On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> What ever happened to spamproxyd?
I don't know much about it, but the code is still there in 2.50.
> Is it still supported?
I assume...
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Even my usual 'careful' is not very careful by other peoples
Tom,
| I was looking around for something that would work as an advanced
| filter under postfix. I've had recommendations for amavisd and
| found some "stuff" on spamproxyd.
|
| How is this related to SpamAssassin? spamproxyd and a lot of
| people here have mentioned amavis so I'll guess this
File a bugzilla ticket on it, and attach the patch, then assign the
ticket to me.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:12, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
>
> > --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jus
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> > be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> > to
--On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ..
> -Original Message-
> From: Maurits Bloos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 March 2002 16:52
> To: 'Greg Ward'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a
> spamtrap box & the
> i ntended recip ient'
>
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: woensdag 20 maart 2002 17:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a
> spamtrap box & the
> intended recip ient'
>
>
> O
On 20 March 2002, Maurits Bloos said:
> Has anyone 'hacked' spamproxyd to send *SPAM* to both the intended recipient
> and to a 'spamtrap' mailbox ?
Why bother? I thought the point of spamproxyd was to allow rejecting
spam at SMTP-time. If you're just going to accept it anyways, then use
your r
Hi,
Somewhere it should say
my $status = $spamtest->check($mail);
if ($status->is_spam ()) {
$status->rewrite_mail ();
$message = join ("",$mail->header(),@{$mail->body()});
@recipients = ("$spamaddr");
$recips = \@recipients;
} else {
$
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:30:55PM +0100, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote:
> hi,
>
> I just setup a mail relay using postfix w/ spamassassin 2.1 via
> spamproxyd
> (I couldn't use procmail because the transport map takes precedence over
> mailbox_command=/usr/bin/procmail)
>
>
> but I still have some q
10 matches
Mail list logo
