Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:50:46 +0200,
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote :
> > Regarding the Linux version, what interfaces does it have ?
> > Will it output to Jack ? To any of the 24..64 ch soundcards
> > I use ?
>
> svein, will there be a linux version?
> if so, i might have a customer for you.
> my attempts
Congratulations! I was looking forward to this release after trying
the online conversion. Any chance there will be a non-commercial price
(I'm a sound artist, not a commercial producer)? It feels a bit unfair
to me that something like this gets focused only on main stream
commercial production whe
On 04/01/2011 09:47 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:22:18PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
iiuc, it doesn't make sense to use harpex for sonification. harpex'
strong point is to sharpen first-order natural recordings and thus
increase the versatility of a tetrahedral mic
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110401/8d41cabb/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Hi guys,
Congratulations on doing this, first of all.
I probably have very much more "traditional" setups than most people
here, so I doubt the sort of configurations I require are the same as
most other people.
I've only played with the player so far, and only briefly. So some quick
notes:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:22:18PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> iiuc, it doesn't make sense to use harpex for sonification. harpex'
> strong point is to sharpen first-order natural recordings and thus
> increase the versatility of a tetrahedral microphone.
>
> to get sharp localisation f
On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Svein Berge wrote:
> 5. counter-productively expensive (compared to Reaper or Plogue)
>
> As you all know, the marginal cost of software is close to zero, everything
> is in the development. So, when you compare a specialized product to a
> mass-market product, it m
I was wondering why Digital Performer wasn't included in your Plug-in list?
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Svein Berge wrote:
> http://harpex.net/download.html
>
> On 1. april. 2011, at 17:26, Danny McCarty wrote:
>
>> Could you post the link again please?
>>
>
>
http://harpex.net/download.html
On 1. april. 2011, at 17:26, Danny McCarty wrote:
Could you post the link again please?
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Could you post the link again please?
On Apr 1, 2011, at 2:37 AM, Svein Berge wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> Thanks for the feedback! I'll answer each comment separately. As a general
> comment, I should say that these products aim to be as useful as possible to
> as many users as possible while li
Harpex-B is out!
http://harpex.net/presskit20110331/ (Press release)
http://harpex.net/download.html (plug-in trial version / free player app for
Win, Mac & Linux)
Regards,
Andrew
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.mus
On 01/04/2011 14:22, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 04/01/2011 01:55 PM, Richard Dobson wrote:
On 01/04/2011 10:37, Svein Berge wrote:
...
of the development. Since this plugin in practice requires the use of a
soundfield-type microphone, which is not really a mass-market product,
I hope compos
On 01/04/2011 12:19, Svein Berge wrote:
On 1. april. 2011, at 13:08, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
On the question of with-height - I presume that, at the very least, the binaural out produces
height?
Absolutely.
Ahh - just noticed this is greyed out on the player.
Dave
On 04/01/2011 01:55 PM, Richard Dobson wrote:
On 01/04/2011 10:37, Svein Berge wrote:
...
of the development. Since this plugin in practice requires the use of a
soundfield-type microphone, which is not really a mass-market product,
I hope composers are not entirely disregarded in this, which
Certainly does (speaking with academic hat on)!
Maybe also student pricing at an even lower point but just for one year/duration of course, like
Max/MSP?
Dave
On 01/04/2011 12:20, Svein Berge wrote:
That makes sense.
Svein
On 1. april. 2011, at 12:45, John Leonard wrote:
Perhaps one a
On 01/04/2011 10:37, Svein Berge wrote:
...
of the development. Since this plugin in practice requires the use of a
soundfield-type microphone, which is not really a mass-market product,
I hope composers are not entirely disregarded in this, which seems to me
to be an unnecessarily limited ass
That makes sense.
Svein
On 1. april. 2011, at 12:45, John Leonard wrote:
Perhaps one answer to this is to offer academic pricing? This is
what Soundfield does with the main SurroundZone plug-in, as far as I
remember.
Best wishes,
John
On 1 Apr 2011, at 05:37, Svein Berge wrote:
I thin
On 1. april. 2011, at 13:08, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
They priced the software based on a similar model to yours (and
insisted on me developing a dongle which put up the costs even
further) against the advice of those of us in the business (so to
speak). The result - way lower sales
Hi Svein,
Thanks for the prompt response. I understand only too well the pricing
problems for stuff like this, even though i am insulated from all that by
being employed by the Uni (at least, till September next year). We had
experience of this in the early days of the Composer's Desktop Proj
Perhaps one answer to this is to offer academic pricing? This is what
Soundfield does with the main SurroundZone plug-in, as far as I remember.
Best wishes,
John
On 1 Apr 2011, at 05:37, Svein Berge wrote:
> I think it's a good deal, but don't expect much sympathy from academia.
_
Hello Dave,
Thanks for the feedback! I'll answer each comment separately. As a
general comment, I should say that these products aim to be as useful
as possible to as many users as possible while limiting the feature
set to something that is easy to document, understand and support. The
f
Yep, I've downloaded it too and it does look nice - I am _very_ envious of that
display!
The following comments are on the free player. Aside from any worries I (and no doubt many of those
who remember "active steering" quad decoders) have about any sort of active level/position
dependent pro
22 matches
Mail list logo
