It has an RFC at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9330/
I read it as a way to rapidly find the available bandwidth without the TCP "sawtooth". The paper cites fc_codel and research based on it. I suspect My Smarter Colleagues know more (;-)) --dave On 2024-05-07 08:13, David Fernández via Starlink wrote: Is L4S a solution to bufferbloat? I have read that gamers are happy with it. Sorry, I read it here, in Spanish: https://www.adslzone.net/noticias/operadores/retardo-videojuegos-nokia-vodafone Regards, David F. Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 06:50:41 -0400 From: Rich Brown <richb.hano...@gmail.com<mailto:richb.hano...@gmail.com>> To: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.ch...@ieee.org<mailto:eugene.ch...@ieee.org>> Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de<mailto:moell...@gmx.de>>, Colin_Higbie <chigb...@higbie.name><mailto:chigb...@higbie.name>, Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] The "reasons" that bufferbloat isn't a problem Message-ID: <175cc5c3-f70a-49e8-a84d-87e24c04e...@gmail.com<mailto:175cc5c3-f70a-49e8-a84d-87e24c04e...@gmail.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Gene,
On May 6, 2024, at 8:38 PM, Eugene Y Chang <eugene.ch...@ieee.org<mailto:eugene.ch...@ieee.org>> wrote: It seems like you signed off on this challenge. Don’t do that. Help give me the tools to push this to the next level.
Not at all - I'm definitely signed up for this. But I collected all these points so we can be clear-eyed about the objections that people cite. Bufferbloat definitely exists. And there are straightforward technical solutions. And as you say, our challenge is to find a way to build the case for broad adoption of these techniques. Best regards, Rich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20240507/ecb7b91e/attachment-0001.html> _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest dave.collier-br...@indexexchange.com<mailto:dave.collier-br...@indexexchange.com> | -- Mark Twain CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory.
_______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
