Alan,
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:33:00 -0600
Alan Ordway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> try putting the defang_mime 0 in the local.cf file in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin instead.
>
> I got that from /usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf
> "
> # SpamAssassin basic config file
> #
> # Please don't modify this
Victor O'Rear said:
> Spamd, by default, ignores user/.spamassassin/user_prefs, for "security" and
> performance reasons.
>
> How can I restore user_prefs functionality? (Besides not using spamd?)
allow_user_rules 1
--j.
---
This sf.net emai
I am a newbie.
I have setup exim 4.10 on RH8.
Now I am trying to setup SA.
Are there any config examples as my filter is not working.
Filter error: filtering command "fail" is disabled: near line 11 of filter
file
filter is:
# Exim Filter
if first_delivery and
$h_X-Spam-Flag: contains "YE
Can I put the spamd log's in a file?.
Bye!
--
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Jose Miguel Herrera M. - User #246070 counter.li.org
jherrera[@]inf.utfsm.cl
-
Est.Ing.Civil Informática - UTFSM
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Anyone seen this one: http://www.freep.com/money/tech/mwend6_20021206.htm
--
Kent Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager - Systems & Networking
Hunter Engineering Company
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
htt
Adam Henry wrote:
> I have received the following headers from a message from an Ebay
> purchaser, and am not sure why the GENUINE_EBAY_RCVD trigger wasn't
> Hit. Here they are:
>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The "From:" header doesn't end with @ebay.com, therefore the eBay checks
weren't performed
> Anyone seen this one:
> http://www.freep.com/money/tech/mwend6_20021206.htm
Yeah, /. had an article a couple days ago on this. Don't think it'll stop
him though
Josh
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek hea
> "FA" == Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FA> After reading the FAQ, I decided it would be appropriate to ask about this.
FA> Regardless of MTA-specific criteria, I wondered if there was a way (or an
FA> effort to create) to integrate SpamAssasin at the MTA level (Sendmail,
FA> P
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:40:28PM -0600, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> Well I assume it is..
>
> here is a test of dccproc
>
> dccproc -Q -C < sample-spam.txt
> send(dcc.dcc-servers.net (153.19.44.233,6277)): Operation not permitted
that first line looks like an error. the rest looks like valid o
Yup...I think I saw it mentioned here, first.
On one hand, it's great that he's finally getting what's coming to him,
and at least the senders are paying postage on the items being sent.
On the other hand, it's a shame that the vendors and retailers in question
have to pay, themselves, for havi
> "AH" == Adam Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AH> Question becomes, how does one know if an email is genuinely from
AH> Ebay? Next question is, why do the following hostnames resolve to
AH> private-class IP (is this normal behavior?):
When you speak to my web server and ask it to do somet
I'm pretty sure the "scramble-message-id" feature is intended to prevent
harvest spammers from mistaking your message-id for an email address.
-- Forwarded message --
Message-id:
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:40:49 + (GMT)
From: Nancy McGough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Procmail Mail
I was just thinking: I get multiple copies of a lot of spam. Are there
any spamassasin rules, or other tools, that filter on the basis of
receiving copies of the same message?
Miles Fidelman
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
W
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> Yup...I think I saw it mentioned here, first.
>
> On one hand, it's great that he's finally getting what's coming to him,
> and at least the senders are paying postage on the items being sent.
>
> On the other hand, it's a shame that
> "DF" == Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DF> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
>> While I agree with what they're doing, I disagree with how they're doing
>> it. For all intents and purposes, the "anti-spammers" in question are
>> still costing someone
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:44:45AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was just thinking: I get multiple copies of a lot of spam. Are there
> any spamassasin rules, or other tools, that filter on the basis of
> receiving copies of the same message?
There's no real way for SA to do this. If the
Bart Schaefer said:
> I'm pretty sure the "scramble-message-id" feature is intended to prevent
> harvest spammers from mistaking your message-id for an email address.
You can pass it on -- that will be fine by us. ;)
--j.
---
This sf.net e
Hello, I have SpamAssassin running (2.43) with
spamass-milter (0.1.2), this is all
working great and we have the level of spam
trapping working great, I control email for
a few domains and all the domains I host want to
have the spam deleted instead of
just subject tagged, how do I get a syst
At least, not as advertised
I have set up 2 spamd servers, and I have spamc being used from my
.procmailrc like so:
spamc -d spamd.alink.net -f
However... when I shut down the spamd on one, there are failures
connecting to both.. is this a known bug, or have I overlooked something
somewhere i
At least, not as advertised
I have set up 2 spamd servers, and I have spamc being used from my
.procmailrc like so:
spamc -d spamd.alink.net -f
However... when I shut down the spamd on one, there are failures
connecting to both.. is this a known bug, or have I overlooked something
somewhere i
I've been seeing new headers in spam.
X-Info:
X-Camp_ID:
The X-Camp_ID is followed by an alpha string. Anyone else seeing this?
Thanks,
Dennis
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn
I figured this out
needed to allow udp port 6277 through firewall
just thought you might want to know
had the same problem with pyzor, needed to add 24442
did not have this probelm with razor2 since it starts with a ping
...
> I am having a little problem with dcc..
>
> I have razor working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
I was wonder what everyone thinks/uses for the best way to sync up
the spamassassin rules. I was looking at the CVS tree and planning
just to sync it up daily but I want to know if there are any other
ways that other people prefer.
Thanks.
-
Dennis Boylan wrote:
I've been seeing new headers in spam.
X-Info:
X-Camp_ID:
The X-Camp_ID is followed by an alpha string. Anyone else seeing this?
Thanks,
Dennis
Yep, I've seen a few. Also have been seeing "X-CampaignID:" usually
followed with a 5-digit number.
Some new malware?
--Ri
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0800, Ryan Qmail Test wrote:
> I was wonder what everyone thinks/uses for the best way to sync up
> the spamassassin rules. I was looking at the CVS tree and planning
> just to sync it up daily but I want to know if there are any other
> ways that other people p
Using the -C or -p options, does it over ride the primary config?
Matt Kettler wrote:
*if* you can make your procmail recipies figure out what config files
to use, you can use the -C switch to spamassassin to specify an
alternate config or -p to set an alternate user_prefs file (you
probably
>Some new malware?
Sure looks like a "unquestionably SPAM" header flag. Refuse it in the
milter, heh heh.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Puhek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Dennis Boylan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New type of SPAM
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0800, Ryan Qmail Test wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was wonder what everyone thinks/uses for the best way to sync up
> the spamassassin rules. I was looking at the CVS tree and planning
> just to sync it up daily but I want to know if there are any other
> ways that othe
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> As to determining if it is really ebay, well, that's a really good
> question. I guess if the last received header prior to your mail
> server's header is ebay, it would be a good hint.
Excellent suggestion. This begs a few additiona
Based on the output I assume you must be running 2.50-cvs, since 2.43 would
not support multiple hosts in this manner.
And since this is new code in a CVS, not too surprising that it might have
a bug However, taking a casual look at the libspamc.c from the latest
CVS snapshot on
http://spa
Hey now.
I can see using it in legit opt-in mailings. We run one now that includes
html links and tracking identification as part of the uri, so we can see how
many visits and sales are generated by our email newsletters
(approximately).
I can't foresee using a header, but it might happen
I'm new to this list, though I've been using spamassassin for some
months now with excellent results.
I'm not at all convinced though that multihop blacklists should be
enabled in spamassassin by default, since such listings generally just
indicate that an ISP has a customer with an open relay.
32 matches
Mail list logo
