> "KWG" == Kevin W Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KWG> header. According to the rfc there can not be a space unless
KWG> it is quoted (simplified). Ie: From: John Doe
KWG> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is not compliant but From: "John Doe"
KWG> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is. It seems that is where Webshield
I have a series of local rules and a extensive blacklist setup.
Everything resides in /etc/mail/spamassassin. local.cf only holds some
settings (like required_hits 7). The other settings are in
udlp_blacklist.cf, udlp_whitelist.cf, udlp_rules.cf and
udlp_scores.cf. They are correclty parsed and
Thanks, Theo...much appreciated.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Out of curiosity..I've been rejecting with a code of 550...what's the
> > difference between 550 and 553?
>
> RFC 2821, s4.2.3:
>
> 550 Requested
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:09:17PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First question...does this seem correct as a start?
Looks good so far. You will probably want to use spamc/spamd instead
of spamassassin for site-wide though; it's a heck of a lot faster.
> Second questionhtml files seem
I have a feeling this is one of those wack-a-mole solutions. While is
sounds like lots of fun (! :) ) I feel it might be better to rely on
other
means for scoring this spam. Namely the DNSBLs that specifically look
for
spamhauses like HSM or Razor2. I just don't see any other feasible
solution
It's a basic banner. There's no other place to stick it. Perhaps a
generic telnet banner would also suffice (which is highly recommended by
just about every security book/whitepaper out there. By putting it in the
HELO string and saying about "by continuing the connection you signify
consent" I
First, check ALL the headers, including the Return-Path header. SA will
whitelist on both and you've only included part of the headers in your
report. Checking From: is not sufficient.
See this bug for some details:
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1038
If you are SURE th
Is it possible to train SA 2.43 with known spam like sa-learn-spam does in
SA 2.50?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-tal
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:22:20AM -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
> Is it possible to train SA 2.43 with known spam like sa-learn-spam does in
> SA 2.50?
2.43 doesn't have any "learning" rules. 2.50 has a bayes-ish system
which is what sa-learn-spam trains.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
How do I type
Well I assume it is..
here is a test of dccproc
dccproc -Q -C < sample-spam.txt
send(dcc.dcc-servers.net (153.19.44.233,6277)): Operation not permitted
checksum
env_From: 7626fef7 abf46f52 46aa8081 8e4f6383
Hi
I found the file 30_text_de.cf. But how can I use this file. I found no
documentation about it.
Please help me.
Thx and regards
Benjamin
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
*if* you can make your procmail recipies figure out what config files to
use, you can use the -C switch to spamassassin to specify an alternate
config or -p to set an alternate user_prefs file (you probably want -p)
However, SA cannot automatically switch configs based on the envelope-to
addre
After reading the FAQ, I decided it would be appropriate to ask about this.
Regardless of MTA-specific criteria, I wondered if there was a way (or an
effort to create) to integrate SpamAssasin at the MTA level (Sendmail,
Postfix, Exim, Qmail -- whatever). The goal being to further insulate
re
There are several sendmail milters which call SA at the MTA level.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=spamassassin+milter&btnG=Google+Search
Some of the list participants might be able to point out which milters they
like best.
Most posting to the list regarding milters seem
Spamd, by default, ignores user/.spamassassin/user_prefs, for "security" and
performance reasons.
How can I restore user_prefs functionality? (Besides not using spamd?)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Found the answer here
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/11679/2002/8/200/9430566/
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassi
We have a Red hat 7.3 mail server and I am looking for a way to filter out
SPAM email from our server. We have about 30 email accounts. Can Spam
Assassin do this?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://t
Greetings,
I have received the following headers from a message from an Ebay
purchaser, and am not sure why the GENUINE_EBAY_RCVD trigger wasn't
Hit. Here they are:
| Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Received: from intrepid.marinar.com by webslayer.marinar.com
| (8.9.3/8.9.3)
|id G
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a Red hat 7.3 mail server and I am looking for a way to filter
> out SPAM email from our server. We have about 30 email accounts. Can
> SpamAssassin do this?
Yes.
--
Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and
http://www.pathname.com/~q
Anybody have any idea when a stable release of SA 2.50 might be due?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:49:11PM -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
> Anybody have any idea when a stable release of SA 2.50 might be due?
I've been thinking we need to start a pool like the 2.6 linux kernel. ;)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Hmm, maybe I should give a talk about Perl as a martial art...
21 matches
Mail list logo
