yep ..but i fear my perl/cpan setup is a bit wierd ... ill try a clean
install someday when i have the time ...
/thomas
On 7/1-2004, at 15.18, Eric W. Bates wrote:
Are you running the latest version of Time::HiRes?
Thomas von Hassel wrote:
anyone have a hint on this one ? ...i would love to u
Thomas von Hassel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Error when using spamd/spamc
anyone have a hint on this one ? ...i would love to use spamc/spamd
becouse the load on my mailgateway is beginning to get pretty high ...
/thomas
On 6/1-2004, at 9.58, Thomas von Hassel wrote:
I get this erro
anyone have a hint on this one ? ...i would love to use spamc/spamd
becouse the load on my mailgateway is beginning to get pretty high ...
/thomas
On 6/1-2004, at 9.58, Thomas von Hassel wrote:
I get this error when trying to use spamd/spamc with version 2.61 and
the Advosys scripts with postf
--On Friday, October 31, 2003 7:29 AM -0800 "Nichols, William"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I get the error below, and haven't really been able to track it down (I
> am not a Perl wiz like many of you :-P)
>
> If someone has seen this or can help me out that would be great. This is
> Spama
At Sun Oct 26 01:36:05 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The error i am seeing relates to spamd & it is as follows
> Still running as root: user not specified with -u, not
> found, or not set to root. Fall back to nobody.
> I did try n add this in the init script for spam
> assassin under the
Hi Ewald,
the problem you have is that your system seems not to have a "make"
pre-compiler:
> Writing Makefile for Mail::SpamAssassin
> Makefile:92: *** missing separator. Stop.
> /usr/bin/make -- NOT OK
> Running make test
> Can't test without successful make
> Running make install
> ma
Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> About $PATH:
>> From the spamd start script:
> PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin
What's the _full_ PATH variable? Telling me that /usr/bin and
/usr/local/bin were appended to PATH does not answer the question.
> And you're right, Daniel, in the
=?iso-8859-1?B?THVpcyBIZXJu4W4gT3RlZ3Vp?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I guess nobody noticed my other post, so here we go again:
> Since upgrading to SA-2.60-RC5, I'm getting this warnings in the maillog
> whenever spamd analizes a message:
> Sep 22 10:39:00 nahuel spamd[16955]: DCC -> ch
h You..."
From: Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5
Date: 22 Sep 2003 10:28:33 -0700
=?iso-8859-1?B?THVpcyBIZXJu4W4gT3RlZ3Vp?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:39:27PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> I upgraded and now I have the following error message on every mail
> message:
> What else am I suppoed to do?
does "dccproc -H < message" work? if not, you'll have to ask the DCC folks.
if so, try a SA -D run and see what the outp
At 09:36 AM 9/5/2003 -0500, Segree, Gareth wrote:
I am getting the following error from the spamd daemon when running from
exiscan
Creating default_prefs [//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
Cannot write to //.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such file or directory
Where can I change the location that spamass
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:28:38AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
> sh: lsof: command not found
well that's not good. I'd go grab a copy and install it. Source can
be found via http://freshmeat.net/projects/lsof/ and if you're running
Linux there are packages available.
It's a great utility
That sounds like you're trying to start a copy of spamd when one is already
running.
try a netstat -l and see if something is already using port 783.
netstat -lp may tell you what process or PID is using the port.
If something besides spamd is using 783, you can pass a -p parameter to
spamd an
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> There's an issue with one of the rpc progs (not related to NFS as I
> remember) grabbing 783 sometimes, but that's why an 'lsof -i :783'
> will answer what process is using the port.
Ok I found and installed LSOF. I ran it and it says spamd. I think that
perhaps the shut
sh: lsof: command not found
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:57:42AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
Ok I started it with -p 784 switch ... so is 784 a good port to use? I
don't know which port to use that would avoid a conflict like this in
the future ... apparently something
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:41:59PM -0600, Anthony Martinez wrote:
> NFS package kept grabbing the first unused port not in /etc/services. I'm only
> trying to help, don't get all flamey on me.
Not getting flamey, but if you make a statement like "restart this major
service which isn't involved wit
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:26:59PM -0600, Anthony Martinez wrote:
> I think, last time I saw this discussed, you needed to add
> spamd 783/tcp
No you don't.
> in /etc/services, and restart the NFS server.
WTF does NFS have to do with this?
There's an issue with one of the rpc progs (no
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:39:18PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:26:59PM -0600, Anthony Martinez wrote:
> > I think, last time I saw this discussed, you needed to add
> > spamd 783/tcp
>
> No you don't.
>
> > in /etc/services
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:57:42AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
> Ok I started it with -p 784 switch ... so is 784 a good port to use? I
> don't know which port to use that would avoid a conflict like this in
> the future ... apparently something on my system was already using 783!
run 'lsof
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:24:21AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> I installed spamassassin on a cobalt Raq3. (Yeah I can hear the groans
> already.) So on starting spamd using the script in rc.d it gives this
> message:
>
> Starting spamd: spamdCould not creat
To further complicate things, I restarted it after it had been on port
784, and on restart it gave me the same error message. Is it not
shutting down appropriately do you think...? Could that be the issue?
Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
> Ok I started it with -p 784 switch ... so is 784 a good port to
Ok I started it with -p 784 switch ... so is 784 a good port to use? I
don't know which port to use that would avoid a conflict like this in
the future ... apparently something on my system was already using 783!
Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
> I installed spamassassin on a cobalt Raq3. (Yeah I can h
ug: all '*From' addrs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debug: running meta tests; score so far=1.8
debug: is spam? score=1.8 required=5
tests=DATE_MISSING,MISSING_HEADERS,NO_REAL_NAME
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dev" <[EMAIL PRO
Does anyone have any idea on this one??
im using spamassassin 2.50
everything was working with 2.43
Dev.
- Original Message -
From: "Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] error
> Im using qmail+vpopmail
> this is th
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:30:05AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Let me guess, you upgraded SA recently? The above almost always happens
> due to an upgrade and some form of mismatched code (scripts and modules,
> modules and rules, etc.)
Yes. i updated it with apt-get, then icompile the curren
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:36:04PM +0100, Enno Lenze wrote:
> Yes. i updated it with apt-get, then icompile the current stable version,
> then the newest, without fixing the problem.
What you want to do is blow away the scripts, rules, and modules. Then reinstall.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:49:34PM +0100, Enno Lenze wrote:
> Can't locate object method "handle_auto_report" via package
> "Mail::SpamAssassin:
> :PerMsgStatus" (perhaps you forgot to load
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus"?)
> at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 231.
> procmail: Program failure (70)
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am a newbie here to all this, so please forgive my ignorance.
> > I have tried installing via the RPMs and good old make, and I get this error
> > both ways. I am running Redhat 7.1 with perl v5.6.0
>
> I am a newbie here to all this, so please forgive my ignorance.
> I have tried installing via the RPMs and good old make, and I get this error
> both ways. I am running Redhat 7.1 with perl v5.6.0, and spamassassin 2.43.
> If someone can shed any light on this I would be most thankful, I am at
My experience, really, has been the procmail already being configured as
the default LDA, and the .forward being in place.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dave Young wrote:
> this is an MTA error.
>
> try creating a symlink /usr/adm/sm.bin which points to /etc/smrsh
>
> I've noticed that some incarnations
this is an MTA error.
try creating a symlink /usr/adm/sm.bin which points to /etc/smrsh
I've noticed that some incarnations of smrsh actually look in /usr/adm/sm.bin
instead of /etc/smrsh.
hth,
Dave
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 12:36 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> First, and foremost, try rena
First, and foremost, try renaming your .forward to soemthing else, and
then try sending mail to that account, again.
In *most* default installs, procmail is already set up as the local
delivery agent. Putting a call in .forward to procmail will then confuse
the issue.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, [Win
Sebastian Seitz said:
> I've just installed SA 2.42 and everything works fine except the following error
> when I start the daemon:
>
> Failed to run RAZOR_CHECK SpamAssassin test, skipping: ^I(Can't locate object me
> thod "check_razor" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at /usr/l
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 11:47 am, Bart Schaefer spake:
> SA 2.20 uses your local.cf scores when running its tests, so some of the
> tests can go wrong. 2.30 and later have fixed this.
>
> If you don't have any local scores that could be causing this, then I'm
> as much in the dark as you.
Tha
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Weyland wrote:
> Can someone tell me what this means?
SA 2.20 uses your local.cf scores when running its tests, so some of the
tests can go wrong. 2.30 and later have fixed this.
If you don't have any local scores that could be causing this, then I'm
as much in the dark a
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 08:56:23AM -0400, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> Nils Vogels wrote:
>
> > results of a cat sample-spam.txt | spamassassin -DP :
> >
> > debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> > auto_report_threshold 30
>
> The auto_report_threshold line should
Nils Vogels wrote:
> results of a cat sample-spam.txt | spamassassin -DP :
>
> debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> auto_report_threshold 30
The auto_report_threshold line should be removed from user_prefs - SA's
not reading it.
> Can't locate object metho
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 10:46:56 -0700 (PDT), Craig R Hughes wrote:
CRH> Yes, I just noticed this myself. I think it's a bug in the patch
CRH> from Bugzilla#343 -- looks like a copy/paste bug -- how can you
CRH> expect to read from a descriptor which perl just told you it failed
CRH> to open...
oh y
Yes, I just noticed this myself. I think it's a bug in the patch from Bugzilla
#343 -- looks like a copy/paste bug -- how can you expect to read from a
descriptor which perl just told you it failed to open...
I'll delete that line.
C
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS> During "make test" (which BTW I t
You have to run /etc/rc.d/init.d/* scripts as root.
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anybody have a quick cure for this?
>
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin start
> Starting spamd: Cannot create tmp lockfile /root/.spamassassin/auto-
> whitelist.lock : No such file or directory
>
Try the following:
# . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
# killproc spamd
What does it say?
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:57, AHA Lists wrote:
> I am running this as root. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
> on 4/1/02 11:43 AM, Craig Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Only thing I can think of is you're
I am running this as root. Any other ideas?
on 4/1/02 11:43 AM, Craig Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Only thing I can think of is you're not root when trying to run the
> shutdown script, so you can't kill the process. Become root first, then
> run the script.
>
> C
>
> On Mon, 2002-
Only thing I can think of is you're not root when trying to run the
shutdown script, so you can't kill the process. Become root first, then
run the script.
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 06:57, AHA Lists wrote:
> When ever I try and stop spamd I get an error using the redhat init script.
>
> /etc/rc.
> /bin/sh: pod2text: command not found
> /bin/sh: pod2text: command not found
> make: *** [doc/.made] Error 127
pod2text is a tool used to generate documentation from som Perl
source. It means there is something strange in the way your perl
distro was installed.
In another hand, you don't absolu
Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I really think that we can get rid of those extra libraries. On Debian,
> spamc builds with just libc.
It will build fine on many systems (particularly linux) which have modern
libc/glibc's where the unix socket stuff is automatically linked by your linker.
However, th
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:20:08PM -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 12 March 2002, Clayton A. Burnham said:
> > I get the following error while "making" SpamAssassin:
> >
> > gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
>-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O spamd/spamc.c \
> >
On 12 March 2002, Clayton A. Burnham said:
> I get the following error while "making" SpamAssassin:
>
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
>-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O spamd/spamc.c \
> -o spamd/spamc -L/usr/local/lib -lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb -ldl
47 matches
Mail list logo
