Here is a bit more info about the bug #1. If the Description field is
changed to contain Thai utf-8 characters, the opposite effect is
displayed. In the two locations, it displays garbled and in the third it
is fine.
Adrian Korten wrote:
> g'day,
>
> We are getting an update ready to a Thai Cros
Jeremy's question was specific to an instance in which PrAzar is
embedded within Dan 3, such that they have repeating verse numbers.
Your comments address mapping between different versifications schemes,
which, as Troy has pointed out, isn't even in the planning stage
yet--and likely won't be
g'day,
We are getting an update ready to a Thai CrossWire distribution CD. In
making some localization changes for Thai, a few bugs have been
discovered. Both of them are in the Sword CS search window. I'm not sure
where at the moment to report bugs (wiki or bug report site) so I'll
list them here
Your implementation is simple enough, but it requires that people
reference the verse as being part of the Prayer of Azariah, verse 2 or
verse 8 or so on. In all of the print copies I've seen of the book of
Daniel that include the Prayer of Azariah, the verses of the prayer
simply part of the vers
Another small task that will need to be done before we can release any
Bibles using the planned dynamic versification scheme is the
implementation of a zGenBook class. We have zVerse, the compressed
version of RawVerse, and zLD, the compressed version of RawLD. But we
will need a compressed ver
RawGenBook can hold out-of-order IDs without issue. So if a Bible puts
Daniel 3:4 before 3:3--or even Daniel 4 before Daniel 3--that's no
issue. The module maintains its own data ordering, unlike VerseKey
modules, which use a static ordering.
But it definitely can't handle multiple instances of
On 3/12/07, Jeremy Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I thought of regarding the indexing for a RawGenBook that is
> being talked about, and using a book/chapter/verse keying scheme. I don't
> know if this is a problem, but I have seen at least one version that used
> the some verse numb
One thing I thought of regarding the indexing for a RawGenBook that is
being talked about, and using a book/chapter/verse keying scheme. I don't
know if this is a problem, but I have seen at least one version that used
the some verse numbers twice in the same chapter. In a Croatian
translation of
"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Resolving issues into specific other modules is also a portion of code
> that has been much talked about, but needs to be resolved in parallel
> with this
For the record, GnomeSword handles this in (what can be) a general
way: GS handles "sword://" URL
DJ Ortley wrote:
> First, I'd like to make a correction to a question I asked:
> *Also, one last question out of curiosity, are references to the NKJV
> made because, aside from the non-Protestant books, its of the same
> versification as the KJV?*
>
> I meant NRSV(A?) not NKJV.
NRSVA is the
My apologies for not simply stating the direction in my previous emails.
'reversification' or conversion between versification schemes is not
even on the radar. We have talked in depth about this on the osis-core
list and in sword-devel as well. It is not being addressed for the work
currentl
> With all of these questions, possibilities and alternatives, perhaps
> it would help if you were to write up some sort of formal
> specification or even a Design Document for the code as you see it.
> Even something as basic as an outlined header file including just the
> interface methods and so
Resolving issues into specific other modules is also a portion of code
that has been much talked about, but needs to be resolved in parallel
with this, in my opinion, Karl. Just between those two changes we're
talking about a major change to the library and its interfaces. Seems
to me that some s
"DJ Ortley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Though that does bring up a point. What about documents that specifically
> use another versification scheme other than the KJV scheme?
To complicate matters, consider commentaries containing references by
multiple schemes within a single document, e.g. N
First, I'd like to make a correction to a question I asked:
*Also, one last question out of curiosity, are references to the NKJV made
because, aside from the non-Protestant books, its of the same versification
as the KJV?*
I meant NRSV(A?) not NKJV.
With the question Jeremy posted abouve Verse
Troy,
With all of these questions, possibilities and alternatives, perhaps
it would help if you were to write up some sort of formal
specification or even a Design Document for the code as you see it.
Even something as basic as an outlined header file including just the
interface methods and some
Do you have a plan for naming the SIL Bibles yet? Maybe the language code
from the Ethnologue (www.ethnologue.org) (ISO 639-3) plus the year of
publication?
If something like this was done for all languages (i.e. including English,
French, etc.) Sword apps could present users the versions they ha
sword-devel@crosswire.org on Sunday, March 11, 2007 at 11:00 AM -0800
wrote:
>> which is currently imported as a SWORD General Book (General Books use
>a
>> TreeKey index, as you can see from the left navigation) and to make it
>> accessible via a new specialized VerseKey descendant (VerseKey is
Jonathon Blake wrote:
> Will the all of books listed in
> http://crosswire.org/study/bookdisplay.jsp?mod=LXXM&gbsEntry=%2FPsSol%2F18%2F1#cv
> on the side be part of the new versification format?
The idea is that the first level of the index will be the book name, the
second level will be the c
I have a few questions (that are born more out of ignorance than anything
else..like most of my thoughts.)
Is the idea that is being talked about to create a new VerseKey that takes
an input that is assumed to be the versification of a KJV verse and
translate that to what's appropriate for any mo
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> I got it running and building but when I start the new BibleCS it
> complains that it (or SWMgr) cannot find mods.d or mods.conf. I set
> SWORD_PATH to existing Sword installation, but with no success.
OK, I got it working. I edited the there. Thanks f
I think that BibleCS requires either a sword.conf file in the
directory it's running from or that it be in the same directory as (or
one directory below) the mods.d and mods.conf file. That is.. I think
that is the case. Try it from the directory where you've installed
the Sword Project.
--Greg
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Also added a README.txt to explain how to checkout and compile.
>
> http://crosswire.org/svn/biblecs/trunk/README.txt
I got it running and building but when I start the new BibleCS it
complains that it (or SWMgr) cannot find mods.d or mods.conf. I se
Joachim Ansorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2. Under CygWin, src/utilfuns/swobject.cpp needs in order
>> to compile, due to the presence of the nonstandard stricmp(); CygWin
>> string.h re-#defines it to the standard strcasecmp(). Or perhaps use
>> swbuf.h instead, since it brings in string.h.
24 matches
Mail list logo
