16 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Hi guys. How were the modules installed? Where are they installed? Are the data files readable by the user running these commands? On 12/16/2015 11:58 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2015-12-10, 13:59 GMT, Mark Trompell wrote: >> 2015-12-10 10:10 GMT+01:00 Matěj Cepl : >>> On 2015-10-29, 11:58 GMT, K

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-12-16 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-12-10, 13:59 GMT, Mark Trompell wrote: > 2015-12-10 10:10 GMT+01:00 Matěj Cepl : >> On 2015-10-29, 11:58 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >>> On 10/19/2015 06:36 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: could anybody suggest why xiphos shows me just blank pages >>> I just came back to this after watching your

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-12-11 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-12-10, 13:59 GMT, Mark Trompell wrote: > Did you try with a fresh ~/.xiphos? Now, I did. No change. Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC Two things fill the heart with renewed and increasing aw

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-12-10 Thread Mark Trompell
2015-12-10 10:10 GMT+01:00 Matěj Cepl : > On 2015-10-29, 11:58 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >> On 10/19/2015 06:36 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> could anybody suggest why xiphos shows me just blank pages >> I just came back to this after watching your video when you first sent >> this last week. I have

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-12-10 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-10-29, 11:58 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 10/19/2015 06:36 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> could anybody suggest why xiphos shows me just blank pages > I just came back to this after watching your video when you first sent > this last week. I have no explanation, but do you get the same behav

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos, blank pages

2015-10-29 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 10/19/2015 06:36 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > could anybody suggest why xiphos shows me just blank pages I just came back to this after watching your video when you first sent this last week. I have no explanation, but do you get the same behavior out of BT, for example? My only guess is some kind

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos remote source down?

2015-09-29 Thread Teus Benschop
It works from this side - thanks! > > ftp.xiphos.org's DNS has been updated, so the repo is visible again. And > it is busy. > > ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos remote source down?

2015-09-29 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 09/23/2015 05:23 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > a request to replace the old A RR with a CNAME RR ftp.xiphos.org's DNS has been updated, so the repo is visible again. And it is busy. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.cros

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos remote source down?

2015-09-23 Thread Teus Benschop
Thanks for the fix! ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos remote source down?

2015-09-23 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
The remote VPN endpoint that has provided my home server's (as ftp.xiphos.org's) external visibility for roughly 2 decades completely failed last weekend. It was finally determined yesterday that that node will not come back. So I worked out the necessary dynamic DNS and other matters needed so t

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.4

2015-08-30 Thread David Haslam
Thanks Karl, Installed successfully in my Win7 x64 PC. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Xiphos-4-0-4-tp4655136p4655138.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mail

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3 & eBible.org repository

2015-08-18 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
I found the problem with anonymous ftp with user name ftp being randomly disabled. It is because Plesk thinks it is smarter than me, and undoes my configuration changes whenever it regenerates configuration files from its database, but it doesn't give me a way to

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-18 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-17, 21:41 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 08/17/2015 04:44 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> I still don’t know what's the advantage of lying about the API version. > I suppose it's a small example of a much larger problem. If GTK3 is > updated from 3.14.15 to 3.14.16, we shouldn't induce a reb

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-18 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-17, 21:17 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote: > The point is that, if we build against 1.1.2 (the way we used to build > against 1.7.1 of SWORD, etc) then we are forced to execute a rebuild > of the Xiphos and all other downstream packages just because the > filename changes to 1.1.3 later on. Eve

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 08/17/2015 04:44 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > I still don’t know what's the advantage of lying about the API version. I suppose it's a small example of a much larger problem. If GTK3 is updated from 3.14.15 to 3.14.16, we shouldn't induce a rebuild of all GTK3 applications. Current /usr/lib64/libgt

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Greg Hellings
The point is that, if we build against 1.1.2 (the way we used to build against 1.7.1 of SWORD, etc) then we are forced to execute a rebuild of the Xiphos and all other downstream packages just because the filename changes to 1.1.3 later on. Even though 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 are API/ABI compatible. By exp

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-17, 19:10 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > I pulled down the official (i.e. Greg's) BibleSync packages from Fedora > repos to look inside them. His packages contain .so.1.1, not > .so.1.1.2. Perhaps Greg did the soversion thing? But in the name of > consistency, then, a Xiphos built agai

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-17, 18:18 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote: > Are you certain that you're calling up the xiphos that came from my > packages? My biblesync build script never generates a > biblesync.so.1.1.2 at all, so there should be no way for the Xiphos > package to be created while referencing it. If the bib

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
I pulled down the official (i.e. Greg's) BibleSync packages from Fedora repos to look inside them. His packages contain .so.1.1, not .so.1.1.2. Perhaps Greg did the soversion thing? But in the name of consistency, then, a Xiphos built against that BibleSync package should link fine using just .s

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Greg Hellings
Matej, Are you certain that you're calling up the xiphos that came from my packages? My biblesync build script never generates a biblesync.so.1.1.2 at all, so there should be no way for the Xiphos package to be created while referencing it. If the biblesync spec file was generating a library file

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-17, 13:00 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > I can't offer any guess, being not involved in Redhat repo management. > My builds use a spec that started as mostly Greg's. Your version lacks > Greg's -fPIC additions from several months ago (F22 got uptight about > security in some new, weird s

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 08/17/2015 12:42 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > I didn’t build it, it was downloaded from the official EPEL repo. Sorry, my mistake, I thought you were experimenting with the build process for it as well. > Why in the world, we define that __soversion macro? I have never > in my life with SPEC files (

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-16, 23:07 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 08/16/2015 05:55 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> Shouldn’t that library be /usr/lib64/libbiblesync.so.1.1.2 ? > Absolutely. Did you update biblesync.spec appropriately when it was > built, and did you build it from the right .tar.gz in the first place

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Brian Schroeder
Thanks Karl. All works now. Karl Kleinpaste wrote: On 08/16/2015 07:52 PM, Brian Schroeder wrote: Is their something wrong with the eBible site at the moment? If you set it upin mod.mgr for FTP usage, the problem is that anon FTP has been disabled at this time. I don't know why. $ ftp ftp.

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 08/16/2015 07:52 PM, Brian Schroeder wrote: > Is their something wrong with the eBible site at the moment? If you set it upin mod.mgr for FTP usage, the problem is that anon FTP has been disabled at this time. I don't know why. $ ftp ftp.ebible.org Connected to ftp.ebible.org (74.208.71.128).

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Brian Schroeder
I have just built Xiphos 4.0.3 rpms on Mageia 5, and installed the gtk3 version. It all seems to work normally. However I am not able to see any modules in the eBible repository. I added it in in the module manager and refreshed. The refresh seemed to run too quickly, and then no modules sho

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 08/16/2015 05:55 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Shouldn’t that library be /usr/lib64/libbiblesync.so.1.1.2 ? Absolutely. Did you update biblesync.spec appropriately when it was built, and did you build it from the right .tar.gz in the first place? ___ sword-

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-16, 17:56 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >> xiphos: error while loading shared libraries: libbiblesync.so.1.1.2: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > How can you have installed biblesync and biblesync-devel without getting > their files in place? matej@mitmanek:

Re: [sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

2015-08-16 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 08/16/2015 01:43 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > What's wrong with me? Shouldn't > distro-sync be enough? It seems to me that some package is > missing proper Requires. Um... > xiphos: error while loading shared libraries: libbiblesync.so.1.1.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo

  1   2   3   >