> J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
>> the tetra sounds great, but the connectors are very flimsy.
>
> The connectors are all from Switchcraft's Tini-Q (mini-XLR) series, used
> in
> many professional products and contexts.
>
> In the six years since TetraMic was introduced, we've had exactly one
> cab
Marc Lavallée wrote:
In my experience, the order of channels in jack are stable enough to
use this simple channels remapping trick:
mplayer -channels 4 -af channels=4:4:0:0:1:3:2:1:3:2 -ao
jack:port=ambdec AJH_eight-positions.amb
FWIW, while looking at mplayer code it occured to me that -
1.
english. :)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131115/6fe7461d/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
David,
I've also got an ambisonic visualizer plugin developed but not published
. Aside from the kind of interface cleanup it would need for public
release, it uses what I eventually realized is a horribly inefficient
algorithm. I've mostly built it for my own testing purposes - to see
what
J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
the tetra sounds great, but the connectors are very flimsy.
The connectors are all from Switchcraft's Tini-Q (mini-XLR) series, used in
many professional products and contexts.
In the six years since TetraMic was introduced, we've had exactly one cable
returned
Good.
I'm saving money, as I don't need the new glasses after all.
:-)
Eero
Martin Kantola wrote:
Eero Aro skrev 15.11.2013 19:46:
Now that I look at the not-so-good-resolution photo on Martin's
page, I can see that it is 6 pins.
The proto was indeed 6-pin, but the production model is 5-pi
Eero Aro skrev 15.11.2013 19:46:
Now that I look at the not-so-good-resolution photo on Martin's
page, I can see that it is 6 pins.
The proto was indeed 6-pin, but the production model is 5-pin XLR, so
Eero was correct.
Martin
___
Sursound ma
Ok
Now that I look at the not-so-good-resolution photo on Martin's
page, I can see that it is 6 pins.
6-pin XLR:s have been used for "dual channel intercom systems and stage
lighting control applications"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XLR_connector#Six_pin
I must get new reading glasses. Doh!
Eero did not hold a prototype.
I did hold a prototype several years ago.
I'm a little bit surprised that the type of a connector is the most
important
thing that raises discussion about a new B-format microphone in Sursound.
The easiest way to get information is to contact Martin directly:
h
David Cindric wrote:
I am wondering if there is some software with wich I could determine sound
direction from tetra mic (4-channel) recordings.
Have a look at IRIS, from Marshall Day Acoustics Ltd.:
http://www.iris.co.nz
Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com)
Core Sound LLC
www.core-s
J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 03:31 PM, Eero Aro wrote:
...
>> Just by the accident, I visited an Audio-Visual Fair in the Helsinki
>> Fair Centre this afternoon and had a chat with Martin, who has
>> designed the microphone.
>>
>> I actually held the microphone in my hand. There was
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 04:56:49PM +, Paul Hodges wrote:
> 1 ground
> 2 power
> 3 W+, X-, Y-
> 4 W-, X+, Y-
> 5 W-, X-, Y+
>
> then
>
> W is (3, 0.5(4+5))
> X is (4, 0.5(3+5))
> Y is (5, 0.5(3+4))
>
> That's better; things cancel out properly that way.
Shouldn't that be
W is (3, 0.5 (4,
> In that case for my ambiences and nature recordings unfortunately it
> will give me so issues to work with.
>
Don't think there is _an_ answer for nature recording, though be glad to
be proved wrong.
Fons' TetraMic+Parabola interests me greatly ... though obviously the
output is not periphonic
Hello Jörn,
brilliant, thanks so much for your answer.
As far as I understand the Tetramic has TA3 and TA6 connectors (AKA mimi
XLR) which I use on a daily basis with my SD552 and 788T with no problem.
What is the problem you encoutered with them?
Also they claim to sound as good as a DPA mic,
14 matches
Mail list logo
