On 3/29/23 04:28, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink wrote:
Hi Bob,
On Mar 28, 2023, at 19:47, rjmcmahon wrote:
Interesting. I'm skeptical that our cities in the U.S. can get this (structural
separation) right.
There really isn't that much to get wrong, you built the access network and termin
It can be worse than that: if a monopoly owns the poles, you're going to have
to bury your fibre. That will cost you something like $800,000 per mile, more
if you have to cross a road.
In my home town, Chatham, Ontario, the local ISP is installing fibre
underground because the duopoly of cable
Another point they missed: on earth, we can use conductive cooling and transfer
the heat from the machines to a flow of air. In space, we can only use
radiative cooling, and we need to be out of the sun to have enough temperature
difference.
--dave
On 4/20/23 07:10, Hesham ElBakoury via Star
On 5/24/23 10:49, Michael Richardson via Starlink wrote:
It saved your bacon, but yeah, like all other resilient protocols (DNS,
Happy Eyeballs) tends to hide when one option is failing :-)
> pure AQM, in the case above, since that flood was uncontrollable, would
> have resulted in a
On 10/30/23 13:46, Daniel AJ Sokolov via Starlink wrote:
There is an irony in this: Wasn't the internet a military project
meant to survive armageddon?
Not exactly, but it was funded from an ARPA project that investigated
the ability of packet protocols to route around the loss of multiple
lin
Cool: I got
01-08-2024 21:04:41 UTC Go Responsiveness to mensura.cdn-apple.com:443...
Results:
Download:
Throughput: 150.234 Mbps (18.779 MBps), using 8 parallel connections.
RPM: 624 (P90)
RPM: 1005 (Single-Sided 5% Trimmed Mean)
Upload:
Throughput:
When I was in the reserves (in an era of dinosaurs and stone axes), the
regulars were using encrypted, frequency-agile radios. They were hard to
localize unless you were so close that they were the loudest thing on the
airwaves.
Using Starlink from a fixed location Could Be Bad.
--dave
On 2
On 2024-03-17 11:47, Colin_Higbie via Starlink wrote:
Fortunately, in our case, even high latency shouldn't be too terrible, but as
you rightly point out, if there are many iterations, 1s minimum latency could
yield a several second lag, which would be poor UX for almost any application.
Sinc
I think that gamer experience doing simple (over-simple) tests with CAKE is a
booby-trap. This discussion suggests that the real performance of their link is
horrid, and that they turn off CAKE to get what they think is full
performance... but isn't.
https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/com
fe Member Affinity Group Hawaii Chair
IEEE Entrepreneurship, Mentor
eugene.ch...@ieee.org
m 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
On May 6, 2024, at 2:11 AM, Dave Collier-Brown via Starlink
wrote:
I think that gamer experience doing simple (over-simple) tests with
CAKE is a booby-trap. This discussion sugg
It has an RFC at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9330/
I read it as a way to rapidly find the available bandwidth without the TCP
"sawtooth". The paper cites fc_codel and research based on it.
I suspect My Smarter Colleagues know more (;-))
--dave
On 2024-05-07 08:13, David Fernández vi
Mr Musk reminds me of a salesperson I once worked with, who first sold himself
on all the impossible things GCOS could do better that OS/360, and then set out
to convince customers. The occasional customer would ask if he was barking mad
(;-)) Others merely assumed we just hired liars as sales
I recommend sticking a long piece of conductor to the satellite, rather than
banging on it with spaceships (;-))
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Z-H-Zhu/publication/251422339_Deorbiting_Dynamics_of_Electrodynamic_Tether/links/5cd4446b299bf14d95849bc3/Deorbiting-Dynamics-of-Electrodynamic-Te
s/satellite/asteroid/ --dave
On 11/3/22 14:11, Dave Collier-Brown via Starlink wrote:
I recommend sticking a long piece of conductor to the satellite,
rather than banging on it with spaceships (;-))
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Z-H-Zhu/publication
Since the speed of light is relatively fixed, I wonder if we could come
up with a memorable equation for how much buggering one needs for a
given RTT?
Preferably as memorable as E=MC^2
B <= C / RTT ? (:-))
--dave
On 1/2/23 13:44, Ben Greear via Starlink wrote:
On 1/2/23 9:35 AM, David Fernánd
I think using "speed" for "the inverse of delay" is pretty normal English, if
technically erroneous when speaking nerd or physicist.
Using it for volume? Arguably more like fraudulent...
--dave
On 1/4/23 18:54, Bruce Perens via Starlink wrote:
On the other hand, we would like to be comprehensi
16 matches
Mail list logo
