I'd heard whispers that Dolby had a "big announcement" on the way - well, here
it is
http://www.dolby.com/gb/en/professional/technology/cinema/dolby-atmos.html#Versatile_Solution
--
These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer
/
Ok, had a bit of time to read the (somewhat limited) technical document and it appears that it is
basically component audio + background soundscapes (aka "beds"), with final render done in the
theatre by panning the individual audio objects according to the sound trajectories defined in the
mixi
Le 12-04-20 14:54, Jan Jacob Hofmann a écrit :
>I was pointed to a device, which is able to play audio-files of up to
>16 channels without the need of a computer as a stand-alone device. It
>is basically a SD-card player and I wonder, if this might be
>interesting for some on this list.
Here's so
The Raspberry PI is really cheap and runs Linux, so it does provide some real possibilities, though
it is, in some ways, quite limited - max 256m ram at present, for instance - and documentation is
currently not really in a "this is how you do it" state
(http://www.element14.com/community/docs/
Dave Malham wrote:
> The Raspberry PI is really cheap and runs Linux, so it does provide some
> real possibilities, though
> it is, in some ways, quite limited - max 256m ram at present, for instance -
...
> it seems that the SPI pins are available on a standard header so shouldn't
> be too diffi
Dave Malham wrote:
Ok, had a bit of time to read the (somewhat limited) technical
document and it appears that it is basically component audio +
background soundscapes (aka "beds"), with final render done in the
theatre by panning the individual audio objects according to the sound
trajectori
On 24 Apr 2012, at 19:08, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
> (Or: surround is < maybe > not dead if you cram 3 matrixed channels into 2
> channels of Apple- compressed AAC iTunes files - which is actually a worse
> solution than we already had in the 80s. :-D )
I do appreciate polemic, as long as it st
The snd_bcm2835 driver is for the integrated stereo sound module.
For more channels, a cheap 8 channels USB sound module would probably
work, and ALSA drivers for many sound modules are stable.
Martin Leese a écrit :
> Dave Malham wrote:
>
> > The Raspberry PI is really cheap and runs Linux,
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 24 Apr 2012, at 19:08, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
(Or: surround is < maybe > not dead if you cram 3 matrixed channels into 2
channels of Apple- compressed AAC iTunes files - which is actually a worse solution
than we already had in the 80s. :-D )
I do app
I probably should add this:
http://smyth-research.com/
They could update their system to 3D audio.
TU-1 head tracker
Included with Realiser; also available separately for dual users,
replacement, etc. (A single set-top unit is sufficient for dual users.)
$175
Could be cheaper for a CE
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
> You also seem to think that 16 bits are enough FAPP, but orchestra
> recordings have often more than 96dB dynamic range. I know that you can
> hear under the noise floor. But then, you probably will hear also some
> noise?
On 04/11/2012 08:01 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
Hi *!
On behalf of the conference organizers, we would like to invite you to
join the Linux Audio Conference 2012, kindly hosted by the Center for
Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) at Stanford University.
The conference will star
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:27:43PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> the more delicate souls among you might want to ignore the ambisonic
> papers lest you suffer steak poisoning.
Having recently enjoyed an intestinal infection, and the visit of
of some thieves taking a shoulder bag containing
On 04/24/2012 10:27 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 08:01 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>> Hi *!
>>
>>
>> On behalf of the conference organizers, we would like to invite you to
>> join the Linux Audio Conference 2012, kindly hosted by the Center for
>> Computer Research in Music and A
At 12:43 24/04/2012, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
You also seem to think that 16 bits are enough FAPP, but orchestra
recordings have often more than 96dB dynamic range. I know that you
can hear under the noise floor. But then, you probably will hear
also some noise?
Even worse is the horrid gritt
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
You also seem to think that 16 bits are enough FAPP, but orchestra
recordings have often more than 96dB dynamic range. I know that you can
hear under the noise floor. But then, you probably will hear
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
You also seem to think that 16 bits are enough FAPP, but orchestra
recordings have often more than 96dB dynamic range. I know that you can
hear under the noise floor. But then, you probably will hear
nema
> renderer but maybe VBAP?
> Anyone have any more detailed technical info?
>
> Dave
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.
Re dynamic range of orchestras.
For recording one needs more than CD standard 16 bits because
one never knows when some instantanteous peak may stick
way out and clip nastily if one does not have a lot of headroom.
Thank goodness for 24 bits!
But seriously, no orchestral music really has more th
Robert Greene wrote:
Re dynamic range of orchestras.
For recording one needs more than CD standard 16 bits because
one never knows when some instantanteous peak may stick
way out and clip nastily if one does not have a lot of headroom.
Thank goodness for 24 bits!
But seriously, no orchestral m
Lest I sound too would-be definitive, I should add
that in actuality there are now concert halls with noise
levels at the threshold of human hearing, at least
when they are empty. Since an orchestra at close range
can reach 100dB and then some(though out in the hall
the level is much lower), this
21 matches
Mail list logo
