On 2015-08-17, 19:10 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > I pulled down the official (i.e. Greg's) BibleSync packages from Fedora > repos to look inside them. His packages contain .so.1.1, not > .so.1.1.2. Perhaps Greg did the soversion thing? But in the name of > consistency, then, a Xiphos built against that BibleSync package should > link fine using just .so.1.1.
Package biblesync-1.1.2-3.el7 (from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/biblesync/1.1.2/3.el7/x86_64/biblesync-1.1.2-3.el7.x86_64.rpm ) contains actually code of 1.1.2 but with the fake SOVERSION set to 1.1. I really don’t get what’t the point. Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC If you are not paying for it, you're not the customer; you're the product being sold. -- blue_beetle (2010-08-26) http://www.metafilter.com/95152/Userdriven-discontent#3256046 _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
