Hello Jörn,
brilliant, thanks so much for your answer.
As far as I understand the Tetramic has TA3 and TA6 connectors (AKA mimi
XLR) which I use on a daily basis with my SD552 and 788T with no problem.
What is the problem you encoutered with them?
Also they claim to sound as good as a DPA mic,
> In that case for my ambiences and nature recordings unfortunately it
> will give me so issues to work with.
>
Don't think there is _an_ answer for nature recording, though be glad to
be proved wrong.
Fons' TetraMic+Parabola interests me greatly ... though obviously the
output is not periphonic
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 04:56:49PM +, Paul Hodges wrote:
> 1 ground
> 2 power
> 3 W+, X-, Y-
> 4 W-, X+, Y-
> 5 W-, X-, Y+
>
> then
>
> W is (3, 0.5(4+5))
> X is (4, 0.5(3+5))
> Y is (5, 0.5(3+4))
>
> That's better; things cancel out properly that way.
Shouldn't that be
W is (3, 0.5 (4,
J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 03:31 PM, Eero Aro wrote:
...
>> Just by the accident, I visited an Audio-Visual Fair in the Helsinki
>> Fair Centre this afternoon and had a chat with Martin, who has
>> designed the microphone.
>>
>> I actually held the microphone in my hand. There was
David Cindric wrote:
I am wondering if there is some software with wich I could determine sound
direction from tetra mic (4-channel) recordings.
Have a look at IRIS, from Marshall Day Acoustics Ltd.:
http://www.iris.co.nz
Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com)
Core Sound LLC
www.core-s
Eero did not hold a prototype.
I did hold a prototype several years ago.
I'm a little bit surprised that the type of a connector is the most
important
thing that raises discussion about a new B-format microphone in Sursound.
The easiest way to get information is to contact Martin directly:
h
Ok
Now that I look at the not-so-good-resolution photo on Martin's
page, I can see that it is 6 pins.
6-pin XLR:s have been used for "dual channel intercom systems and stage
lighting control applications"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XLR_connector#Six_pin
I must get new reading glasses. Doh!
Eero Aro skrev 15.11.2013 19:46:
Now that I look at the not-so-good-resolution photo on Martin's
page, I can see that it is 6 pins.
The proto was indeed 6-pin, but the production model is 5-pin XLR, so
Eero was correct.
Martin
___
Sursound ma
Good.
I'm saving money, as I don't need the new glasses after all.
:-)
Eero
Martin Kantola wrote:
Eero Aro skrev 15.11.2013 19:46:
Now that I look at the not-so-good-resolution photo on Martin's
page, I can see that it is 6 pins.
The proto was indeed 6-pin, but the production model is 5-pi
J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
the tetra sounds great, but the connectors are very flimsy.
The connectors are all from Switchcraft's Tini-Q (mini-XLR) series, used in
many professional products and contexts.
In the six years since TetraMic was introduced, we've had exactly one cable
returned
David,
I've also got an ambisonic visualizer plugin developed but not published
. Aside from the kind of interface cleanup it would need for public
release, it uses what I eventually realized is a horribly inefficient
algorithm. I've mostly built it for my own testing purposes - to see
what
english. :)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131115/6fe7461d/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
Marc Lavallée wrote:
In my experience, the order of channels in jack are stable enough to
use this simple channels remapping trick:
mplayer -channels 4 -af channels=4:4:0:0:1:3:2:1:3:2 -ao
jack:port=ambdec AJH_eight-positions.amb
FWIW, while looking at mplayer code it occured to me that -
1.
> J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
>> the tetra sounds great, but the connectors are very flimsy.
>
> The connectors are all from Switchcraft's Tini-Q (mini-XLR) series, used
> in
> many professional products and contexts.
>
> In the six years since TetraMic was introduced, we've had exactly one
> cab
14 matches
Mail list logo
