hanie Bertet et al.
More interestingly for us, of course, was that you can get 3rd order
localization from 1st order material with the harpex decoder. But no decoder
can make meaningful 3D material from a horizontal source. So if I had to
choose between 3rd order horizontal and 1st order 3D, I would c
2011/5/1 Richard Dobson
> On 01/05/2011 12:50, Svein Berge wrote:
> ..
>
>
>>> Another anecdotal answer, which doesn't even quite address the question:
>> The
>> difference between 1st order horizontal and 3rd order horizontal is easy
>> to
>>
2011/5/1 Fons Adriaensen
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 01:50:22PM +0200, Svein Berge wrote:
> > More interestingly for us, of course, was that you can get 3rd order
> > localization from 1st order material with the harpex decoder.
>
>
I'd like to take with some grains of
Thanks John!
There is also a new version of the player out today. It also contains some
features requested here on sursound:
Reduced CPU usage.
Per-channel delay, allowing for improved surround decoding with more stable
frontal localization and distance compensation in irregular arrays.
Option f
Hello all,
Since I've been named I guess a quick comment might be in order. Of course,
Dave is correct about the potential for artifacts of bss algorithms and that
means that a single first-order b-format stream is sufficient for all uses,
even with upsampling and whatnot. More channels are req
> is sufficient for all uses
that was supposed to read… "is not sufficient for all uses"…
Svein
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Here's a quick and dirty directivity measurement I did on an
unmodified H2:
http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~sveinb/sfcalib/zoom-h2.html
It's not left-right symmetrical, which might indicate a measurement
problem. The ideal conversion matrix (ignoring the measurements, just
assuming ideal, as-speci
2011/1/24 Daniel Courville
> Le 11-01-24 10:23, Andrew Levine a écrit :
>
> >I imagine it would require quite a complex piece of software that could
> >differentiate sound sources by grouping their spectral components,
> >reconstruct the original positions and then recreate a LCR-soundstage.
>
>
;t think there
are any with native RTAS or TDM support. However, you can try to wrap
one of Daniel Courville's excellent VST plugins with FXpansion's VST
to RTAS adapter.
Best,
Svein Berge
harpex.net
On 23. feb.. 2011, at 23:27, Chris Cody wrote:
G'day guys,
Does any
Hello!
Hold your horses. There will be news coming out next week! (I'm trying
to implement a press strategy here... :-)
Svein
On 24. mars. 2011, at 15:02, Andrew Levine wrote:
Hi Svein,
don't you want to announce something on this list? ;-)
Regards,
Andrew
_
Okay, so about the exciting news...
As most of you know by now, I've been working on this plugin for a
while - with a lot of help from Natasha Barrett, NOTAM and the beta
testers, a big thanks to them and to Andrew who's taken on the job of
an evangelist!
Today, the plugin is finally rele
ogue and almost as much as the
full Max/MSP/Jitter package, all of which have far more
functionality and represent much higher investments in development
time and resources. Fair enough (I suppose) for people who can
afford to shell out for Protools - but for anyone else???
On 31/03/2011 17
On 1. april. 2011, at 13:08, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
They priced the software based on a similar model to yours (and
insisted on me developing a dongle which put up the costs even
further) against the advice of those of us in the business (so to
speak). The result - way lower sales
That makes sense.
Svein
On 1. april. 2011, at 12:45, John Leonard wrote:
Perhaps one answer to this is to offer academic pricing? This is
what Soundfield does with the main SurroundZone plug-in, as far as I
remember.
Best wishes,
John
On 1 Apr 2011, at 05:37, Svein Berge wrote:
I
http://harpex.net/download.html
On 1. april. 2011, at 17:26, Danny McCarty wrote:
Could you post the link again please?
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
7;m
> more interested in Ambisonic mixing than SFM applications, but as a decoder
> this should be quite useful.
>
For B-format I am only aware of two previous plugin prices: 0 and GBP 495.
Dave
>
>> On 1. april. 2011, at 12:45, John Leonard wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps one an
2011/4/2 Fons Adriaensen
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Svein Berge wrote:
>
> > Fons has previously asked for a jack-enabled stand-alone application
> instead.
>
> No, I have not. I asked *if* it would output via Jack. Or if it would work
> with the 24..64
2011/4/2 Marc Lavallée
> Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:38:50 +0200,
> Svein Berge wrote :
>
> > > My personalized demo works in Linux with jackd when using the
> > > dssi-vst host. And it works very well.
> > >
> > >
> > Congrats! I tried to compile vst/
h spans a bit wider than the title suggests:
"A New Method for B-format to Binaural Transcoding", Svein Berge, Natasha
Barrett (2010) <http://harpex.net/aes40-free.pdf>
Svein
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL
Hello,
I have my suspicions about what causes this. Hopefully, I can solve it at
the same time I implement Dave's channel routing for the next version.
Svein
2011/4/5 Enrique Tomas
> Hello,
> I wanted to ask you if you managed well for routing the output channels of
> Harpex Player to the mixe
stems in that it has height - at least, without
buying more speakers!
Dave
On 06/04/2011 08:26, Svein Berge wrote:
Hello,
I have my suspicions about what causes this. Hopefully, I can solve
it at
the same time I implement Dave's channel routing for the next
version.
Svein
2011/
I'd be very interested in hearing what people think about this too. I
should point out that I haven't gone quite as far as to say that
Harpex will turn a TetraMic into a 3rd order microphone. What we've
stated in our papers is that in two sets of formal listening tests,
Harpex scores equall
22 matches
Mail list logo
