Thanks, Theo...much appreciated. On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote: > > Out of curiosity..I've been rejecting with a code of 550...what's the > > difference between 550 and 553? > > RFC 2821, s4.2.3: > > 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable > (e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected > for policy reasons) > 551 User not local; please try <forward-path> > (See section 3.4) > 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation > 553 Requested action not taken: mailbox name not allowed > (e.g., mailbox syntax incorrect) > 554 Transaction failed (Or, in the case of a connection-opening > response, "No SMTP service here") > > > So 550 is the better choice (access denied). > > -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
